07:45 | se6astian | good day
| |
07:45 | se6astian | vup/anuejn cool idea
| |
07:45 | se6astian | lets give it a try
| |
08:48 | se6astian | how/where can the bridge be installed?
| |
12:50 | se6astian | openmoko replied pretty fat
| |
12:50 | se6astian | *fast
| |
12:50 | se6astian | impressive work.
| |
12:50 | se6astian | hardware: copyright author, license, and date are present in the schematic sheet (well done). small remark: the files seem to have last been modified in 2021, but some copyright dates are from 2014-2015, while other are from 2020. Since the dates across the pages are different I suppose they are correct.
| |
12:50 | se6astian | software: the main axiom firmware repo source files have copyright author, license, and date.
| |
12:50 | se6astian | there a just a few details that need to be fixed before I can grant the IEEE ID:
| |
12:50 | se6astian | hardware: could you export the schematic (as pdf) and board (as gerber/excellon) so people without Eagle CAD can also see it (see hardware point 6 in our README)? these exported fabrication files don't have to be in the source repository. I found some schematic export in the wiki (https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/Resources), but not for all schematic, and not the gerbers.
| |
12:50 | se6astian | software: some of the main repo submodule source files don't have copyright author, license, and date (for example, but not only nctrl). The LICENSE file is there, but this is not sufficient. Could you add this information? (see software point 4 in our README)
| |
12:55 | Spirit532 | left the channel | |
12:55 | Spirit532 | joined the channel | |
12:55 | vup | se6astian: I think matterbridge is supposed to be decent
| |
12:56 | vup | well adding a license header to ever source file will take a moment
| |
12:56 | se6astian | yeah...
| |
13:41 | se6astian | could we automate it
| |
13:41 | se6astian | at least to indentify the files
| |
13:41 | se6astian | we need to adapt
| |
13:43 | vup | yeah
| |
13:44 | vup | I am already working through some parts
| |
13:44 | vup | Bertl_oO: under what license do you want to put the binary files currently present in axiom-firmware (the machxo2 and zynq bitstreams for example)
| |
14:09 | Bertl_oO | hmm, good question, no idea?
| |
14:09 | Bertl_oO | I'm not even sure what our options are there ...
| |
14:32 | vup | I think some form of creative commons might be suitable?
| |
14:50 | Bertl_oO | probably
| |
17:39 | davidak[m] | hello! do you know anything about using fuji x mount lenses on the axiom beta? i did some research and it does not look good. you can't even manual focus without communicating with the camera
| |
17:39 | davidak[m] | should i add my research results to the wiki?
| |
17:46 | davidak[m] | Discord is terrible btw. use matrix instead. i'm here using matrix
| |
18:16 | se6astian | ah, thanks for the discord input
| |
18:16 | se6astian | I have no experience with fuji lenses but let me look into the FFD, etc.
| |
18:17 | se6astian | FFD fuji xmount is 17.7 mm
| |
18:17 | se6astian | vs emount 18mm
| |
18:17 | se6astian | that indeed makes it impossible
| |
18:17 | se6astian | at least with the current lens mount
| |
18:18 | se6astian | would be "easy" to build a shorter fuji x mount if we find a lens bayonet ring
| |
18:18 | se6astian | that of course only solves the mechanical side
| |
18:18 | se6astian | lens communication is a whole other topic
| |
18:35 | davidak[m] | where did you get the e-mount bayonet ring? maybe they also have x mount
| |
18:37 | davidak[m] | fuji said they open the protocol for lens manufacturers with NDA in 2020. that probably does not help us
| |
18:38 | davidak[m] | there is a forum post from 2017 where someone claims they might be able to reverse engineer it, but there is no update on that. someone could ask them https://www.fujix-forum.com/threads/af-adapter-for-fuji.67029/
| |
18:38 | vup | Bertl_oO: so what do you think about CC-BY-SA-4.0 for the bitstreams?
| |
18:39 | davidak[m] | at least the lens manufacturer Viltrox has reverse engineered the protocol. maybe the would sell the knowledge
| |
18:40 | davidak[m] | this is also probably reverse engineered https://www.fringeradapter.com/nikon-f-to-fujifilm-x
| |
18:41 | se6astian | we got the bayonet from a macro extension tube
| |
18:41 | vup | I mean actually reverse engineering the protocol is probably not that hard given a setup where one can capture traces during camera operation
| |
18:42 | vup | (unless they do some kind of authentication or encryption, but that seems unlikely?)
