01:25 | anton__ | left the channel | |
03:26 | intracube | left the channel | |
03:52 | Bertl | off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
| |
03:52 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
| |
05:22 | wescotte | joined the channel | |
06:27 | Morethink | joined the channel | |
07:41 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
| |
07:42 | se6astian | good morning
| |
07:43 | alexML_ | hi
| |
07:43 | alexML_ | [#apertus] hey guys, another developer from ML is interested in Axiom: https://twitter.com/baldand http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=9560
| |
07:53 | se6astian | great!
| |
07:53 | se6astian | will get in touch with him a bit later today
| |
07:53 | se6astian | bbs
| |
07:53 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
| |
09:12 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
| |
09:13 | se6astian | back
| |
10:06 | philippej | joined the channel | |
10:49 | Morethink | left the channel | |
10:55 | Morethink | joined the channel | |
10:57 | Morethink | left the channel | |
10:59 | derWalter | joined the channel | |
11:00 | derWalter | hey everyone
| |
11:00 | philippej | hello !
| |
11:27 | derWalter | the axiom (movement?!) camera could become the blitzo of the film and photo business: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Fh9dYcUvTQ
| |
11:31 | Guest45124 | joined the channel | |
11:49 | se6astian | hello there Guest45124
| |
12:05 | derWalter | left the channel | |
12:06 | derWalter | joined the channel | |
12:06 | derWalter | left the channel | |
12:06 | derWalter | joined the channel | |
12:06 | derWalter | re ...
| |
12:29 | Bertl_zZ | morning folks!
| |
12:29 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
| |
12:44 | danieel | left the channel | |
12:54 | Thedr | joined the channel | |
12:55 | Thedr | left the channel | |
12:55 | Thedr_ | joined the channel | |
13:02 | derWalter | left the channel | |
13:03 | danieel | joined the channel | |
13:04 | Thedr_ | left the channel | |
13:33 | philippej | Unrelated but fun : http://wavepot.com/
| |
14:02 | philippej | left the channel | |
14:26 | danieel | left the channel | |
14:35 | eduardo | joined the channel | |
14:35 | eduardo | changed nick to: Guest70564
| |
14:40 | danieel | joined the channel | |
14:50 | Guest70564 | left the channel | |
15:24 | ThatCantBe | left the channel | |
15:26 | ThatCantBe | joined the channel | |
15:29 | derWalter | joined the channel | |
15:30 | Guest45124 | left the channel | |
16:07 | theuberkevlar | joined the channel | |
16:07 | theuberkevlar | anybody on right now?
| |
16:11 | se6astian | sure :)
| |
16:43 | Bertl | theuberkevlar: and even if not, if you have a question, just ask, it will get answered
| |
16:55 | wescotte | left the channel | |
17:14 | derWalter | http://howww.com/ would that something be which could help promoting the camera? did some one already talk to the piratebay? (promo bay) did some one talk to vimeo for instance already?
| |
17:18 | se6astian | not yet
| |
17:19 | se6astian | but what to propose exactly?
| |
17:22 | derWalter | to promote the crowdfunding
| |
17:24 | derWalter | i feel it stalled already, wanna get it going again, get more money into it than the 100k, and at least get to the 100k ofc :)
| |
17:24 | derWalter | reach out for the masses who would benefit the most from it
| |
17:25 | derWalter | its not (only) the producers, but the consuments!
| |
17:25 | philippej | joined the channel | |
17:25 | se6astian | we can try :)
| |
17:26 | derWalter | at vimeo, there are "staff picks", thats nothing too special, but would be seen by millions of vimeo users
| |
17:26 | derWalter | people who care for looks more than others
| |
17:26 | derWalter | promo bay would genereate an awefull lot of clicks
| |
17:26 | derWalter | directly reaching for the endusers of films
| |
17:28 | theuberkevlar | yeah
| |
17:29 | theuberkevlar | We should all contact Vimeo! It would be awesome if they would feature something. They seem like the kind of community that would love to endorse open source cinema (unless I am totally off).
