04:20 | Yash_Gupta | joined the channel | |
06:33 | Yash_Gupta | left the channel | |
07:24 | Bertl_oO | off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
| |
07:24 | Bertl_oO | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
| |
08:24 | sebix | joined the channel | |
08:24 | sebix | left the channel | |
08:24 | sebix | joined the channel | |
10:27 | comradekingu | joined the channel | |
11:01 | fredy | left the channel | |
12:14 | fredy__ | joined the channel | |
12:57 | sebix | left the channel | |
13:42 | RexOrCine | joined the channel | |
14:36 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
| |
15:09 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
| |
15:22 | sebastian_ | joined the channel | |
15:27 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
| |
15:27 | Bertl | morning folks!
| |
15:30 | se6ast1an | good day!
| |
15:33 | supraraj | joined the channel | |
15:33 | supraraj | Aloha
| |
15:57 | supraraj | left the channel | |
16:22 | futarisIRCcloud | left the channel | |
16:51 | fredy__ | left the channel | |
16:53 | fredy | joined the channel | |
16:59 | sraj | joined the channel | |
17:14 | sraj | left the channel | |
17:57 | sebastian_ | left the channel | |
18:03 | davidak | joined the channel | |
18:04 | davidak | oh no i'm too late
| |
18:05 | se6ast1an | no, we have just been cought in lots of internal discussion and now I need to go to the supermarket :)
| |
18:05 | se6ast1an | but we shall really start after my return
| |
18:06 | davidak | oh, ok
| |
18:19 | supraraj | joined the channel | |
18:19 | supraraj | left the channel | |
18:20 | davidak | i also have to get something to eat, but i have nothing to report, so it's fine to read when i'm back
| |
18:40 | davidak | i guickly got a vegan kebab :)
| |
19:11 | Bertl | how was the oxymoron? :)
| |
19:22 | se6ast1an | I return!
| |
19:23 | se6ast1an | so regarding the meeting: Bertl can you give an update on the AXIOM Remote?
| |
19:23 | davidak | Bertl, very delicious!
| |
19:23 | se6ast1an | current status quo and next steps
| |
19:32 | Bertl | sure, during GSoC Nira did some work and testing regarding button debouncing in software
| |
19:32 | Bertl | which can potentially reduce the amount of required components dramatically
| |
19:33 | Bertl | we currently use hardware debouncing which is basically an RC filter for each button/encoder input
| |
19:34 | se6ast1an | can you already give a recommendation regarding the 3 options: software, hardware or a mix of both decouncing methods?
| |
19:34 | se6ast1an | to be used in the next hardware revision?
| |
19:35 | Bertl | well, the 'mixed' version is not really a big win
| |
19:36 | Bertl | i.e. proper RC filter design does get rid of the bouncing in 99.9% of all cases
| |
19:36 | Bertl | for perfect debouncing, we would require special hardware
| |
19:36 | Bertl | (which is not an option)
| |
19:36 | Bertl | the software only approach looks quite promising but is currently missing proper implementation and integration
| |
19:37 | Bertl | based on the feedback I got from BAndiT1983, we probably should consider switching from I2C to UART
| |
19:37 | se6ast1an | will nira continue working on it now after gsoc?
| |
19:38 | Bertl | at least she promised to continue working on it, but haven't heard from her since GSoC ended
| |
19:38 | davidak | can you explain shortly what "button debouncing" is? is it to detect a button press only as one press and not multiple?
| |
19:39 | Bertl | se6ast1an: where was the wiki page from Nira?
| |
19:39 | Bertl | https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/Software_Button_Debouncing
| |
19:39 | Bertl | davidak: this should explain the problem and the proposed solution
| |
19:40 | davidak | thanks
| |
19:40 | Bertl | specificall this: https://github.com/niratubertc/GSoC/blob/master/Software_button_debouncing.pdf
| |
19:40 | se6ast1an | right, for me the thing is that the open questions I had regarding button choices, button illumination, rotary encoder choice and knob design are soon to be answered and I want to evaluate if we have any other open questions/challenges before we could do a V2 prototype hardware plus enclosure
| |
19:41 | Bertl | except for the interface decision and the question if we need an additional flash or want some kind of SD interface
| |
19:41 | davidak | Bertl, sadly it don't explain what it is
| |
19:41 | davidak | i just don't know the term "button debouncing"
| |
19:42 | Bertl | section 2.1, reference [5] is not clear enough?
