Current Server Time: 17:45 (Central Europe)

#apertus IRC Channel Logs

2018/08/15

Timezone: UTC

1
00:00
niemand
left the channel
2
00:26
TheMesquito18
joined the channel
3
00:30
TheMesquito18
left the channel
4
00:51
threeFifths
joined the channel
5
00:56
threeFifths
left the channel
6
02:53
jucar
joined the channel
7
03:01
GDiaX
joined the channel
8
03:02
GDiaX
left the channel
9
04:37
Awesomecase12
joined the channel
10
04:38
Awesomecase12
left the channel
11
05:08
UncleSamuel16
joined the channel
12
05:13
UncleSamuel16
left the channel
13
05:40
jucar
left the channel
14
05:55
RexOrCine
changed nick to: RexOrCine|away
15
06:11
Georgyo12
joined the channel
16
06:16
Georgyo12
left the channel
17
07:12
orliesaurus4
joined the channel
18
07:13
orliesaurus4
left the channel
19
07:13
sins-
joined the channel
20
07:15
sins-
left the channel
21
07:23
RexOrCine|away
changed nick to: RexOrCine
22
07:40
se6astian|away
changed nick to: se6astian
23
07:47
wodencafe18
joined the channel
24
07:51
wodencafe18
left the channel
25
08:07
niemand
joined the channel
26
08:07
niemand
left the channel
27
08:07
niemand
joined the channel
28
08:43
Shibe27
joined the channel
29
08:45
Shibe27
left the channel
30
09:16
Guest27507_
joined the channel
31
09:18
Guest27507
left the channel
32
09:18
Guest27507_
changed nick to: Guest27507
33
09:34
ultrabong8
joined the channel
34
09:35
ultrabong8
left the channel
35
09:52
g3gg0
joined the channel
36
09:55
FireFly14
joined the channel
37
09:56
RexOrCine
Greetings.
38
09:57
FireFly14
left the channel
39
10:00
comradekingu
joined the channel
40
10:03
dungodung28
joined the channel
41
10:04
dungodung28
left the channel
42
10:34
se6astian
changed nick to: se6astian|away
43
11:08
illwieckz
joined the channel
44
11:17
mauz555
joined the channel
45
11:20
danieeel
joined the channel
46
11:23
danieel
left the channel
47
11:32
mauz555
left the channel
48
11:34
mauz555
joined the channel
49
11:37
danieeel
changed nick to: danieel
50
11:40
danieeel
joined the channel
51
11:42
danieeel
left the channel
52
11:42
danieeel
joined the channel
53
11:43
Guest24727
joined the channel
54
11:43
Guest24727
left the channel
55
11:43
danieel
left the channel
56
11:44
danieeel
left the channel
57
11:44
danieel
joined the channel
58
11:56
mauz555
left the channel
59
11:58
mauz555
joined the channel
60
12:04
mauz555
left the channel
61
12:21
mauz555
joined the channel
62
12:33
mauz555
left the channel
63
12:40
mauz555
joined the channel
64
12:40
varesa27
joined the channel
65
12:41
varesa27
left the channel
66
12:48
mauz555
left the channel
67
12:53
mauz555
joined the channel
68
13:14
mauz555
left the channel
69
13:25
mauz555
joined the channel
70
14:13
niemand
left the channel
71
14:24
jucar
joined the channel
72
14:28
niemand
joined the channel
73
14:28
niemand
left the channel
74
14:28
niemand
joined the channel
75
14:31
mauz555
left the channel
76
14:55
BAndiT1983|away
changed nick to: BAndiT1983
77
15:01
anuejn[m]
BAndiT1983 se6astian Bertl: are you ok with splitting the beta software repo?
78
15:01
anuejn[m]
ie. putting gateware control daemon,. .. in their own repos
79
15:02
anuejn[m]
then have git submodules and rename the current beta software to axiom-firmware?
80
15:03
anuejn[m]
i think we are at a point, where that makes sense
81
15:07
BAndiT1983
can we build them separately and also together in beta software through CI?
82
15:42
Mony2
joined the channel
83
15:47
Mony2
left the channel
84
16:05
niemand
left the channel
85
16:08
niemand
joined the channel
86
16:08
niemand
left the channel
87
16:08
niemand
joined the channel
88
16:20
jucar
left the channel
89
18:48
jhesketh22
joined the channel
90
18:52
jhesketh22
left the channel
91
19:05
illwieckz
left the channel
92
19:18
illwieckz
joined the channel
93
19:20
se6astian|away
changed nick to: se6astian
94
19:23
se6astian
anuejn: is it time because of filesize/complexity you think?
95
19:24
se6astian
I am fine with whatever makes most sense
96
19:24
kepler_mach8
joined the channel
97
19:24
danielhuman
joined the channel
98
19:26
kepler_mach8
left the channel
99
19:31
danielhuman
left the channel
100
20:10
anuejn[m]
BAndiT1983: Both should be doable
101
20:10
anuejn[m]
and i think, that both is helpfull
102
20:11
anuejn[m]
se6astian: imo because the repo contains different projects with different developers/development cycles
103
20:12
anuejn[m]
ie. to develop the gateware and the daemon, one needs completely different backgrounds, tools, interests...
104
20:13
anuejn[m]
splitting them would make it easier to develop parts seperately and make it more clear, that they are mostly indeendent projects
105
20:15
g3gg0
changed nick to: g3gg0|afk
106
20:19
BAndiT1983
anuejn[m]: what would be the procedure to split the stuff? can we do it step by step to prevent bigger failures at once?
107
20:22
anuejn[m]
yup seems fine for me
108
20:22
anuejn[m]
i would suggest to first rename the repo
109
20:22
anuejn[m]
then split out the gateware, then the daemon and then everything else
110
20:25
danieel
left the channel
111
20:25
danieel
joined the channel
112
20:26
BAndiT1983
113
20:26
danieel
we had similar issues here, my colleague insisted on keeping the hdl + kernel driver in same repo.. its nonsense
114
20:27
danieel
better to have them separate, then the driver shall check the version or rather a feature bitmask
115
20:28
danieel
even that both sides need cooperation, they are developed in quite different ways and pace
116
20:32
BAndiT1983
how can we ensure compatibility between related modules?
117
20:39
danieel
you can create a release repo with submodules that point to an exact compatible pair?
118
20:43
BAndiT1983
do they point to binaries or certain commits? we need a bit more clear plan, as it's a bigger decision to split, because also people that are not that deep into version control have to deal with possible problems
119
20:43
BAndiT1983
off for today, but will check the logs tomorrow
120
20:43
BAndiT1983
changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
121
20:44
niemand
left the channel
122
20:54
anuejn[m]
i agree to danieel , that pointing to specific commits of repos is a possible way
123
20:55
anuejn[m]
however, i think, that this is currently not a very big concern, because the daemon is not yet usabe and therefore we dont have a version to pin
124
20:56
anuejn[m]
the development of the gateware is currently to slow to be worth pinning
125
20:56
anuejn[m]
(only my opinion=
126
20:56
anuejn[m]
*)
127
21:05
se6astian
changed nick to: se6astian|away
128
21:10
SuchWow19
joined the channel
129
21:12
SuchWow19
left the channel