Current Server Time: 23:23 (Central Europe)

#apertus IRC Channel Logs

2018/08/15

Timezone: UTC

1
01:00
niemand
left the channel
2
01:26
TheMesquito18
joined the channel
3
01:30
TheMesquito18
left the channel
4
01:51
threeFifths
joined the channel
5
01:56
threeFifths
left the channel
6
03:53
jucar
joined the channel
7
04:01
GDiaX
joined the channel
8
04:02
GDiaX
left the channel
9
05:37
Awesomecase12
joined the channel
10
05:38
Awesomecase12
left the channel
11
06:08
UncleSamuel16
joined the channel
12
06:13
UncleSamuel16
left the channel
13
06:40
jucar
left the channel
14
06:55
RexOrCine
changed nick to: RexOrCine|away
15
07:11
Georgyo12
joined the channel
16
07:16
Georgyo12
left the channel
17
08:12
orliesaurus4
joined the channel
18
08:13
orliesaurus4
left the channel
19
08:13
sins-
joined the channel
20
08:15
sins-
left the channel
21
08:23
RexOrCine|away
changed nick to: RexOrCine
22
08:40
se6astian|away
changed nick to: se6astian
23
08:47
wodencafe18
joined the channel
24
08:51
wodencafe18
left the channel
25
09:07
niemand
joined the channel
26
09:07
niemand
left the channel
27
09:07
niemand
joined the channel
28
09:43
Shibe27
joined the channel
29
09:45
Shibe27
left the channel
30
10:16
Guest27507_
joined the channel
31
10:18
Guest27507
left the channel
32
10:18
Guest27507_
changed nick to: Guest27507
33
10:34
ultrabong8
joined the channel
34
10:35
ultrabong8
left the channel
35
10:52
g3gg0
joined the channel
36
10:55
FireFly14
joined the channel
37
10:56
RexOrCine
Greetings.
38
10:57
FireFly14
left the channel
39
11:00
comradekingu
joined the channel
40
11:03
dungodung28
joined the channel
41
11:04
dungodung28
left the channel
42
11:34
se6astian
changed nick to: se6astian|away
43
12:08
illwieckz
joined the channel
44
12:17
mauz555
joined the channel
45
12:20
danieeel
joined the channel
46
12:23
danieel
left the channel
47
12:32
mauz555
left the channel
48
12:34
mauz555
joined the channel
49
12:37
danieeel
changed nick to: danieel
50
12:40
danieeel
joined the channel
51
12:42
danieeel
left the channel
52
12:42
danieeel
joined the channel
53
12:43
Guest24727
joined the channel
54
12:43
Guest24727
left the channel
55
12:43
danieel
left the channel
56
12:44
danieeel
left the channel
57
12:44
danieel
joined the channel
58
12:56
mauz555
left the channel
59
12:58
mauz555
joined the channel
60
13:04
mauz555
left the channel
61
13:21
mauz555
joined the channel
62
13:33
mauz555
left the channel
63
13:40
mauz555
joined the channel
64
13:40
varesa27
joined the channel
65
13:41
varesa27
left the channel
66
13:48
mauz555
left the channel
67
13:53
mauz555
joined the channel
68
14:14
mauz555
left the channel
69
14:25
mauz555
joined the channel
70
15:13
niemand
left the channel
71
15:24
jucar
joined the channel
72
15:28
niemand
joined the channel
73
15:28
niemand
left the channel
74
15:28
niemand
joined the channel
75
15:31
mauz555
left the channel
76
15:55
BAndiT1983|away
changed nick to: BAndiT1983
77
16:01
anuejn[m]
BAndiT1983 se6astian Bertl: are you ok with splitting the beta software repo?
78
16:01
anuejn[m]
ie. putting gateware control daemon,. .. in their own repos
79
16:02
anuejn[m]
then have git submodules and rename the current beta software to axiom-firmware?
80
16:03
anuejn[m]
i think we are at a point, where that makes sense
81
16:07
BAndiT1983
can we build them separately and also together in beta software through CI?
82
16:42
Mony2
joined the channel
83
16:47
Mony2
left the channel
84
17:05
niemand
left the channel
85
17:08
niemand
joined the channel
86
17:08
niemand
left the channel
87
17:08
niemand
joined the channel
88
17:20
jucar
left the channel
89
19:48
jhesketh22
joined the channel
90
19:52
jhesketh22
left the channel
91
20:05
illwieckz
left the channel
92
20:18
illwieckz
joined the channel
93
20:20
se6astian|away
changed nick to: se6astian
94
20:23
se6astian
anuejn: is it time because of filesize/complexity you think?
95
20:24
se6astian
I am fine with whatever makes most sense
96
20:24
kepler_mach8
joined the channel
97
20:24
danielhuman
joined the channel
98
20:26
kepler_mach8
left the channel
99
20:31
danielhuman
left the channel
100
21:10
anuejn[m]
BAndiT1983: Both should be doable
101
21:10
anuejn[m]
and i think, that both is helpfull
102
21:11
anuejn[m]
se6astian: imo because the repo contains different projects with different developers/development cycles
103
21:12
anuejn[m]
ie. to develop the gateware and the daemon, one needs completely different backgrounds, tools, interests...
104
21:13
anuejn[m]
splitting them would make it easier to develop parts seperately and make it more clear, that they are mostly indeendent projects
105
21:15
g3gg0
changed nick to: g3gg0|afk
106
21:19
BAndiT1983
anuejn[m]: what would be the procedure to split the stuff? can we do it step by step to prevent bigger failures at once?
107
21:22
anuejn[m]
yup seems fine for me
108
21:22
anuejn[m]
i would suggest to first rename the repo
109
21:22
anuejn[m]
then split out the gateware, then the daemon and then everything else
110
21:25
danieel
left the channel
111
21:25
danieel
joined the channel
112
21:26
BAndiT1983
113
21:26
danieel
we had similar issues here, my colleague insisted on keeping the hdl + kernel driver in same repo.. its nonsense
114
21:27
danieel
better to have them separate, then the driver shall check the version or rather a feature bitmask
115
21:28
danieel
even that both sides need cooperation, they are developed in quite different ways and pace
116
21:32
BAndiT1983
how can we ensure compatibility between related modules?
117
21:39
danieel
you can create a release repo with submodules that point to an exact compatible pair?
118
21:43
BAndiT1983
do they point to binaries or certain commits? we need a bit more clear plan, as it's a bigger decision to split, because also people that are not that deep into version control have to deal with possible problems
119
21:43
BAndiT1983
off for today, but will check the logs tomorrow
120
21:43
BAndiT1983
changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
121
21:44
niemand
left the channel
122
21:54
anuejn[m]
i agree to danieel , that pointing to specific commits of repos is a possible way
123
21:55
anuejn[m]
however, i think, that this is currently not a very big concern, because the daemon is not yet usabe and therefore we dont have a version to pin
124
21:56
anuejn[m]
the development of the gateware is currently to slow to be worth pinning
125
21:56
anuejn[m]
(only my opinion=
126
21:56
anuejn[m]
*)
127
22:05
se6astian
changed nick to: se6astian|away
128
22:10
SuchWow19
joined the channel
129
22:12
SuchWow19
left the channel