| |
19:42 | se6ast1an | davidak: when you press any electric button it doesnt just switch from ON to OFF state or the other way around cleanly
| |
19:42 | se6ast1an | rather there are many "bounces" between these states
| |
19:43 | se6ast1an | debouncing prevents the effects of this behaviour
| |
19:43 | se6ast1an | flash or SD I would currently say no as we can store any additional data/presets/etc. on the connected camera
| |
19:44 | davidak | Bertl, that explains it. it's what i expected, good
| |
19:44 | se6ast1an | interface would still be usb-c as my prefered option, you wanted to investigate if we need to be able to switch pin out to account for flipping the connector, did you do that already?
| |
19:44 | Bertl | good, then I think we should switch to UART for the events
| |
19:45 | Bertl | haven't done that yet, but it shouldn't be a big deal
| |
19:45 | Bertl | worst case scenario is that we need an additional component to switch the pins
| |
19:46 | Bertl | (which should be rather cheap)
| |
19:46 | Bertl | but I will try to check till next week
| |
19:46 | se6ast1an | great, then we should collaborate on this in the coming weeks to box off the remaining changes/things
| |
19:47 | Bertl | sure
| |
19:48 | se6ast1an | any news on the USB3 development front?
| |
19:49 | Bertl | last time I checked, apurvanandan[m] was communicating with _florent_ with some 'difficulties'
| |
19:49 | Bertl | basic problems, as discussed before, are the reliability of the data stream
| |
19:50 | Bertl | i.e. it requires selected hardware (on the PC side) an unburdened bus infrastructure and a lot of CPU resources to run
| |
19:50 | se6ast1an | right, are there still steps left on the implementation side to actually load/stream image data from the beta?
| |
19:51 | Bertl | the integration with the axiom beta codebase is not complete yet
| |
19:51 | Bertl | but apurvanandan[m] promised to take care of that
| |
19:52 | Bertl | there is also some cooperation in the works to integrate it with Fares encoder
| |
19:54 | Bertl | I spent most of my free time in the last two weeks to get a test setup for astronomy applications (e.g. planet validator)
| |
19:54 | se6ast1an | great, apurvanandan[m] if you read this later please be so kind and give us an update and ETA if you can
| |
19:54 | Bertl | which among other things, included testing the direct sensor cooling
| |
19:55 | davidak | Bertl, have you some results in which temperatures the Beta can operate?
| |
19:56 | Bertl | we didn't do any specific temperate tests, but it was operated between 5 and 55 deg celsius without problems
| |
19:56 | davidak | i think there was a question for low temperatures
| |
19:56 | davidak | that's something. thanks
| |
19:57 | se6ast1an | and Bertl you mentioned you still need to evaluate the images right? did you record the sensor temperature externally?
| |
19:57 | Bertl | http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/AXIOM/BETA/axiom_beta_sensor_cooling.jpg
| |
19:58 | Bertl | this is the current setup for sensor cooling
| |
19:58 | Bertl | still without peltiers, but it manages to keep the sensor temperature around ambient plus 2-3 degrees
| |
19:59 | Bertl | se6ast1an: we didn't do any external temperature recordings but we have the internal sensor measurements which should be fairly accurate
| |
20:00 | Bertl | (just needs a two point calibration to interpret)
| |
20:00 | se6ast1an | right
| |
20:01 | Bertl | btw, here are the raw images from yesterdays session:
| |
20:01 | Bertl | http://files.apertus.org/KUFFNER/
| |
20:03 | se6ast1an | great, thanks
| |
20:03 | se6ast1an | quick update from the axiom beta compact CAD design front
| |
20:04 | se6ast1an | there is some interest from the freecad community to convert the designs to freecad: https://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema/beta-hardware/issues/6#issuecomment-529706895
| |
20:04 | se6ast1an | I have signed up there now and am curious to see how the collaboration turns out: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39387
| |
20:05 | se6ast1an | on the design front itself I have to solve the problem that due to adding a second optical filter holder into the optical light path the emount part needs to get a lot shorter
| |
20:05 | se6ast1an | the area where this becomes a problem is the unlock pin on the bayonet which needs a certain "depth" to operate
| |
20:06 | se6ast1an | not sure yet how exactly I will solve that
| |
20:06 | se6ast1an | ideas welcome
| |
20:06 | Bertl | wouldn't it be better to put the filter holders 'inside' the mount area (as suggested some time ago)?
