00:12 | legendin | left the channel | |
01:14 | wescotte | joined the channel | |
03:01 | aombk | if there is a pcie card with two or three hdmi inputs you can test your experimental 4k 180fps
| |
03:11 | Bertl | yup
| |
03:53 | Bertl | off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
| |
03:53 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
| |
04:00 | wescotte | left the channel | |
04:08 | wescotte | joined the channel | |
04:08 | wescotte | left the channel | |
05:18 | Gegsite | joined the channel | |
06:19 | Gegsite | left the channel | |
07:13 | PhilippeJ | joined the channel | |
08:32 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
| |
08:36 | se6astian | good morning
| |
08:37 | KurtAugust | joined the channel | |
08:41 | KurtAugust | Hi, a reply to a comment made yesterday --quote 20:56 aombk: this whole dslr blog/news sites thing is very disappointing. after having contacted many of them i am starting to believe most of them host ONLY paid articles/advertisements. 116 --end quote. To be honest, I think quite a few blogs have reported on it and you can't really blame them for not writing articles on Apertus daily as there is not anything really new to report
| |
08:54 | KurtAugust | Can I ask about the funding? So, you're still about 35k short... what are the options? Try to get some high profile spenders involved that don't mind donating a thousand euro? If you're counting on smaller donations, like 20 euro, you would almost need 2000 people, which I don't see happening soon. On the other hand, you have some so far. Loosing the budget that you have right now, would be so stupid. Is there an option to fill
| |
08:57 | legendn | joined the channel | |
08:57 | KurtAugust | last day of the indiegogo campain. I mean, if I need a loan and can show the bank I have already 70% of the budget covered, my chances are pretty good. Interest rates are low. Anyway, don't want to pry, but rather to help to reach your goal.
| |
09:17 | legendn | left the channel | |
09:26 | se6astian | KurtAugust: We appreciate your concerns
| |
09:26 | se6astian | statistically campaigns gain momentum at the end of their funding period
| |
09:26 | se6astian | so we have high hopes for a strong finish
| |
09:27 | se6astian | also we will announce some more big news today that hopefully get us some attention again
| |
09:35 | KurtAugust | Well, keep up the good vibe then! Normally, I keep out of the way of crowdsourcing campaigns, so my knowledge is very limited. I just would hate it if you should miss your appointment with history by a hair.
| |
09:57 | daFred | joined the channel | |
10:15 | KurtAugust | left the channel | |
10:16 | daFred | Is an option for the supporters to make a deposit of 2000 Eur? Maybe you don't get all the 100000 Eur for development but you want lose all the rest...
| |
10:23 | anton7 | joined the channel | |
10:25 | se6astian | daFred: you mean asking people for a downpayment for the 1900/2300€ alrady now?
| |
10:25 | anton7 | Hi, interesting that Hamster spoke of a milled metalic back serving as a heatsink for Zinq. I was wishing for exactly the same. The fan on top doesn't look that appealing.
| |
10:26 | se6astian | a heatsink alone is no solution, you need to not just collect the heat but also move it away somehow
| |
10:26 | anton7 | Creating vibrations, noise, taking a valuable mounting point, bringing in dust and debris
| |
10:27 | anton7 | Besides the its nice to have a strong metallic body - the lens can be heavy there can be follow focus
| |
10:29 | anton7 | Sebastian, if Zynq was connected to metallic camera back like a CPU to a heatsink wouldn't the back of the camera be large enough to pass the heat on to the outside air?
| |
10:29 | daFred | se6astian: yes, maybe a option for the last two days. Better then a stone on the head :-) ((austrian english...))
| |
10:32 | anton7 | http://i072.radikal.ru/1409/a5/4020892398b6.png
| |
10:34 | anton7 | The only reason i was not talking of the metal body with no fan earlier was bacause the crowdfunding campaign seemed and still seems a much bigger concern
| |
10:39 | daFred | What do you think about the stupid idea to use profiles like this http://www.item24.at/home/produkte/produktkatalog/produktdetails/products/konstruktionsprofile-12/128.html as a standard module housing?
| |
10:41 | se6astian | anton7: where would the connectors for the modules be in your concept?
| |
10:42 | se6astian | if we can find readily available parts for the modules that would be great
| |
10:42 | se6astian | but the Beta has the extensions module at the front sides not the back
| |
10:42 | se6astian | you are already planning the AXIOM Gamma :)
| |
10:44 | anton7 | Sebastian, didn't think hard of connectors... Maybe vertical on right and left so as not to interfere with vertical air flow?