| |
17:30 | derWalter | left the channel | |
17:32 | derWalter | joined the channel | |
17:32 | derWalter | re, somehow the connection got lost
| |
17:32 | se6astian | derWalter: check pm please :)
| |
17:32 | derWalter | yeah, i've read the first three lines
| |
17:33 | se6astian | 3 lines was all there was :)
| |
17:33 | se6astian | should I resend?
| |
17:34 | derWalter | before i lost the connection, i also asked for some press text i could send to the students at my university
| |
17:53 | philippej | se6astian, it might actually be a good idea to post the sample footage on vimeo
| |
17:54 | philippej | and ask for some promotion from them
| |
17:54 | philippej | we used youtube, but our target audience will likely be on vimeo
| |
17:54 | philippej | (partly)
| |
17:54 | philippej | it cost nothing to post on both I mean
| |
18:00 | se6astian | good idea
| |
18:00 | se6astian | do we have an apertus account on vimeo already
| |
18:01 | se6astian | I think we do
| |
18:01 | se6astian | but cant remember :)
| |
18:02 | intracube | joined the channel | |
18:11 | philippej | yes we have
| |
18:12 | derWalter | oh my gosh, those sunsets are sooo beautifull the last few days...
| |
18:12 | derWalter | i ll take a picture, brb
| |
18:12 | derWalter | :D
| |
18:14 | philippej | do yuo have an intermediate version of the footage I can upload?
| |
18:14 | philippej | not the 2.5gb one :-)
| |
18:15 | philippej | I have the 32mb mp4
| |
18:24 | derWalter | why not uploading the large one? on vimeo there is ftp uload, so if you have it somewhere online?
| |
18:24 | derWalter | mhhh, but i guess, they dont support fxp ://
| |
18:35 | alesage | left the channel | |
18:39 | alesage | joined the channel | |
18:39 | alesage | left the channel | |
18:39 | alesage | joined the channel | |
18:40 | baldand_ | joined the channel | |
18:40 | baldand_ | changed nick to: baldand
| |
18:42 | derWalter | i ve a question, which, maybe will sound stupid, but it is groundbreaking important to me and maybe many others: what is the highes goal of this project, why are you (the main and core devs) doing this? whats the answer, for which you would go over your own bad feelings, like working with people you would not want in your living room, but for achieving that one goal, you work together, cause working together will make the vision
| |
18:42 | anton-2 | joined the channel | |
18:45 | anton-2 | Hu, Btw in terms of footage it might be nice to see 15stop DR in action. Too bad that weather is unlikely to cooperate and deliver a day full of sunshine
| |
18:47 | derWalter | well, the moon can also be very interesting, especially with the right lens attached :)
| |
18:47 | anton-2 | That is if this wide dr is to be used as a headline feature to market the project
| |
18:47 | baldand | left the channel | |
18:48 | baldand | joined the channel | |
18:49 | anton-2 | left the channel | |
19:00 | se6astian | hi baldand!
| |
19:00 | se6astian | great to have you here
| |
19:04 | baldand | se6astian: hi!
| |
19:04 | se6astian | I am really bad at bash scripting but need a pretty simple one for someone who knows what he is doing :)
| |
19:06 | se6astian | "cat rawimage.raw16 | python CMV12000toDNG.py" pipes one image into the pythong converter
| |
19:06 | se6astian | the python converter will write img.dng
| |
19:06 | se6astian | I need a script that I can run to convert all raw16 files in a directory to DNGs with the same name as the raw16 file
| |
19:07 | Bertl | for n in *.raw16; do python CMV12000toDNG.py <"$n"; mv img.dng $n.dng; done
| |
19:07 | se6astian | perfect!