| |
20:07 | se6ast1an | yeah I did consider that carefully but that would a) require quite an amount of additional space I do not have to offer currently and b) not solve the unlock pin issue directly
| |
20:08 | se6ast1an | a) could be solved by making the filter holders much smaller but that reduces our options for future larger sensors and or larger lens mounts
| |
20:09 | Bertl | good point
| |
20:11 | se6ast1an | thats it from the CAD front from me
| |
20:11 | se6ast1an | I am preparing to take a timelapse sequence with the remote beta in the darkbox
| |
20:11 | Bertl | great news about the freecadprogress
| |
20:11 | se6ast1an | have installed a wall clock in view already
| |
20:11 | Bertl | *freecad progress
| |
20:11 | se6ast1an | but currently battling with the firmware issues to capture a snapshot remotely in an automated way
| |
20:12 | Bertl | worked like a charm on the astronomy beta
| |
20:12 | se6ast1an | once that is solved I will also attempt to take some interleaved HDR sample snapshots with a pendulum for ugur
| |
20:12 | se6ast1an | which firmware version are you running on the astronomy beta currently?
| |
20:13 | Bertl | the 'original' one we use to ship with the Betas ATM
| |
20:14 | se6ast1an | yeah we know that works :)
| |
20:15 | se6ast1an | the goal is to get the new firmware to work reliably!
| |
20:16 | Bertl | ah, my bad, thought you want to take pictures
| |
20:16 | se6ast1an | :P
| |
20:17 | davidak | :D
| |
20:17 | se6ast1an | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbSehcT19u0
| |
20:18 | Bertl | LOL
| |
20:22 | davidak | se6ast1an, can you also update https://www.apertus.org/axiom-beta-status ?
| |
20:22 | davidak | i was asked how many axiom betas already exists, but i don't know
| |
20:22 | davidak | the map there implies 4
| |
20:23 | davidak | but i think there are more dev kits?
| |
20:23 | Bertl | yeah, at least five :)
| |
20:23 | davidak | :D
| |
20:23 | se6ast1an | did you click the map? :)
| |
20:23 | davidak | no
| |
20:24 | davidak | >This page can't load Google Maps correctly.
| |
20:24 | Bertl | it's all about clicking nowadays :)
| |
20:24 | davidak | it's not obvious
| |
20:25 | Bertl | good user interface design is a lost art ...
| |
20:25 | se6ast1an | feel free to suggest an alternative image
| |
20:25 | davidak | i count 15 on the map
| |
20:26 | davidak | it might be great if you keep track of how many you produce and publish the number
| |
20:26 | se6ast1an | not everyone agreed to and was added to the map
| |
20:26 | davidak | so people see you do something :D
| |
20:26 | se6ast1an | we have shipped slightly below 50 units so far
| |
20:27 | davidak | wow, that is more than 5
| |
20:27 | Bertl | yeah, about an order of magnitude :)
| |
20:28 | davidak | embed the map there instead of that image, so it's always up to date
| |
20:28 | Spirit532 | left the channel | |
20:28 | davidak | have the actual number under it as text
| |
20:28 | davidak | and use openstreetmap
| |
20:28 | Bertl | second that, RexOrCine will love to work on that
| |
20:29 | davidak | he can also post on social media when you made the 50th
| |
20:30 | RexOrCine | More inclined to design a map as was done with APOCs but I suspect it's more than 50 now.
| |
20:30 | Spirit532 | joined the channel | |
20:31 | davidak | RexOrCine, you can use OSM with different design, but it's more work
| |
20:32 | davidak | but then you have a reliable solution that you don't have to update manually
| |
20:32 | davidak | not sure if it's worth it
| |
20:33 | davidak | i think it's more important to have an up to date map
| |
20:33 | RexOrCine | True. I'm more familiar with just plain design and like the control, that why I'd be more inclined, but yes it does need periodic updates... which is ok I guess. Will have another look at this when I'm back in Vienna though.