| |
10:45 | anton7 | Anyway, my main point was that I'd love to see Beta in a metal body. If needed the back of the cam can have ribs as in my pic, possibly even allow a fan to be attached externally
| |
10:46 | anton7 | A sealed camera would have its advantages
| |
10:47 | anton7 | Also if the body is metal you can allow attachment holes to screw stuff right to the camera
| |
10:49 | se6astian | we wil hold another survey about the enclosure and see what people prefer
| |
10:49 | se6astian | the material choice will have a big influence on the manufacturing method and thus resulting price
| |
10:51 | anton7 | Fair enough
| |
10:51 | KurtAugust | joined the channel | |
10:51 | KurtAugust | http://www.ioindustries.com/provideo/products/4ksdi_overview.html Same sensor. Seems to do well without a fan.
| |
10:52 | anton7 | With a metal body _mayby_ you can save on a cage which may offset the extra cost
| |
10:55 | PhilippeJ | left the channel | |
10:55 | anton7 | Kurt, sensor sizes for 4ksdi is 22.5 x 11.88mm Is it really same sensor? Also Axiom is likely to run its Zynq much harder. Yet I would think that making the whole cam body into a heatsink may be sufficient.
| |
11:00 | anton7 | left the channel | |
11:03 | danieel | joined the channel | |
11:03 | KurtAugust | That's what IO told me at IBC. They're also somewhere mentioned in a Cmosis brochure. But yes, different processing. I do think it is essential to keep the sensor dirt free. Having it different would be a major design flaw.
| |
11:04 | KurtAugust | (of course, in my opinion)
| |
11:05 | KurtAugust | Both Arri (Alexa) and Sony (fs-7) are working with heatpipes. Cion seems to be pretty unprotected, though.
| |
11:07 | danieel | it is same sensor
| |
11:07 | danieel | do not confuse 4K and UHD
| |
11:08 | se6astian | also keep in mind the Beta is meant as a development kit, an affordable starting point to get many people involved, it is not meant to solve all issues and problems from day one
| |
11:10 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
| |
11:10 | Bertl | morning folks!
| |
11:10 | anton7 | joined the channel | |
11:13 | anton7 | KurtAugust: do the heatpipes on Arri etc go to the sensor only to the processor only or to both? In my view Beta needs no heatpipes for the processor as it can attach directly to a large external radiator - the back side of the cam
| |
11:16 | danieel | Bertl: DP is not TMDS and DP is better and cheaper than HDMI
| |
11:17 | danieel | anton7: in alexa there are two separate cooling circuits, one for sensor and one for electronics, so that they do not affect each other
| |
11:27 | Bertl | danieel: thanks for clarifying
| |
11:42 | PhilippeJ | joined the channel | |
12:24 | anton7 | Speaking on the cooling again - if it turns out that a metal camera body is not able to dissipate the heat from Zynq then it doesn't seem likely a small fan on the top would do the job either. Then ribs on the back side and a large external fan still look like a better choice.
| |
12:28 | Bertl | well, maybe build both and test the options, note that the main purpose of the fan on top is to cool the sensor, not the zynq
| |
12:29 | Bertl | we are always open to suggestions, especially if they come with good arguments, like for example test results
| |
12:45 | anton7 | left the channel | |
12:45 | daFred | the tube in front of the sensor is a big heat sink. We also can add some ribs at the outside of the tube...
| |
12:46 | Bertl | if it is made of metal, then yes
| |
12:46 | Bertl | but note that the sensor does heat up on the back more than on the front/side
| |
12:49 | daFred | and there are all the pins, so we need airflow!
| |
12:55 | anton7 | joined the channel | |
12:59 | anton7 | Well this guy nightskyinfocus.com/diyprojects/canon-450d-dslr-modification was able to drive a copper plate under d450 sensor despite the pins. Not sure if it is possible with the sensor board designed for Beta. Perhaps might be a good idea too see if the board could be designed in such a way that this option is left open
| |
13:03 | Bertl | this is one concept we already considered, we will see what is doable there and what not
| |
13:03 | Bertl | a main problem remains the rather expensive but otherwise primitive socket for the CMV12k
| |
13:04 | Bertl | so it would really help to find alternative socket solutions for the CMV12k pingrid
| |
13:11 | anton7 | €90 for a socket! Wow
| |
13:12 | anton7 | EUR 90 I mean..
