00:55 | illwieckz | left the channel | |
00:56 | illwieckz | joined the channel | |
00:57 | comradekingu | left the channel | |
01:11 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
| |
06:16 | Bertl_oO | off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
| |
06:16 | Bertl_oO | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
| |
06:53 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
| |
08:15 | miek | left the channel | |
08:16 | metal_dent[m] | left the channel | |
08:16 | metal_dent[m] | joined the channel | |
08:19 | miek | joined the channel | |
09:34 | comradekingu | joined the channel | |
09:56 | miek | left the channel | |
10:11 | miek | joined the channel | |
10:31 | miek | left the channel | |
10:42 | aombk | left the channel | |
10:43 | aombk | joined the channel | |
11:39 | aombk | left the channel | |
11:40 | aombk | joined the channel | |
11:59 | aombk | left the channel | |
11:59 | aombk | joined the channel | |
12:03 | se6ast1an | all google services seem to be down, can anyone confirm?
| |
12:06 | BAndiT1983 | yes
| |
12:07 | BAndiT1983 | someone probably misconfigured the load balancer
| |
12:07 | se6ast1an | or pulled out the single ethernet cable that had the "do not unplug" sticky note on it...
| |
12:07 | BAndiT1983 | just google search works, but mail and youtube are down for a couple of minutes
| |
12:08 | BAndiT1983 | this is a very bad label, as people won't react properly, it must say: "this is the internet, do not unplug!"
| |
12:09 | BAndiT1983 | https://stadt-bremerhaven.de/google-mit-stoerung-gmail-youtube-und-weitere/
| |
12:12 | comradekingu | left the channel | |
12:13 | se6ast1an | "worldwide", impressive :)
| |
12:14 | comradekingu | joined the channel | |
12:16 | futarisIRCcloud | joined the channel | |
12:35 | BAndiT1983 | looks like YT is back online
| |
12:36 | se6ast1an | true, drive as well
| |
12:36 | se6ast1an | and gmail
| |
12:52 | EmilJ | hi there
| |
12:52 | EmilJ | anuejn, were you talking about digesting stills?
| |
12:52 | EmilJ | or captured video?
| |
12:56 | aombk | left the channel | |
12:56 | aombk | joined the channel | |
13:02 | miek | joined the channel | |
13:05 | aombk | left the channel | |
13:06 | aombk | joined the channel | |
13:14 | anuejn | EmilJ: when?
| |
13:14 | anuejn | hi btw
| |
13:14 | anuejn | most of the time I talk about video :)
| |
13:14 | EmilJ | > seems like it is somewhat faster (~60fps with the beta 4k images on my laptop)
| |
13:15 | anuejn | ah
| |
13:15 | EmilJ | I guess it wouldn't make sense to h264 stills
| |
13:15 | anuejn | yup that is for video
| |
13:15 | EmilJ | is the main video readout method still HDMI capture as the wiki says?
| |
13:15 | anuejn | but other than the h264 in the end (which is not done by me) there isnt really any inter frame processing going on
| |
13:16 | anuejn | so it could as well be stills
| |
13:16 | anuejn | Currently yes but I am working on making the usb3 plugin work
| |
13:16 | anuejn | so that is the way I am experimenting with
| |
13:18 | EmilJ | With the camera as device or host?
| |
13:19 | anuejn | the camera as device
| |
13:19 | anuejn | streaming live video to a connected notebook
| |
13:19 | anuejn | which then runs said software
| |
13:21 | EmilJ | Would be nice if we could replace the notebook with a board with a bit spicier processor than the two cores on the zynq, recording to M.2 or something
| |
13:22 | EmilJ | after real-time h265 encoding, I mean
| |
13:22 | anuejn | that is more or less the plan
| |
13:23 | anuejn | Bertl_zZ: is working on a solution with an ultrascale zynq
| |
13:23 | EmilJ | oh awesome
| |
13:23 | anuejn | but we also considered multiple other platforms
| |
13:23 | EmilJ | I'd love to read through the notes or chat logs for that
| |
13:23 | anuejn | the stuff I am working on is currently more leaning towards using an intel based board
| |
13:24 | anuejn | (because that closely matches my notebooks hardware)
| |
13:24 | anuejn | hm... let me dig that out
| |
13:24 | vup | (or amd apu based boards should work aswell)
| |
13:25 | aombk | left the channel | |
13:25 | EmilJ | it seems like new bunch-of-ARM-cores SoCs could be a neat, power and price-efficient solution
| |
13:25 | EmilJ | NXP has some wild SoCs and I think they're expensive (20USD per part) but I mean, we're comparing stuff to Ultrascale here
| |
13:25 | aombk | joined the channel | |
13:28 | anuejn | hm... sadly I cant find the relevant meetings
| |
13:28 | anuejn | maybe Bertl_zZ knows
| |
13:28 | vup | well we currently use the hardware accelerated h264 encoding, I think any solution not having that won't be competitive, atleast power wise
| |
13:28 | anuejn | Yup other arm socs might be an option too
| |
13:29 | anuejn | yup
| |
13:29 | anuejn | I cant even closely encode h264 in software on my notebook
| |
13:29 | vup | well maybe I am about to change that :P
| |
13:29 | anuejn | but I guess se6ast1an is not into h264 at all
| |
13:29 | anuejn | vup: :)
| |
13:30 | EmilJ | do you have a power consumption estimate of accelerated X unaccelerated encode?