| |
19:07 | Bertl | you can even make it better with
| |
19:07 | Bertl | for n in *.raw16; do python CMV12000toDNG.py <"$n"; mv img.dng ${n%.raw16}.dng; done
| |
19:08 | Bertl | in bash, which will get rid of the .raw16
| |
19:08 | se6astian | thanks!
| |
19:08 | Bertl | and if you happen to have spaces in the name, use
| |
19:09 | Bertl | for n in *.raw16; do python CMV12000toDNG.py <"$n"; mv img.dng "${n%.raw16}.dng"; done
| |
19:09 | Bertl | and, you're welcome! :)
| |
19:09 | Juicyfruit | best would be to make the python script understand image sequences :)
| |
19:10 | se6astian | its not a real sequence, just a set of different images
| |
19:10 | se6astian | works, already converting :)
| |
19:10 | Juicyfruit | :)
| |
19:19 | baldand | If you are using python, you might be able to reuse some bits of MlRawViewer. E.g. it has a DNG.py module
| |
19:19 | baldand | ...which I use for reading and writing DNGs
| |
19:19 | baldand | (sorry if that's not relevant/helpful for this :-)
| |
19:22 | se6astian | might actually work yes
| |
19:22 | se6astian | will test soon
| |
19:22 | se6astian | currently snapping test images for alexML_ to measure
| |
19:22 | baldand | (https://bitbucket.org/baldand/mlrawviewer/src/HEAD/DNG.py)
| |
19:28 | derWalter | hey guys, i know my question is a quite serious ans maybe not so easy to answer, but i would be happy to get an answer sooner or later :))
| |
19:30 | philippe_ | joined the channel | |
19:30 | se6astian | derWalter: what was your question ?
| |
19:30 | se6astian | philippe_: pm
| |
19:30 | derWalter | i ve a question, which, maybe will sound stupid, but it is groundbreaking important to me and maybe many others: what is the highes goal of this project, why are you (the main and core devs) doing this? whats the answer, for which you would go over your own bad feelings, like working with people you would not want in your living room, but for achieving that one goal, you work together, cause working together will make the vision
| |
19:33 | se6astian | its actually very simple why I do it, and quite egoistic :) I would like to have powerful tools that I know to have full control over
| |
19:33 | se6astian | and that I can tune and tweak
| |
19:33 | kontrakatze | joined the channel | |
19:33 | philippe_ | derWalter, I think that reading this page : https://apertus.org/history might give some perspective
| |
19:34 | se6astian | I am a filmmaker myself so the tool is as important as the things you can make with it
| |
19:34 | philippe_ | this one also : https://apertus.org/about :-)
| |
19:34 | kontrakatze | Hello, I have a question regarding the ef-mount. You stated it would be passive, does it mean that even setting the aperature would have to be done manually?
| |
19:35 | philippe_ | kontrakatze, for now yes, but at some point we plan active lens control
| |
19:36 | philippe_ | and in a maybe more distant future, other craziness using the built in gyro (like reatime image stabilization)
| |
19:37 | kontrakatze | This would reduce the use of canon lenses a lot! "at some point" does mean not within the first or second batch if I follow the crowdfunding campain?
| |
19:37 | philippe_ | The roadmap is partially defined by people interest, skills, and any lobying done by knowledgeable people here
| |
19:38 | kontrakatze | goog answer, but not quite clear :-)
| |
19:39 | philippe_ | kontrakatze, we will try to give a more precise answer regarding this as soon as we can
| |
19:39 | philippe_ | for now, I would expect that the lens mounts will be passive at the time of inital release
| |
19:40 | philippe_ | but stay tuned :-)
| |
19:40 | kontrakatze | ok, I joined the campain anyway ... :-) But this would be a strong point for the filmmakers on a budget!
| |
19:40 | se6astian | agreed, we also want it, we just need to make sure we focus on the core of the camera first
| |
19:40 | se6astian | its definitely on the priority list
| |
19:41 | philippe_ | we don't want to promise more than we can achieve, it has already made people angry so many times with other companies / projects
| |
19:41 | derWalter | kontrakatze: pm
| |
19:42 | kontrakatze | I understand that very well, but it's good to hear its on the list.