| |
13:28 | danieel | well, they are priced same whatever the layout is
| |
13:31 | anton7 | Well once the socket has been soldered to the board perhaps one could take a dremel or wire cutters to the socket to remove the side walls and allow the metal plate to go under?
| |
13:36 | anton7 | Or perhaps for that price (and it does look like these sockets are custom made) they could make side walls in such a shape that it is easier to remove them after soldering - e.g. easier to break off
| |
13:39 | Bertl | Andon wasn't very cooperative in regard of changing anything, well, I'm sure they would for the right price, but do you want to pay the same for sensor and socket? :)
| |
13:39 | Bertl | so searching for viable alternatives would be a good start
| |
13:40 | Bertl | I had a look at the so-called peel-away sockets, which might be suitable for the purpose
| |
13:40 | Bertl | (but we haven't heard back from the companies offering them yet)
| |
13:45 | se6astian | even after contacting them several times and through different channels
| |
13:45 | se6astian | it appears they dont want to sell us anything
| |
13:46 | danieel | i had no problem with andon, they were quite surprised that I know of a product which is "future" and the sockets were instantly ready (for KAC)
| |
13:56 | anton7 | Department of stupid ideas here: cut a hole in the pcb under the sensor and drive a cleverly shaped metal plate from the bottom side. If the socket is surface mounted this may be easier
| |
13:58 | aombk | the campaign seems to have had a push forward for some reason
| |
13:58 | aombk | can you understand what did it from something?
| |
14:00 | Bertl | I guess it is the ML team-up
| |
14:01 | Bertl | danieel: so you got a socket which allows you to properly cool the sensor? care to share the details?
| |
14:04 | danieel | anton7: not a stupid idea
| |
14:04 | danieel | http://home.rozsnyo.com/kac-sensor-socket-board.jpeg
| |
14:08 | danieel | uncooled sensor without any thermal management gets to at most 45deg (internal reading).. so you should rather cool/separate the fpga, than care about a sensor (big package with relatively low power)
| |
14:10 | Bertl | what a shame that danieel doesn't share his designs ...
| |
14:25 | PhilippeJ | It would be interestng to test if the most important is having the sensor as cool as possible, or have the same temperature all the time (which is a bit different), for correct calibration for instance.
| |
14:25 | danieel | of course the 2nd... look at arri
| |
14:29 | Bertl | both is relevant, higher temperature on the sensor means exponentially more thermal noise
| |
14:30 | Bertl | constant temperature means predictable noise pattern
| |
14:30 | danieel | it is not about predictability, rather to say - stability
| |
14:31 | danieel | predicting noise would be like winning the lottery, no?
| |
14:31 | Bertl | nobody said anything about predicting noise
| |
14:34 | danieel | then what you have meant?
| |
14:35 | Bertl | I meant what I wrote, it gives a predictable noise pattern
| |
14:36 | Bertl | as the noise changes with temperature, the pattern changes as well
| |
14:36 | Bertl | so compensation and algorithms have to adapt to the changes
| |
14:37 | KurtAugust | left the channel | |
14:49 | PhilippeJ | do you know at what temperature the fpga runs curently in alpha, and at what max temp it can run?
| |
14:51 | Bertl | depends on the actual FPGA used, but typically 85+ °C is fine for the FPGA
| |
14:52 | Bertl | for FPGA tempertures on the alpha you have to ask se6astian
| |
14:53 | Bertl | (it is available from the commandline at any time)
| |
14:56 | PhilippeJ | Thanks. 85° is pretty high, so I guess the sensor will need more cooling than the fpga.
| |
14:57 | Bertl | typically yes, as about 60°C for the sensor is already too high
| |
14:58 | se6astian | gotta go
| |
14:58 | se6astian | bbl
| |
14:58 | se6astian | big update ahead tonight :)
| |
14:58 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
| |
14:58 | aombk | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_cooling ?
| |
15:00 | Bertl | yes, we have been considering the use of Peltier elements, but it isn't trivial to attach them to the sensor
| |
15:01 | Bertl | it will definitely be the preferred solution for the AXIOM Gamma
| |
15:04 | anton7 | Ok the sensor needs to be cool. However which one produces more heat? If its Zynq might it be that it is enough to cool just the Zynq - so that it does not heat the sensor? And then the metal back would do the job?