| |
13:31 | anuejn | EmilJ: I do not own a computer fast enough to do unaccelerated encoding in realtime
| |
13:31 | anuejn | so I would say above 15W (which is the power budget of my cpu) for unaccelerated encode
| |
13:32 | vup | just as a point of reference: encoding 1080p30 video takes about < 0.8W on my laptop
| |
13:32 | anuejn | (accellerated?!)
| |
13:33 | EmilJ | Hmm, yeah... I undershot
| |
13:33 | vup | yes hardware encoding
| |
13:34 | anuejn | but probably h264 is not the compression we end up using for most applications
| |
13:34 | anuejn | I have the impression that most people want a format that is more raw
| |
13:34 | vup | yeah
| |
13:35 | anuejn | but I think we will find something there
| |
13:36 | anuejn | (if you are interested, I found https://gopro.github.io/cineform-sdk/ to be a good introductory read on wavelet image compression)
| |
13:37 | anuejn | something like that seems like a good fit to implement in an fpga (if memory bandwidth permits) which might be a bit tough
| |
13:40 | EmilJ | oh yeah, benched my ryzen 3600, was able to do 40FPS transcoding h264 to h265 (source and destination both 1080p30)
| |
13:40 | EmilJ | Handbrake, nvenc off
| |
13:41 | anuejn | Yeah I guess h265 is a bit more demanding hardware wise
| |
13:41 | aombk | left the channel | |
13:42 | aombk | joined the channel | |
13:46 | EmilJ | so, the current plan is embedded AMD64 from Intel?
| |
13:46 | EmilJ | the NXP SoCs are too sucky to encode 4k
| |
13:48 | anuejn | the current plan is not really finalized ;)
| |
13:49 | anuejn | we might go with an fpga
| |
13:49 | anuejn | but the short term solution is probably bring your own notebook :)
| |
13:49 | EmilJ | With a hard encoder core?
| |
13:51 | EmilJ | By the way, teradek bolt is an impressive product series. "Zero latency" video transmission at 5GHz. They're using proprietary encoding
| |
13:53 | EmilJ | https://irc.tywoniak.eu/file/1/26zZSKkRBZuavwNx
| |
14:06 | anuejn | yup
| |
14:06 | anuejn | gererally i find wireless video very fascinating
| |
14:40 | aombk | left the channel | |
14:41 | aombk | joined the channel | |
14:46 | futarisIRCcloud | left the channel | |
15:03 | aombk | left the channel | |
15:04 | aombk | joined the channel | |
15:39 | aombk | left the channel | |
15:39 | aombk | joined the channel | |
16:06 | aombk | left the channel | |
16:07 | aombk | joined the channel | |
16:14 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
| |
16:14 | Bertl | morning folks!
| |
16:17 | se6ast1an | good day
| |
16:20 | aombk | left the channel | |
16:21 | aombk | joined the channel | |
16:56 | se6ast1an | meeting in 5 minutes!
| |
17:00 | se6ast1an | MEETING TIME!
| |
17:00 | se6ast1an | who is here?
| 17:00 | Bertl | is here ...
| 17:00 | vup | is here
|
17:01 | se6ast1an | BAndiT1983: messaged me he will be occupied now unfortunately but has nothing new worth reporting
| |
17:02 | se6ast1an | vup: do you have news for us?
| |
17:02 | vup | a bit and I will also share some news from anuejn
| |
17:02 | vup | shall I start?
| |
17:03 | se6ast1an | please!
| |
17:04 | vup | ok, so first some news from anuejn, he continued working on getting a usb3 stream from the micro to the recorder working
| |
17:05 | vup | the recorder can now successfully receive data sent from the zynq to the usb3 plugin module, however there are still some problems
| |
17:05 | vup | first the frame alignment is not implemented yet
| |
17:06 | vup | and furthermore sometimes it seems like data gets lost
| |
17:06 | se6ast1an | frame alignment means to know when data from one image stops and the next starts?
| |
17:06 | vup | yes
| |
17:06 | se6ast1an | understood
| |
17:06 | vup | to do that efficient is a bit tricky, because we want to avoid copying the data around
| |
17:07 | vup | so we essentially want to figure out where the frame starts
| |
17:07 | Bertl | didn't we agree to reserve some codes for this purpose?