| |
19:42 | philippej | left the channel | |
19:43 | jucar | left the channel | |
19:45 | jucar | joined the channel | |
19:45 | philippe_ | this lossless jpeg thing is very interesting
| |
19:45 | darthrake | left the channel | |
19:46 | derWalter | lossless jpg sounds like an oxymoron to me :D
| |
19:47 | baldand | There are quite many different lossless jpeg versions. You need to be specific which one you mean
| |
19:47 | baldand | The one DNG uses is from JPEG 1992, which always had a lossless version
| |
19:47 | baldand | (which is very different from the normal lossy version)
| |
19:48 | philippe_ | I'm just reading the wikipedia article
| |
19:48 | baldand | I just made a small decoder for the 1992 version. Planning to write an encoder next
| |
19:49 | philippe_ | when you say the one dng uses, is it official ?
| |
19:49 | baldand | I imagine you could do that compression on FPGA quite well
| |
19:49 | baldand | Yes
| |
19:49 | baldand | In the Adobe spec
| |
19:49 | philippe_ | and what ratio can you achieve?
| |
19:49 | baldand | It's about 50%
| |
19:50 | baldand | Depending on content of course
| |
19:50 | baldand | I think combining it with a linearization table is a good way to go
| |
19:50 | philippe_ | in the scope of magic lantern, you plan to use this to convert mlv to compressed dng ?
| |
19:50 | baldand | e.g. preserve the darker areas totally losslessly, and drop bits on the bright areas
| |
19:51 | baldand | Yes
| |
19:51 | baldand | Also I'd like to see MLV support it as a native compression format
| |
19:51 | baldand | For archiving MLV files
| |
19:51 | baldand | But that's up to e.g. g3gg0
| |
19:52 | philippe_ | you mean doing in camera compression ?
| |
19:52 | baldand | Blackmagic use it that way - lineariation + lossless JPEG
| |
19:52 | baldand | No I don't think so
| |
19:52 | baldand | ML can't do anything with the raw data in camera
| |
19:52 | baldand | There's no CPU for that
| |
19:52 | baldand | It can only dump to disk
| |
19:52 | baldand | But Apertus could do that
| |
19:52 | kontrakatze | left the channel | |
19:53 | philippe_ | huge achievement already, with non existent documentation :-)
| |
19:53 | baldand | (alexML_ correct me if I'm wrong... you're the expert here)
| |
19:53 | philippe_ | yes, this would be a nice addition
| |
19:54 | baldand | of course, if your data is 12bit it might not need the linearization
| |
19:54 | baldand | ML is 14bit, so there's some extra bits there
| |
19:56 | se6astian | lossless jpeg in DNG is limited to 8 bits AFAIR right?
| |
19:56 | baldand | No
| |
19:56 | baldand | Up to 16
| |
19:56 | baldand | 2-16
| |
19:56 | baldand | you can choose
| |
19:56 | philippe_ | we could at some point find a lossy compression scheme for raw data, because as told us convergent design's Mitch, people ask for 4k raw hfr, then they need broad shoulders to store and process it :-)
| |
19:56 | baldand | (quite foresighted of the JPEG in 1992 I think :-)
| |
19:57 | philippe_ | I already have a lot of sympathy for it, dating back from 92 :-)
| |
19:59 | philippe_ | have you seen this : http://opensource.mikrosimage.eu/duke.html
| |
19:59 | Bertl | lossless compression is always nice, but you still have to plan for uncompressed data
| |
20:02 | baldand | BTW just wanted to say that whatever formats you go with, I plan to try and support playing them with MlRawViewer
| |
20:02 | baldand | For what it's worth
| |
20:02 | Bertl | excellent!
| |
20:03 | se6astian | thats great!