| |
15:06 | anton7 | Re attaching the Peltier - have you seen what that guy did with Canon d450? He attached the copper plate to the sensor let the plate go outside and attached the Peltier between the copper plate and an external heatsink
| |
15:07 | anton7 | With a fan on the heatsink he got ice!
| |
15:07 | anton7 | The sensor went subzeri
| |
15:07 | anton7 | Subzero
| |
15:10 | anton7 | Well I don't know how much energy that takes of course
| |
15:10 | daFred | left the channel | |
15:12 | anton7 | Could be an upgrade pack for Beta - so long as you design it in such a way that it is possible to add later
| |
15:13 | Bertl | maybe
| |
15:14 | PhilippeJ | I have the feeling that Peltier cooling will consume too much power on battery. That's just a feeling :-)
| |
15:23 | daFred | joined the channel | |
15:23 | anton7 | even if zynq is well cooled and does not heat the sensor up and if the emphasis is on stability... and the battery is biggish... and there is a way to switch it off..
| |
15:30 | PhilippeJ | left the channel | |
15:38 | anton7 | Another idea: record sensor temp alongside raw, apply different noise compensation depending on temp in post.
| |
15:41 | anton7 | A Peltier can help build the profiles - by heating and cooling to a range of temperatures as needed
| |
15:44 | comradekingu | left the channel | |
15:45 | Bertl | yep, indeed an option ... please make sure to collect those ideas somewhere, preferably on the wiki
| |
15:46 | anton7 | Sure, shall we start a new page?
| |
15:47 | Bertl | if there isn't an appropriate page somewhere, then by all means yes
| |
15:53 | anton7 | left the channel | |
16:36 | anton7 | joined the channel | |
16:39 | anton7 | Updated: http://wiki.apertus.org/index.php?title=Cooling and http://wiki.apertus.org/index.php?title=Noise_Reduction
| |
16:58 | aombk | Peltier devices also generate electricity
| |
16:59 | Bertl | if there is a temperature difference, yes, i.e. it is the reverse operation
| |
17:04 | anton7 | left the channel | |
17:07 | aombk | Panasonic PGS looks very interesting
| |
17:20 | philippej | joined the channel | |
17:21 | Gegsite | joined the channel | |
17:23 | philippej | take this one for example : http://www.unitednuclear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=27_37&products_id=456
| |
17:24 | philippej | max 9A @ 15V :-/
| |
17:24 | Bertl | yeah, I have some of those on my shelf
| |
17:25 | Bertl | but it doesn't mean that you have to use it at the highest current
| |
17:27 | philippej | realistically I'd say, it cant' draw more than one amp at 15V if it is to be battery powered
| |
17:28 | Bertl | that is 15 Watt, multiply it with the efficiency and you get the potential heat transport
| |
17:32 | anton7 | joined the channel | |
17:33 | anton7 | Need to compare that with how much CMV12000 and/or Zynq is drawing, right?
| |
17:33 | Legendin | joined the channel | |
17:33 | aquarat | left the channel | |
17:39 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
| |
17:41 | anton7 | Actually CMV12000 spreadsheet lists power consumption of only 2W
| |
17:41 | philippej | left the channel | |
17:42 | aquarat | joined the channel | |
17:43 | se6astian | back
| |
17:47 | Gegsite | sexy?
| |
17:48 | aquarat | left the channel | |
17:49 | se6astian | you find my back sexy? :)
| |
17:50 | Gegsite | its a Q haha
| |
17:55 | aquarat | joined the channel | |
18:03 | KurtAugust | joined the channel | |
18:08 | se6astian | any native speakers here?
| |
18:08 | se6astian | new update release immanent
| |
18:08 | philippej | joined the channel | |
18:08 | se6astian | would hate to release it full of errors again :)
| |
18:08 | se6astian | like the last update
| |
18:08 | se6astian | ah philippej
| |
18:08 | se6astian | you can have a look please
| |
18:11 | intracube | se6astian: I can take a look
| |
18:12 | se6astian | great
| |
18:12 | intracube | se6astian: and I've spoken to a moderator at blenderartists.org about posting about the axiom project in their News section
| |
18:12 | intracube | I'm doing a draft post for that now
| |
18:14 | Bertl | great! appreciated!
