#apertus IRC Channel Logs

Which might be an improvement.

alexML: Sadly, it increased.

alexML: And peak err = 9.316373, avg err = 3.964185 off the original. So your tweaks made it worse.

Granted, se6astian|away really needs to _please_ give me some direct sun with direct sky 5000k shots of the Hutch, with nicely bracketed range from blown out to dark would be great.

That said, all of irieger's work appears vastly solid in terms of twiddling the registers. A delta e of 3.9 on less-than-optimal sources is so much improved over the previous Alpha's results.

yes

good morning

direct sunlight will be a rarity in the next couple of wheeks though I am afraid, but we will see what we can do :=

Even cloudy should be somewhere close.

yeah, and it's probably more likely to get an even illumination

Direct will be even.

But it also assures even distribution of spectrum, which will help tremendously as well.

Why am I up. Ugh.

You are welcome to try, but they aren't a terribly reliable method.

we have the detailed response curve data from cmosis if that helps

troy_s: Have to look at row noise but should hopefully be not that much of a problem

Fitting too.

jep. But it looked ugly on some of my last tests. Maybe it was just my FPN profile that went wrong.

What were you using? A chart?

Because those are the ones that are going to cause the most problems shooting anyways.

for FPN? Dark frames and a (not ideal, small) grey card. Will shoot a exposure braket of the exposure chart with 1/6th of a stop steps

Also, that wiki page isn't great advice.

I would do some exposure brakets anyways

I think that the matrix is likely darn close on the linear region. The only outliers will be in the non-linear, of which that higher light will probably be the most important. Possibly even consistent.

Would prefer not to have colored highlights too ;-)

What's going on with Apertus these days, how close are you to shipping hardware?

Early Beta hardware is finished, we are currently building the first devices

cool

good night