| |
20:03 | darthrake | joined the channel | |
20:03 | philippe_ | it's great, because it means magic lantern users will be at home and have a proven pipeline
| |
20:04 | baldand | (I've recently being trying it with CDNGs from more cameras, so it is already not limited just to ML-originated data)
| |
20:04 | baldand | I'm not sure how useful that will be if you are using e.g. CDNG
| |
20:04 | derWalter | i see only baldand writing... must be a netsplit, brb
| |
20:04 | baldand | But it could help if you chosoe MLV
| |
20:04 | derWalter | left the channel | |
20:05 | philippe_ | one more proprietary codec that will vanish in 5 years : http://www.cinema5d.com/kinefinity-release-kineraw-compressed-raw-codec/
| |
20:05 | derWalter | joined the channel | |
20:12 | derWalter | changed nick to: derWalterAWAY
| |
20:12 | derWalterAWAY | changed nick to: derWalterzzZ
| |
20:12 | derWalterzzZ | changed nick to: derWalter
| |
20:15 | philippe_ | left the channel | |
20:18 | derWalter | wow@microsimage
| |
20:31 | se6astian | did you test it?
| |
20:31 | se6astian | sounds very interesting
| |
20:34 | baldand | Can I ask what the format of those .raw16 files are?
| |
20:35 | se6astian | https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php?title=RAW16
| |
20:37 | baldand | thanks!
| |
20:38 | baldand | I'll see if I can view those already in MlRawViewer
| |
20:39 | derWalter | just a kids question :) is lzma a topic via the fpga, or would it still be to slow?
| |
20:41 | Bertl | does it do about 2Gigabit per second?
| |
20:41 | Bertl | *Gigabyte
| |
20:41 | intracube | hello
| |
20:43 | intracube | quick question; will the Beta be able to downscale/interpolate the whole sensor down to standard definition (720x576)?
| |
20:43 | Bertl | yes
| |
20:43 | intracube | and is there any detailed info on the processing capability in this area
| |
20:43 | intracube | Bertl: kewl :)
| |
20:44 | Bertl | check out the Zynq 7020 reference
| |
20:44 | intracube | just thinking in case a client were to request SD only (it might happen, I guess)
| |
20:44 | intracube | Bertl: thanks, will do
| |
20:45 | Bertl | you're welcome!
| |
20:59 | derWalter | is it possible to define the area which gets downscaled? lets say i want only full/hd/sd, so i could use the crop factor to get a wider picture, if you understand? kinda like a software zoom... am i understandable?
| |
20:59 | philippej | joined the channel | |
21:00 | Bertl | should be doable, but arbitrary scaling can be tricky
| |
21:01 | derWalter | oops, i just know the media theoretic/philosophic meaning of arbitrary, i dont know what it means in technical context
| |
21:01 | Bertl | for example, cutting out an arbitrary region -> simple
| |
21:01 | Bertl | reducing that region by 1/2 or 2/3 or something like that -> easy
| |
21:02 | Bertl | scaling the region to NxM -> hard
| |
21:02 | derWalter | oh, you mean regarding aspect ratio?
| |
21:02 | derWalter | i didnt mean to change that
| |
21:03 | derWalter | i just meant to be able to say read 1920x1080 and put out 1280x720
| |
21:03 | Bertl | well, scaling 1090 pixel to 1080 while keeping the aspect might be problematic as well
| |
21:04 | Bertl | at least with proper interpolation, but it is still doable
| |
21:04 | derWalter | or read 1600x1000 put out 720p
| |
21:04 | derWalter | mhhhhhhh
| |
21:05 | Bertl | one problem will be that the FPGA space is limited
| |
21:06 | Bertl | so while a lot of things are doable, they might not all fit into the Beta FPGA
| |
21:06 | baldand | Yay, managed to load a raw16 into MlRawViewer
| |
21:07 | Bertl | there is .raw12 as well :)
| |
21:12 | baldand | Funny though, I had to use the alternate CFA pattern (GBRG) even the wiki said it is RGGB
| |
21:14 | Bertl | that can be, because the pattern depends on the sensor configuration
| |
21:14 | Bertl | i.e. flipped vs not-flipped
| |
21:15 | baldand | Looks like an SSD could just about manage real time playback for 12bit 24FPS
| |
21:15 | Bertl | to decide that, you would have to parse the sensor registers
| |
21:15 | Bertl | (if they are present and accurate at the end)
| |
21:16 | baldand | Do you have some sequences recorded yet?