| |
18:20 | se6astian | wunderful!
| |
18:20 | Bertl | s/u/o/
| |
18:20 | intracube | how do I comment/chat in googledocs?
| |
18:21 | intracube | oops, I might have closed some message there
| |
18:22 | intracube | it looks odd having the prices to three decimal places
| |
18:26 | wescotte | joined the channel | |
18:29 | Gegsite | left the channel | |
18:32 | philippej | left the channel | |
19:07 | aombk | the campaign looks like it might slowly but steady take off.
| |
19:08 | intracube | will the 16mm variant do 60fps initially?
| |
19:12 | se6astian | very likely yes
| |
19:12 | aombk | se6astian Bertl heres an idea. for developers who cant afford or dont care about the sensor and resolution and fps etc but want to do tests, maybe you could offer a version with a crappy and small sensor.
| |
19:12 | se6astian | as we can already output 108ßp60 on the Alpha
| |
19:13 | se6astian | the 16mm is small and affordable, not crappy though :)
| |
19:13 | Bertl | aombk: the cmv2000/4000 can be considered a crappy and small sensor :)
| |
19:13 | se6astian | it wont get much cheaper than that?
| |
19:13 | se6astian | it wont get much cheaper than that!
| |
19:14 | aombk | about how much do these sensors cost?
| |
19:15 | intracube | the only thing that might be confusing about the new release is the first image is a bit ambiguous about the frame rates
| |
19:16 | intracube | it's not clear if it's the sensor's capability or the camera at launch
| |
19:16 | Bertl | the cameras capability at launch will probably be like 1FPS
| |
19:17 | KurtAugust | left the channel | |
19:17 | intracube | then it would be worth saying that!
| |
19:17 | Bertl | as we plan to finish the hardware first and work on the software while already shipping the devices
| |
19:17 | anton7 | left the channel | |
19:18 | Bertl | but it isn't relevant, because the software updates will allow to utilize the Beta to the full extent
| |
19:18 | Bertl | if you want to get highest framerate when the device is shipped, just let us know and we'll defer shipping till we 'finished' the software
| |
19:19 | Bertl | do not make the error to compare the AXIOM with commercial cameras
| |
19:19 | intracube | Bertl: I'm just concerned there might be some vocal people who complain that the camera that just arrived in the post can only do 1fps
| |
19:20 | Bertl | there is no 'launch date' there is no fixed software, there is no artificial limit
| |
19:20 | Bertl | I'm pretty sure we will get those
| |
19:20 | Bertl | there are always folks who do not get the big picture
| |
19:21 | Bertl | but as I said, communication is key, we will ask folks and those who do not want the hardware early, will get the hardware when the software is 'useable'
| |
19:22 | intracube | ^ yes, this is key
| |
19:23 | intracube | have 'earliest adopter' group that know in advance the limitations before
| |
19:23 | intracube | and a 'main' group for people that want a basic (but usable) test camera to arrive in the post
| |
19:24 | se6astian | I will change the first image
| |
19:24 | se6astian | but how exactly?
| |
19:24 | intracube | of course 'usable' will mean many things to many people :P
| |
19:24 | se6astian | leave out FPS?
| |
19:24 | Bertl | it is not that we fund the camera, we are funding the development, so all the numbers are basically guestimates
| |
19:25 | Bertl | I'm pretty sure we will surpass all the given numbers sooner or later
| |
19:25 | anton7 | joined the channel | |
19:25 | intracube | se6astian: if it can be made clear that it's the image sensor's capabilities then it would be OK to keep FPS
| |
19:26 | intracube | se6astian: the Super35 specs also list 4096x3072 which won't be an output option at launch
| |
19:26 | se6astian | hmm, quite tricky
| |
19:26 | se6astian | explaining that takes a lot of text/space
| |
19:26 | Bertl | url for the image in question?
| |
19:26 | se6astian | that space we do not have in the image
| |
19:26 | intracube | so possibly better to make clear on the image that the data is all the image sensor capability
| |
19:26 | intracube | hmm
| |
19:27 | se6astian | if I just write "Image Sensors Specs" above the table nobody will realize what that means....