| |
18:42 | davidak[m] | there seem to be some people that are able to do it... we could pay them. any idea what that might cost?
| |
18:42 | vup | I don't think paying someone to do that is worth it
| |
18:42 | vup | we can probably do it ourselves
| |
18:43 | davidak[m] | so can i pay you (the team) to get it done?
| |
18:43 | se6astian | we also planed to do it for canon but so far noone did it :)
| |
18:44 | davidak[m] | otherwise i would not be able to use the nice lenses i bought on the axiom
| |
18:44 | se6astian | but yes, I think the challenge is actually too trivial for most people who like technical challenges :)
| |
18:44 | vup | do they not have manual focus?
| |
18:44 | vup | :P
| |
18:44 | davidak[m] | that sounds good :D
| |
18:45 | davidak[m] | they are focused "by-wire", even when using the manual focus
| |
18:46 | vup | interesting
| |
18:46 | davidak[m] | most small mirrorless lenses seem to work this way. also e-mau
| |
18:47 | davidak[m] | nt
| |
18:53 | vup | hmm well I assume you have a x-mount compatible camera? can you take some high res pictures of the electrical connections on the camera and the lens side?
| |
18:57 | vup | Bertl_oO: also do you have the cam job files for eagle for the various boards somewhere?
| |
18:57 | se6astian | I can offer to take care of the mechanical side if we find someone to deal with hardware and software
| |
18:59 | davidak[m] | <se6astian> "we got the bayonet from a..." <- so something like this https://www.ebay.de/itm/293281342455?hash=item4448ee23f7:g:Hv4AAOSwaOFdptoJ (quiet expensive)
| |
19:00 | vup | oh such extension tube set looks perfect to intercept the signals to the lens while its connected to the camera
| |
19:00 | vup | (without soldering to the camera
| |
19:00 | vup | )
| |
19:01 | vup | davidak[m]: if you can find a passive extension tube they tend to be a lot cheaper
| |
19:02 | davidak[m] | yes, under 10 euro from china. would that be enough?
| |
19:05 | vup | well with a passive one the electrical connection is probably inaccessible, but maybe it can be modified to access them (drilling some holes or so)
| |
19:05 | davidak[m] | it would be perfect if fuji would sell replacement parts for the camera bayonet. we could als as a company... but they probably don't
| |
19:05 | vup | not sure what se6astian is envisioning for the electrical connections
| |
19:08 | se6astian | yes such extension tube should work
| |
19:09 | davidak[m] | https://www.ebay.de/itm/402288360489?hash=item5daa413c29:g:v-QAAOSwpDdVQc-C 2x active mount for less than 25 euro, from china
| |
19:09 | davidak[m] | https://www.ebay.de/itm/331609584289?hash=item4d3578b2a1:g:EDQAAMXQ0pNRuXUo 3x passive mount for less than 10 euro, from china
| |
19:09 | Bertl_oO | vup: CC-BY-SA-4.0 is fine for me
| |
19:10 | vup | great
| |
19:10 | Bertl_oO | vup: se6astian was doing the recent Eagle CAM stuff
| |
19:10 | Bertl_oO | (used for the panels)
| |
19:10 | vup | I see
| |
19:11 | se6astian | https://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema/pcb-paneliser/tree/master/input/base_variant
| |
19:11 | se6astian | that are the gerbers created for panelization
| |
19:12 | vup | I think we should maybe start collecting all schematics, boards, gerbers in a central location, currently there are a multitude of locations for them
| |
19:12 | vup | (bertls file server, files.apertus.org, github)
| |
19:12 | davidak[m] | se6astian: should i extend https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/Lens_Mounts with information and pictures of mount?
| |
19:12 | vup | (multiple repos on github)
| |
19:12 | se6astian | that would be great davidak[m]!
| |
19:12 | davidak[m] | will do the next days
| |
19:13 | se6astian | thanks
| |
19:14 | se6astian | sniffing protocol is probably the first step before creating any own hardware or mechanical parts
| |
19:14 | se6astian | that should be possible with a fuji camera, fuji lens and such an active macro extension tube
| |
19:14 | se6astian | the lines should be easy to intercept in there
| |
19:15 | se6astian | next step once the protocol is known would probably be some kind of hardware proof of concept with a microcontroller that drives the pins?