| |
21:17 | Bertl | the Alpha I/O interface is too slow for sequences, we can only do time lapse
| |
21:17 | Bertl | (roughly 1:10 or so)
| |
21:20 | philippej | see you everyone !
| |
21:22 | derWalter | a good 3,5" harddisk will also bring around 150 mb/s, so a storage raid with at least 4 operating drives will also give the necessary troughput (which is more likely to be used ;)
| |
21:23 | baldand | SSD = 500MB/s
| |
21:23 | baldand | 1TB SSD = 500€
| |
21:23 | Bertl | yeah, we estimated at least two Sata 6G SSDs for proper recording
| |
21:23 | philippej | left the channel | |
21:24 | baldand | If you would do that lossless JPEG, you would only need one
| |
21:24 | derWalter | a, you are talking about record, sry
| |
21:24 | Bertl | baldand: under the condition that the data _can_ be compressed at least 1:2 :)
| |
21:24 | Bertl | (or 2:1 actually)
| |
21:24 | vroem | joined the channel | |
21:25 | Bertl | welcome vroem!
| |
21:25 | baldand | Of course it depends what frame rates you are trying to reach...
| |
21:25 | baldand | Are you thinking 50-60?
| |
21:26 | baldand | 12bit@24 only needs 450MB?
| |
21:26 | baldand | uncompressed
| |
21:27 | Bertl | ah, okay, so you're talking about uncompressed
| |
21:27 | derWalter | sata 3.2?
| |
21:27 | baldand | yes, jpeg should roughly halve that
| |
21:28 | baldand | umm... whatever samsung is selling these days
| |
21:28 | baldand | I have one in my laptop :-)
| |
21:28 | baldand | 500MB/s+ read and write
| |
21:30 | baldand | (was the only way to make working with raw usable on a laptop)
| |
21:35 | vroem | Thanks for the warm welcome Bertl :-)
| |
21:39 | Bertl | my pleasure!
| |
21:45 | baldand | I just added support for raw file sequences to MlRawViewer. See: https://bitbucket.org/baldand/mlrawviewer/commits/91ba48b9c041e1078f060b61c0cf259117d4ee7b
| |
21:45 | Bertl | great!
| |
21:45 | baldand | It can be used to load those raw16 file, either single ones or sequences. You just need to make a little info file to tell the size and cfa layout
| |
21:46 | baldand | See the commit message
| |
21:46 | baldand | With that you can export DNGs and ProRes MOVs
| |
21:46 | Bertl | excellent!
| |
21:46 | baldand | (one bug: CFA for the exported DNGs will be wrong if they are GBRG)
| |
21:46 | Bertl | would it work for the .raw12 as well?
| |
21:46 | baldand | It can be made to
| |
21:46 | baldand | Needs a little more work though.
| |
21:47 | baldand | I only see a couple of .raw12 files in the same dir as all the .raw16s Are those good to use?
| |
21:48 | baldand | What's the format of raw12?
| |
21:48 | Bertl | it is basically a packed version of the .raw16
| |
21:49 | baldand | what about endianness
| |
21:49 | baldand | of the packing
| |
21:49 | Bertl | should be big endian, IIRC
| |
21:49 | baldand | (there quite a few ways of doing these packings :-)
| |
21:50 | baldand | is it described somewhere?