| |
19:27 | Bertl | to me it is clear that the FPS is sensor max
| |
19:27 | intracube | maybe somewhere 'Image Sensor hardware capabilities' could be put on the image
| |
19:27 | Bertl | why would the max Frame Rate refer to the camera when everything else refers to the sensor
| |
19:27 | intracube | se6astian: yes, it's difficult :/
| |
19:28 | Bertl | IMHO it is perfectly fine, if you really want to emphasize on it
| |
19:28 | Bertl | make everything below Image Sensor a bullet list
| |
19:29 | Bertl | then it should be clear for everybody that the values refer to the sensor
| |
19:35 | se6astian | updated the google doc
| |
19:35 | se6astian | added a sentence above the specs
| |
19:36 | se6astian | basically what we have in the crowdfunding page already
| |
19:37 | anton7 | left the channel | |
19:38 | intracube | se6astian: that looks good
| |
19:41 | intracube | there will always be people interested in the project who are wildly optimistic and only briefly glance at the details
| |
19:41 | intracube | so it's good to spell it out :)
| |
19:42 | Bertl | perfect
| |
19:42 | se6astian | great :)
| |
19:53 | anton6 | joined the channel | |
19:54 | anton6 | changed nick to: anton3
| |
20:02 | intracube | are the monochrome sensors the same as the normal versions but with the RGB colour filters removed?
| |
20:03 | aombk | yes
| |
20:03 | intracube | can users modify the colour sensors to make them monochrome?
| |
20:04 | intracube | or would damage result :)
| |
20:05 | aombk | i dont know for sure but i believe this will not be possible
| |
20:06 | aombk | but it would be great!
| |
20:06 | intracube | aombk: ah ok :)
| |
20:06 | aombk | we could test various bayer patterns
| |
20:06 | intracube | I'd be terrified of performing surgery on a £1,000 sensor though
| |
20:07 | Legendin | left the channel | |
20:07 | Bertl | no chance, those are micro filters directly attached to the microlenses
| |
20:07 | Bertl | so trying to modify those would very likely destroy the sensor
| |
20:07 | aombk | i am never terrified about doing these kind of things
| |
20:07 | intracube | Bertl: ah, ok thanks
| |
20:08 | intracube | will there be an integrated infra-red filter on the cameras?
| |
20:08 | aombk | thats because i know for sure it will end up in a catastrophe
| |
20:08 | intracube | that would be a nice option to have
| |
20:08 | Bertl | intracube: nope
| |
20:08 | aombk | olpf?
| |
20:09 | Bertl | but you can probably attach filters to the inner side of the lensmount if you prefer to have them fixed
| |
20:09 | intracube | Bertl: cool :) I'd love to do some infra-red photography or video
| |
20:12 | Bertl | aombk: no olpf planned, at least not internal
| |
20:14 | aombk | oh,i see now olpf and ir filters are no that expensive
| |
20:15 | KurtAugust | joined the channel | |
20:16 | KurtAugust | please reconsider OLPF. Image really looks amateuristic without, or at least think about making it swappable, like in some Red cameras.
| |
20:16 | intracube | aombk: what prices have you found for the OLPFs?
| |
20:16 | intracube | this company does addons for DSLR users: http://store.mosaicengineering.com/
| |
20:16 | intracube | not cheap, it has to be said
| |
20:18 | daFred | left the channel | |
20:18 | anton3 | KurtAugust: pls pardon my ignorance.. can the effect of olpf be imitated in post via a software algorithm?
| |
20:19 | aombk | anton3, not really
| |
20:19 | intracube | anton3: some of the effect can be reduced, but not eliminated
| |
20:19 | Bertl | there are pros and cons for the OLPF, so we won't force it on the end user
| |
20:19 | aombk | intracube, i found these http://www.optics-online.com/lpf.asp but they are small
| |
20:22 | KurtAugust | I tried some blur on the test footage, but the girl's cheek still has some awkward green and red dots in the highlight. You want people to look natural right? image here: http://www.blog.kurtaugustyns.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/AXIOM-Alpha-Sample-Footage-Selection-Ungraded-0014007b.jpg
| |
20:22 | KurtAugust | and everything in post costs money too...
| |
20:23 | KurtAugust | also the color moiree in the test footage at the horse race. quite annoying to me.
