| 23:59 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
|
| 23:59 | Bertl | back now ...
|
| 00:06 | slikdigit | left the channel |
| 00:41 | mot | left the channel |
| 00:43 | mot | joined the channel |
| 00:55 | mot | left the channel |
| 00:55 | mot | joined the channel |
| 01:35 | mot | left the channel |
| 02:07 | mot | joined the channel |
| 02:17 | TD-Linux | left the channel |
| 02:26 | TD-Linux | joined the channel |
| 02:26 | TD-Linux | left the channel |
| 02:26 | TD-Linux | joined the channel |
| 03:00 | TD-Linux | left the channel |
| 03:10 | TD-Linux | joined the channel |
| 03:24 | ShinyCyril | left the channel |
| 03:53 | mot | left the channel |
| 04:05 | TD-Linux | left the channel |
| 04:16 | TD-Linux | joined the channel |
| 04:18 | mot | joined the channel |
| 05:10 | baldand | left the channel |
| 05:12 | mot | left the channel |
| 05:17 | mot | joined the channel |
| 05:19 | baldand | joined the channel |
| 06:06 | ShinyCyril | joined the channel |
| 06:25 | aombk2 | left the channel |
| 06:29 | aombk | joined the channel |
| 06:55 | Bertl | off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
|
| 06:55 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
|
| 07:13 | se6astian | good morning
|
| 07:29 | troy_s | left the channel |
| 07:29 | troy_s | joined the channel |
| 08:25 | mot | left the channel |
| 08:26 | mot | joined the channel |
| 08:43 | ShinyCyril | left the channel |
| 08:43 | ShinyCyril | joined the channel |
| 09:00 | pozitron | joined the channel |
| 09:00 | pozitron | left the channel |
| 10:37 | intracube|away | changed nick to: intracube
|
| 12:08 | pozitron | joined the channel |
| 13:35 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
|
| 13:35 | Bertl | morning folks!
|
| 13:40 | ShinyCyril | left the channel |
| 14:36 | ShinyCyril | joined the channel |
| 15:30 | intracube | left the channel |
| 15:53 | troy_s | Nice little article. Anything come out of it?
|
| 15:56 | se6astian | not yet :)
|
| 16:05 | troy_s | se6astian: Is there an overarching plan in place yet via that process?
|
| 16:07 | troy_s | Part of the colorimetry thing (and this goes for the dipshittery behind “highlight recovery”) is that often the optics are extremely myopic, as opposed to one with a higher view of a typical pipeline.
|
| 16:07 | troy_s | (The needs of color accuracy and interchange exceed the attempts to recover "non data" for example)
|
| 16:27 | se6astian | not entirely sure I understand what you mean
|
| 16:27 | se6astian | but please comment on the article itself then those who held/were at the workshop will see it and be able to comment on it
|
| 16:36 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 17:02 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 17:17 | TD-Linux | left the channel |
| 17:17 | John_K | left the channel |
| 17:22 | TD-Linux | joined the channel |
| 17:25 | intracube | joined the channel |
| 17:25 | John_K | joined the channel |
| 17:47 | troy_s | se6astian: The whole colorimetry discourse has hidden and implied sets of assumptions.
|
| 17:48 | troy_s | se6astian: Which means that depending on what vantage you are coming at the problem from, you have different sets of needs.
|
| 17:49 | troy_s | se6astian: So for example, if you are mixing footage etc. in a post production pipe, the last thing you would want is any sort of goofy highlight recovery. Could be a post production “effect” to try and augment some sequence if handled carefully, but certainly not desirable as the information made is not information at all.
|
| 17:50 | irieger | troy_s: se6astian Which article are you talking about?
|
| 17:50 | troy_s | se6astian: Same goes for colorimetry work, as the goal may be some perceptual reason or perhaps matching across footage etc.
|
| 17:52 | troy_s | se6astian: My caution point would be that folks interested in colorimetry would do the conversation well to frame and anchor all discussions based on the context in question. (In Apertus' case, “cinema” camera plays a large role, as with all of the design decisions thus far, which should equally steer discussions / debates / research accordingly.)
|
| 17:52 | troy_s | irieger: New post on Apertus.org
|
| 17:53 | troy_s | irieger: Hopefully my point is clear and not clear-like-mud. :)
|
| 17:53 | irieger | ah, missed that one today
|
| 17:54 | troy_s | It can be a tiring discussion largely because the same territory must be rehashed over and over; cross disciplinary paths are extremely complex to navigate.
|
| 17:55 | troy_s | I think it is at least part of the reason that folks lean to kitchen-sink applications and approaches because very few people are happy being immersed in a constant feeling of "I don't feel in control"
|
| 18:32 | se6astian | sorry troy_s, I assumed your original comment was about the new article release: https://www.apertus.org/second-AXIOM-workshop-at-Louis-Lumiere-school-article-November-2015
|
| 18:37 | troy_s | That is it se6astian
|
| 18:37 | troy_s | Was wondering if there was anything coming out of the effort yet or some of the design constraints / goals etc.
|
| 18:37 | troy_s | Looks great though.
|
| 18:54 | se6astian | the goal so far was more to to get students in touch with the technology, the philosophy and encourage them to dig deeper
|
| 19:11 | slikdigit | joined the channel |
| 19:56 | Bertl | off for now ... bbl
|
| 19:56 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_oO
|
| 21:25 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|