| |
20:34 | davidak | thanks
| |
21:12 | namibj | se6ast1an: the filter holder handling I'd suggest would be to offer a way to skip the traditional threaded spacer area and instead stack the filters with a circlip-style holder you could mount the glass element in after extracting from the threaded ring. Twist of a polarization filter would need to be considered. I think focal-plane filters are generally annice and good idea, because some wide lenses
| |
21:12 | namibj | can't use front filters. Bonus if a filter wheel could mechanically fit without total lack of structural integrity for the emount-holder (bending the optical axis).
| |
21:15 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
| |
21:21 | Bertl | meeting seems to be over ... off for now ... bbl
| |
21:21 | namibj | Bertl: for cooling thst doesn't beed to go below 20~30°C, you might want to consider (flat?) heatpipes, possibly in form of a (possibly modified) laptop cooling setup with wide availability (bending/mounting heatpipes isn't trivial, and the laptop comes with a compact low-noise fan assembly).
| |
21:22 | Bertl | the current aluminum plates seem to do the job just fine, no heat pipes required for the sensor
| |
21:22 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_oO
| |
21:24 | namibj | Yeah, I'm more concerned with thermal resistance vs. weight.
| |
21:52 | se6ast1an | namibj: not sure I understand your optical filter idea but please take a look at the current design and create a hand drawing or anything so I can imagine your idea better?
| |
21:52 | se6ast1an | https://cad.onshape.com/documents/9aa42c10d73de66c7f7ef0a4/w/d1382fd006d56e4c3066c63f/e/81e10d4de555d5c93d129a74
| |
21:55 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
| |
21:57 | se6ast1an | off to bed
| |
21:57 | se6ast1an | good night
| |
22:07 | RexOrCine | left the channel | |
22:25 | davidak | left the channel | |
22:37 | namibj | se6ast1an: ok, it wasn't easy to operate the webview on the phone (I'm fighting the way to boot my PC install on spare hardware while repairs are pending), I could navigate to the point where I saw the filter holder plate. My idea would be to make them (optionally, to allow filters to be used with no risky handling) thinner, don't have it contact the glass directly anymore, but instead add a springy clip
| |
22:37 | namibj | (basically a ring that would nicely border the bare filter glass without the typical metal filter ring), which has a cut to be pushed open like a circlip to mount it to the glass. Then you'd have this metal-bordered glass circle (that combination is only fractions of a mm thicker than the glass) and the screw-holding spacer of same thickness, which fit sufficiently snugly as to not rattle. You might add a
| |
22:37 | namibj | spring where the cutout for the screw is currently in the filter holder to prevent rattling. This would require custom-thickness slabs for each (range of) filter glass thicknessnes, along with this ring-clip that holds the glass with small ridges over the rims of the glass faces. I think 0.1mm split in two 0.05mm thick ridges (measured along the optica axis) (one towards teh sensor, one towards the lens)
| |
22:37 | namibj | should be feasible if you can get the tolerances tight enough to cause these clop-rings to actually slightly compress against each other to brace the thin ridges against inertia forces from the filter glass when accelerating along the optical axis.
| |
22:37 | namibj | se6ast1an: if this still isn't clear, I'll find a way to illustrate it with drawings.
| |
22:52 | namibj | se6ast1an: the other consideration with a filter wheel seems mostly supported. it would require that the plates of the filter stack could be on the edge of a large plate of theet metal the right thickness, without getting blocked or interfering with any part of the camera. I'm not sure that sentence is easy to make sense of, so here a bit more pragmatic: look at how filter wheels for e.g. astronomy are
| |
22:52 | namibj | shaped/designed. It would be nice if one would only need to sacrifice two adjacent screws of the front assembly to replace the stack of filter plates with a future custom filter wheel. Thic mostly just needs protusion clearance on one half of the front face of the main body. "half" does not mean leflt, right, top or bottom specifically. It would be fine if it would mean "diagonally, upper left corner" or
| |
22:52 | namibj | some other "weird" angle of this dividing line. This is nothing you should compromise any feature you aren't (close to) indiffernt about the location on the front face. It could allow such things as quicly swapping an ND-filter when transitioning a steadycam from inside to outside or the other way around, and that's before one thinks about colors.
| |
22:52 | namibj | That'd be it for now, however.
| |
23:40 | Spirit532 | left the channel | |
23:40 | Spirit532 | joined the channel | |
00:04 | futarisIRCcloud | joined the channel |