| |
20:23 | intracube | KurtAugust: yes, it'd be a necessary addon for a lot of people
| |
20:25 | intracube | and it's not just a case of finding a OLPF that's the correct size
| |
20:25 | KurtAugust | i think it will greatly differentiate it from a "machine vision" look
| |
20:25 | intracube | it needs to be carefully matched to the size/density of the sensor photosites
| |
20:25 | aombk | Bertl, you dont have to force it on the user but you can test some after release and evaluate and maybe your backers can make a bulk order through you for reduced prices?
| |
20:27 | aombk | anyway i personally consider olpf a small detail
| |
20:29 | aombk | you know, nikon charges more for the model with olpf removed :P
| |
20:46 | Bertl | if we have enough money to test filters, we will probably do it at some point
| |
20:46 | Bertl | for the start, we will focus on the camera :)
| |
20:46 | Bertl | I'm off for a nap now ... bbl
| |
20:47 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
| |
20:55 | aombk | do you people know anything similar to adobe onlocation?
| |
20:56 | aombk | or scopebox
| |
21:09 | se6astian | new crowdfunding update posted
| |
21:09 | se6astian | I see a massive visitor spike already
| |
21:09 | se6astian | will be interesting to see what the night will bring...
| |
21:15 | intracube | added thread on blenderartists: http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?350470-Open-Cinema-Camera-Campaign-Apertus-AXIOM-Beta
| |
21:19 | KurtAugust | Really love the addition of a 16mm sensor. I was just about to ask about an option for the Truesense chip found in the Ikonoskop and Digital Bolex. I love some depth of field. Is the CMV2000 the same family as the CMV12000. It would be nice to have matching colors for people using both 16mm chip and super35. Very nice update!
| |
21:22 | se6astian | KurtAugust: great you like it
| |
21:22 | se6astian | ikonoskop/DB use a CCD sensor
| |
21:22 | se6astian | rather hard to interface
| |
21:22 | se6astian | plus very limited with FPS
| |
21:23 | jebba | joined the channel | |
21:23 | se6astian | some people still claim CCD is superior to CMOS - just like some people say that about analog film (where I tend to agree more)
| |
21:24 | KurtAugust | Well, cmos has come a long way since the Ikonoskop team started playing with that Kodak chip.
| |
21:25 | KurtAugust | And some years have passed too.
| |
21:30 | wescotte | Does IndieGoGo give you traffic details? Curious where today's spike is coming from.
| |
21:30 | Gegsite | joined the channel | |
21:31 | se6astian | wescotte: great to see you supported us as well!
| |
21:31 | se6astian | yes there are stats
| |
21:31 | se6astian | but they lag behind a bit
| |
21:31 | se6astian | so I will be able to tell tomorrow
| |
21:31 | wescotte | Wish I could afford more but I'm out of work currently :(
| |
21:32 | se6astian | well every donation counts no matter how small it is!
| |
21:33 | wescotte | Hopefully I get a gig by weeks end so I can up my donation a little.
| |
21:34 | KurtAugust | left the channel | |
21:34 | wescotte | Also, when do you guys think you'll hear back from the Horizon 2020 people?
| |
21:35 | wescotte | nevermind.. webpage says 5 months. dunno how I missed that
| |
21:36 | wescotte | So that could be any day now too
| |
21:38 | se6astian | soon
| |
21:40 | intracube | the donations have picked up today! now almost 70k:)
| |
21:40 | Legendin | joined the channel | |
21:41 | Gegsite | left the channel | |
21:50 | se6astian | time for bed
| |
21:50 | se6astian | hope to wake up tomorrow to see we passed the 70k mark :)
| |
21:51 | se6astian | good night
| |
21:54 | Legendin | G'nite!
| |
21:55 | intracube | goodnight!
| |
22:09 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
| |
22:10 | Legendin | left the channel | |
22:17 | anton2 | joined the channel | |
22:19 | anton3 | left the channel | |
22:24 | jebba | left the channel | |
22:36 | anton2 | left the channel | |
22:58 | wescotte | left the channel | |
23:14 | AndroUser2 | joined the channel | |
23:14 | AndroUser2 | Hmm is smth wrong with irc logs server?
| |
23:22 | intracube | AndroUser2: what do you mean?
| |
23:23 | AndroUser2 | Pls try http://irc.apertus.org
| |
23:23 | AndroUser2 | I see a page that is almost empty
| |
23:24 | intracube | yeah, I don't know why. direct link to today: http://irc.apertus.org/index.php?day=30&month=09&year=2014
| |
23:24 | AndroUser2 | Thx
|