| |
19:16 | se6astian | then next step custom hardware and mechanical parts
| |
19:16 | vup | se6astian: well accessing the pins is not 'trivial' as you probably need to position pogo pins agains them somehow
| |
19:17 | vup | (atleast without just soldering to the pads)
| |
19:17 | vup | but yeah
| |
19:17 | se6astian | https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/Commlite_e-mount_teardown
| |
19:18 | se6astian | in the emount adapter there was a small PCB with springs and pogopins indeed
| |
19:18 | se6astian | https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/Lens_Mounts
| |
19:18 | se6astian | but soldering cables to the pads should be possible somehow I assume
| |
19:19 | vup | sure that works for reverse engineering, but not really nice for a final setup
| |
19:19 | se6astian | true
| |
19:20 | se6astian | but a very simple custom pcb could solve that
| |
19:20 | se6astian | using the original pogo pins from the macro extension tube
| |
19:24 | davidak[m] | i thought, when we can control the focus from software, a follow focus system would be easy. we don't have to attach any motors to the lens...
| |
19:25 | se6astian | if its possible to drive the internal focus that precisely yes
| |
19:28 | davidak[m] | slightly different topic: i found out about lidar autofocus https://chaos.social/@davidak/107271759408109604
| |
19:28 | davidak[m] | check out the second video link
| |
19:28 | davidak[m] | could we use that for our autofocus?
| |
19:28 | davidak[m] | the hardware could be not that expensive
| |
19:28 | davidak[m] | but it seem not to work at long range
| |
19:29 | se6astian | lidar would be interesting not just for distance measuring but also 3d depth mapping of the footage you are shooting
| |
19:29 | se6astian | but I have not see any off the shelf lidar modules that we could easily integrate
| |
19:30 | davidak[m] | should i create an issue to collect research?
| |
19:30 | se6astian | I mean a "single pixel" aka distance meter would be another thing of course
| |
19:30 | se6astian | there is https://www.sparkfun.com/products/16977
| |
19:32 | se6astian | collective research sounds good
| |
19:33 | davidak[m] | that does not look much different from the DJI module from the outside
| |
19:34 | se6astian | I am afraid the internals are completely different
| |
19:34 | davidak[m] | very interesting possibilities we have when a system is open
| |
19:36 | se6astian | true but as I said I have not seen such system yet
| |
19:36 | se6astian | would be cool if one existed
| |
19:38 | Bertl_oO | LIDAR usually uses a rotating sensor, so even with 'one pixel' you get an almost 360 circle
| |
19:40 | se6astian | there is http://www.xaxxon.com/xaxxon/openlidar
| |
19:43 | Bertl_oO | not sure you want something rotating on your camera though :)
| |
19:43 | se6astian | yes, its not for us
| |
19:44 | se6astian | circle also does not help us much
| |
19:44 | se6astian | we need an actual 3d map
| |
19:45 | Bertl_oO | note that LIDAR basically uses ToF nowadays
| |
19:46 | se6astian | interesting
| |
19:46 | davidak[m] | FYI: i ordered the Auto Focus Macro Extension Tubes
| |
19:49 | se6astian | great
| |
19:50 | vup | Bertl_oO: wait how does LIDAR without ToF work?
| |
19:51 | davidak[m] | i can send them to you including with a camera and lens when you have time for the reverse engineering
| |
19:52 | davidak[m] | it's not time critical since it seem to take more time until i get my axiom beta (waiting for Power Board V2 and full enclosure)
| |
19:53 | se6astian | noted!
| |
19:53 | davidak[m] | currently i'm very happy with the fuji e-x3 camera :)
| |
19:57 | se6astian | nice
| |
20:43 | Bertl_oO | vup: as far as I know, early LIDAR used focal distance measurements
| |
20:46 | Bertl_oO | but what I actually meant is that ToF sensors are used nowadays instead of stand alone solutions
| |
21:16 | vup | interesting
| |
21:24 | vup | Bertl_oO: all scripts at https://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema/axiom-firmware/tree/main/software/scripts by you are gpl3.0-or-later, right?
| |
21:25 | Bertl_oO | by default they are gpl2, but I'm fine with gpl3+
| |
21:25 | vup | I don't care either way
| |
21:26 | Bertl_oO | then gpl2 it is :)
| |
21:26 | vup | ok
| |
21:48 | vup | Bertl_oO: are there any files under /root on fw 1.x you don't have the copyright to? (for example currently on BETA/HDMIRAW/sd.dd.xz)
| |
21:51 | Bertl_oO | good question, but probably no
| |
21:53 | vup | ok, ill use the file creation date for the copyright year, is that fine by you?
| |
22:07 | Bertl_oO | perfect
|