| |
21:51 | baldand | well, I can take a look at it another day perhaps. For now it's only raw16
| |
21:51 | Bertl | no problem :)
| |
21:51 | baldand | (my IRC bick will stay on all the time even I'm offline, so you can leave me notes but I may not reply immediately)
| |
21:52 | Bertl | yeah, that's perfectly fine, same here when I'm off
| |
21:56 | vroem | left the channel | |
22:20 | se6astian | ok time for me to go to bed
| |
22:20 | se6astian | many thanks for all the new help today
| |
22:20 | se6astian | its a real pleasure to see things moving so well!
| |
22:21 | Bertl | good night!
| |
22:23 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
| |
22:27 | tth | left the channel | |
22:27 | tth | joined the channel | |
23:07 | theuberkevlar | I'll just keep tweeting away and editing footage in between while you guys are all snoozin'. :)
| |
23:16 | Bertl | sounds good :)
| |
23:23 | derWalter | Vimeo is the home for high-quality videos and the people who love them.Vimeo is the home for high-quality videos and the people who love them.
| |
23:34 | Bertl | sounds like a sales-pitch! sounds like a sales-pitch! :)
| |
23:37 | theuberkevlar | Why did you write it twice? Why did you write it twice?
| |
23:37 | Bertl | no idea, it just felt right ...
| |
23:44 | intracube | I had a go at grading the footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2RhmoKb36M
| |
23:46 | intracube | with less of a Log look
| |
00:24 | theuberkevlar | I was telling an aquaintance about the project and the campaign and how the camera is open source and this was his response: "But you can already hack your firmwear."
| |
00:24 | theuberkevlar | with that spelling
| |
00:29 | theuberkevlar | >:(
| |
00:30 | theuberkevlar | How do I respond to that? Misspeliing aside.
| |
00:33 | theuberkevlar | haha whoops
| |
00:33 | theuberkevlar | *Misspelling
| |
00:43 | aombk | i had a go at the footage too
| |
00:44 | aombk | http://aombk.attinom.net/axiomtest/1080p_1.mp4
| |
00:47 | aombk | you can reply, no you cant hack it. somebody else does the hacking for you but he may stop bothering now and he may use his skills to the development of beta
| |
00:48 | theuberkevlar | Haha!
| |
00:48 | theuberkevlar | Zing!
| |
00:51 | theuberkevlar | Exactly. What I ended up saying was: "Yeah, but it is so much more difficult when you have to fight through a proprietary system. And you void your warranty."
| |
00:51 | theuberkevlar | I think your idea was better, haha
| |
00:52 | intracube | and possibly brick your camera...
| |
00:52 | theuberkevlar | yup
| |
00:52 | intracube | aombk: nice. what software did you use to grade?
| |
00:52 | Bertl | it goes way beyond that, but many people do not realize
| |
00:52 | aombk | adobe premiere
| |
00:53 | theuberkevlar | Bertl, give me your points, how would you respond to that?
| |
00:53 | aombk | intracube, but i only use basic filters so it can be done to any program
| |
00:54 | Bertl | it starts with simple things, and it is similar to open source software, you find something you consider broken, or not optimal or you have a great idea what you could do if just ...
| |
00:55 | Bertl | but then the proprietary, closed part kicks in and keeps you from fixing this or that, trying out the new idea, etc ...
| |
00:55 | Bertl | now many folks say, yeah, _you_ can do that, by I cannot do that anyway
| |
00:56 | Bertl | and that might be right, but OTOH, everybody can hire somebody able to do that for him/her
| |
00:56 | Bertl | which usually isn't possible with proprietary applications or devices
| |
00:57 | Bertl | i.e. try to find somebody who modifies the windows kernel for you :)
| |
00:57 | aombk | btw theuberkevlar, you know that alex of magiclantern spends much of his time on beta already, right?
| |
00:59 | aombk | many people prefer to buy expensive cameras in the form of sealed black boxes and then pay thousands of money so that the corporation that sold them these black boxes will unlock its locked features
|