| 23:15 | mikkael | left the channel |
| 23:21 | jucar | joined the channel |
| 23:27 | jucar | left the channel |
| 23:34 | jucar | joined the channel |
| 23:41 | jucar | left the channel |
| 23:41 | jucar | joined the channel |
| 23:46 | jucar | left the channel |
| 00:19 | jucar | joined the channel |
| 00:26 | jucar | left the channel |
| 00:51 | jucar | joined the channel |
| 01:15 | jucar | left the channel |
| 01:44 | jucar | joined the channel |
| 02:36 | jucar1 | joined the channel |
| 02:37 | jucar | left the channel |
| 05:20 | Bertl | off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
|
| 05:31 | Sasha_C | left the channel |
| 06:08 | leo_m | left the channel |
| 06:26 | Sasha_C | joined the channel |
| 07:00 | philippe | joined the channel |
| 07:00 | philippe | changed nick to: Guest77590
|
| 07:01 | Guest77590 | changed nick to: philippej
|
| 08:00 | philippej | left the channel |
| 08:54 | Sasha_C | left the channel |
| 09:05 | Sasha_C | joined the channel |
| 09:06 | Sasha_C | left the channel |
| 11:07 | rexbron | left the channel |
| 11:08 | rexbron | joined the channel |
| 12:12 | intracube | joined the channel |
| 12:23 | S3bastian | joined the channel |
| 12:23 | S3bastian | good evening
|
| 12:28 | S3bastian | afternoon?
|
| 12:37 | mars_ | left the channel |
| 12:37 | mars_ | joined the channel |
| 12:39 | FergusL | hi here
|
| 12:40 | FergusL | afternoon I'd say
|
| 12:49 | leo_m | joined the channel |
| 12:52 | leo_m | hi everyone
|
| 12:57 | FergusL | hi leo_m
|
| 13:10 | S3bastian | hello!
|
| 13:46 | Bertl | morning everyone!
|
| 13:56 | S3bastian | hellO!
|
| 15:17 | S3bastian | left the channel |
| 15:39 | leo_m | left the channel |
| 17:09 | FergusL | Hey, is tiff a float format ? Cc troy_s
|
| 17:09 | FergusL | Cc rexbron
|
| 17:11 | Bertl | The inclusion of the SampleFormat tag in TIFF 6.0 allows TIFF files to handle advanced pixel data types, including integer images with more than 8 bits per channel and floating point images.
|
| 17:16 | philippe | joined the channel |
| 17:16 | philippe | changed nick to: Guest22341
|
| 17:18 | Guest22341 | changed nick to: philippej
|
| 17:31 | philippej | Hi everyone !
|
| 17:31 | Bertl | hey philippej!
|
| 17:32 | FergusL | thanks Bertl, I knew you were the kind of guy that print and pins all the relevant RFCs just above the computer screen on the wall
|
| 17:32 | philippej | Bertl, I got a reply from avnet, basically, they will at some point make a new board, but curently they are not yet in the design phase...
|
| 17:32 | Bertl | FergusL: virtually, yes
|
| 17:33 | Bertl | philippej: any ideas what the usual cycle for that would be?
|
| 17:33 | Bertl | i.e. one month design, one month testing? or one year design, no testing?
|
| 17:33 | philippej | "The only board we have today that would meet your requirements is the ZynQ MMP module AES-MMP-7Z045-G but it’s cost could be prohibitive. We have talked about building a 7015 board but don’t have it planned yet so it would be several months before it would be available for sale."
|
| 17:34 | philippej | "Does the CMV12000 allow you to double the data rate to 600Mbps? This would allow you to use a 32 bit interface to the MicroZed and leave enough pairs available to add an external high speed serializer for the SDI interface. This is probably the best solution we have at this time.
|
| 17:34 | philippej | I will keep your requirements in mind as we develop the spec for our 7015 boards. "
|
| 17:34 | Bertl | also the 7045 is a no-go for us, because the WebPack does not cover it
|
| 17:34 | philippej | I thought already abot it :-(
|
| 17:34 | philippej | this board is +- $1200
|
| 17:35 | philippej | is it an option to add an external serdes to the microzed and use half io of the sensor for now? does it make sense technically and economically ?
|
| 17:36 | Bertl | won't work, we wouldn't even have enough I/O ports port this
|
| 17:36 | Bertl | i.e. we could use even less lanes from the sensor, but that kind of fails the point
|
| 17:37 | Bertl | besides, I haven't had a chance to check out the microzed, but that will probably change soon
|
| 17:37 | philippej | do yo understand like me they are planing a new board in months (not years)?
|
| 17:38 | Bertl | well, my interpretation is, that it will take 'several' months, which is the usual vague hand-waving for 'some unknown time'
|
| 17:39 | Bertl | all it means is that it won't be available in the next few months
|
| 17:39 | philippej | yep
|
| 17:41 | philippej | I really wanted to find a solution that allows to develop now the software side and provide a lower end (cheaper, less risky) model, while allowing future upgrades ... :-/
|
| 17:42 | Bertl | as I said, I'm all for it, but I doubt it exists atm
|
| 17:42 | philippej | yeps
|
| 17:43 | FergusL | how does one deal with the glossiness of the IT8 paper ?
|
| 17:46 | Bertl | good question, one suggestion I've seen several times is to use really diffuse lighting and keep objects away from the paper
|
| 17:46 | FergusL | yes, that's the idea I guess
|
| 17:47 | philippej | and position the light such as the paper doesn't reflect :-)
|
| 17:48 | Bertl | well, with diffuse lighting there is no 'light' per se
|
| 17:48 | FergusL | I wonder if right now it could be a slight bummer for the profiling
|
| 17:50 | philippej | you just put it enough out of the axis of the camera
|
| 17:51 | Bertl | which would cause a problem with the uniformity
|
| 17:52 | Bertl | so you need at least two light sources to get somewhat reasonable results
|
| 17:53 | Bertl | it helps that the chart is relatively small, so with two larger light sources you have a good chance to illuminate it evenly
|
| 17:55 | FergusL | I've seen a chart shooting setup once, it had two diffuse light on the sides
|
| 17:55 | FergusL | camera right in front, more than 2m away for the chart
|
| 17:57 | Bertl | yep, sounds like a reasonable setup
|
| 17:57 | Bertl | light sources probably at 45° to the chart normal
|
| 17:58 | FergusL | yes
|
| 17:59 | FergusL | from the top of your head, do you remember if the IT8 shot is flipped ?
|
| 17:59 | Bertl | yes, it is flipped, so that it 'looks' normal
|
| 18:00 | Bertl | (i.e. the letters are readable)
|
| 18:01 | FergusL | I see
|
| 18:01 | FergusL | well it's still important for the debayering
|
| 18:01 | Bertl | register dump is at the end of the raw data
|
| 18:02 | FergusL | I know ! it follows the addresses in the cmv doc I guess ?
|
| 18:03 | Bertl | yes, precisely, 16bit each register from address 0 to 127
|
| 18:03 | FergusL | ok
|
| 18:18 | philippej | left the channel |
| 19:44 | gcolburn | joined the channel |
| 20:31 | dmj_nova | left the channel |
| 21:36 | dmj_nova | joined the channel |
| 22:27 | gcolburn | left the channel |
| 22:34 | gcolburn | joined the channel |
| 22:45 | troy_s | FergusL: There may be a float version, but mostly int as I know.
|