| 01:04 | fsteinel | joined the channel |
| 01:08 | fsteinel_ | left the channel |
| 01:49 | ItsMeLenny | joined the channel |
| 04:04 | dmjnova | joined the channel |
| 07:40 | jucar | joined the channel |
| 07:54 | Andrej74 | left the channel |
| 08:04 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 08:04 | se6astian | good morning
|
| 09:10 | danieel | left the channel |
| 09:33 | danieel | joined the channel |
| 09:50 | Jin|away | changed nick to: Jin^eLD
|
| 09:51 | ItsMeLenny | left the channel |
| 10:00 | tezburma | joined the channel |
| 10:26 | ItsMeLenny | joined the channel |
| 11:26 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
|
| 11:26 | Bertl | morning folks!
|
| 12:04 | intracube | joined the channel |
| 12:39 | jucar | left the channel |
| 13:37 | aombk2 | i didnt know there is this term for all this, but you fit perfectly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy
|
| 13:43 | ItsMeLenny | RIP dennis ritchie
|
| 14:42 | danieel | the mailing list shows positiveness with the future MFT fairchild sensor... but the so far response (from indiegogo) was strongly in favor of larger optical aperture
|
| 14:42 | intracube | there was a rendering of the Beta showing a heatsink/fins layout a couple of weeks back
|
| 14:42 | intracube | does anyone know where I might find it?
|
| 14:44 | intracube | I couldn't see it in the wiki
|
| 14:47 | jucar | joined the channel |
| 14:48 | Bertl | se6astian probably knows
|
| 14:49 | Bertl | danieel: yeah, I'm still curious what sensors folks will actually use with the Beta
|
| 14:56 | se6astian | intracube: https://lab.apertus.org/T310
|
| 14:57 | intracube | se6astian: ah, yep. thanks :)
|
| 15:08 | jucar | left the channel |
| 15:59 | dmjnova | left the channel |
| 16:16 | dmjnova | joined the channel |
| 16:23 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 16:32 | jucar | joined the channel |
| 16:41 | jucar | left the channel |
| 16:43 | slikdigit | joined the channel |
| 16:43 | slikdigit | left the channel |
| 16:43 | slikdigit | joined the channel |
| 16:48 | intracube | mad question: could the sensor be rotated 90 degrees relative to the other PCBs?
|
| 16:48 | jucar | joined the channel |
| 16:48 | intracube | then the cam could be left/right symmetrical and have space for support rails to be mounted
|
| 16:48 | intracube | https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gaXvc3Z7iS4/VTpGIEEcUII/AAAAAAAABEA/U_MdPci-btg/w505-h742-no/apertus_beta_rotate.png
|
| 17:04 | ItsMeLenny | left the channel |
| 17:07 | Bertl | we already had that question twice, the short version is:
|
| 17:08 | Bertl | not with the default PCB stackup, but by adding a "rotation" board right before the sensor board yes
|
| 17:08 | Bertl | (or by designing a special 90 deg sensor board version)
|
| 17:09 | Bertl | as the sensor board is already rotation symmetrical (180 deg) it would then be possible to cover all 90 deg increments
|
| 17:15 | Bertl | off for now ... bbl
|
| 17:15 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_oO
|
| 17:43 | intracube | Bertl_oO: good to know
|
| 17:59 | davidak | joined the channel |
| 18:14 | g3gg0 | joined the channel |
| 18:22 | Jin^eLD | changed nick to: Jin|away
|
| 19:50 | danieel | left the channel |
| 22:22 | tezburma | left the channel |
| 22:48 | danieel | joined the channel |
| 23:46 | aombk3 | joined the channel |
| 23:47 | aombk2 | left the channel |
| 00:23 | g3gg0 | left the channel |
| 00:32 | davidak | left the channel |