| |
17:07 | vup | yes
| |
17:07 | vup | that part is not hard
| |
17:07 | vup | the not copying part is a bit tricky (but also not too bad)
| |
17:08 | vup | The idea is, after figuring out where the frame starts, to read a smaller (than one frame) buffer from the usb3, such that when reading the next frame the buffer is aligned to the start of the frame
| |
17:09 | Bertl | hmm, okay, so 'who/what' would be copying?
| |
17:09 | vup | this is complicated by the fact, that one cannot read buffers smaller than 2048 * 4 bytes from the ft601, so some final adjustment has to be done after that. (Also frames + padding always have to be a multiple of 2048 * 4 bytes)
| |
17:10 | vup | Bertl: well you could just read a framesized buffer, figure out the start and then copy the starting part of the frame into a new buffer. On the next transfer you then get the rest of that frame and also a start of the new frame
| |
17:11 | vup | well anyways, its not really hard, but anuejn did not get to implementing the alignmenTyet
| |
17:11 | vup | we also found a problem where sometimes some data gets lost (probably by one of the fifos either on the zynq or the machxo2 overflowing)
| |
17:12 | vup | so we need to figure out how to handle that best
| |
17:12 | Bertl | okay, probably first step to figure out what's overflowing and why
| |
17:12 | vup | either by reading more quickly on the computer side, or maybe adding backpressure from the machxo2 to the zynq
| |
17:12 | vup | Bertl: well it is most certainly the fifo on the machxo2
| |
17:13 | vup | moving some work (mostly allocating new buffers) done on the computer from the thread that does the receiving to another thread eliminated most of the lost data
| |
17:13 | vup | *eliminated most of the loosing of data
| |
17:14 | Bertl | do we have resources for a second fifo or can we make the fifo larger?
| |
17:14 | vup | The fifo on the machxo2 is essentially at the maximum size
| |
17:14 | vup | maybe a few more words can be squeezed in by using a dram fifo
| |
17:14 | vup | but we already use most of the lut's on the machxo2 (and of course the bram for the fifo)
| |
17:16 | vup | Ok, so I also played around a bit with the recorder this week and I started to implement a way to do zerocopy video encoding
| |
17:16 | vup | (and zerocopy sharing of the data with other gpu based frameworks like CUDA should be possible aswell)
| |
17:18 | vup | We currently do the debayering in the recorder with vulkan, and using a extension we can export a vulkan buffer as something called dma-buf. This is a linux framework to share GPU memory between processes and even access GPU memory from the CPU (CPU access will most certainly be very slow when using a dGPU, but using a iGPU its very fast)
| |
17:18 | vup | By passing the debayered data as a dma-buf from vulkan to vaapi (which can export dma-bufs) it should be possible to use the hardware encoding without needing to copy the data once
| |
17:19 | vup | In our previous tests, copying the data took more than 70% of the time needed in the encoding process, so that should help quite a lot with the speed there
| |
17:19 | se6ast1an | very cool!
| |
17:21 | vup | so yeah, now I am working on getting the encoding part working and landing the mesa patch necessary to get writable access to the dma-buf from the CPU
| |
17:21 | vup | thats it from we for this week I think
| |
17:21 | se6ast1an | great progress
| |
17:21 | se6ast1an | do you want to talk about the Micro R3 / R2.1 as well or should I cover that?
| |
17:21 | Bertl | vup: sounds nice!
| |
17:21 | vup | you can cover that :)
| |
17:22 | se6ast1an | right :)
| |
17:22 | se6ast1an | many thanks for the report, very exciting!
| |
17:23 | se6ast1an | ok brief updates from me then:
| |
17:23 | se6ast1an | Max finished editing of Team Talk 15.5 and I am currently writing an article draft around it
| |
17:23 | se6ast1an | for review and release in a few days I would assume
| |
17:25 | se6ast1an | Will work on reviving the automated pick and place machine at the factoryhub together with daniel tomorrow
| |
17:25 | se6ast1an | and on thursday we will visit another electronics manufacturing facility with very low cost machines
| |
17:25 | se6ast1an | appointment was actually planned for today but got delayed
| |
17:26 | se6ast1an | we still plan to have Tele produce the AXIOM Beta hardware though
| |
17:26 | se6ast1an | just more options = good :)
| |
17:27 | se6ast1an | There were several meeting over the course of the last week regarding the AXIOM Micro
| |
17:27 | se6ast1an | vup and anuejn are working on the Release 3 currently
| |
17:27 | Bertl | yay!
| |
17:27 | se6ast1an | but this is still a bigger project with several ground decisions to be made
| |
17:28 | se6ast1an | like full featured vs low complexity
| |
17:28 | se6ast1an | anuejn and vup estimated it will likely take them another year to complete
| |
17:28 | se6ast1an | at least
| |
17:29 | se6ast1an | but a more immediate result could be fixing the discovered issues and problems with the R2
| |
17:29 | se6ast1an | to arrive at something called R2.1 currently
| |
17:29 | se6ast1an | including bug fixes, but also cleaning up and removing stuff that turned out to be less useful
| |
17:30 | se6ast1an | but not adding anything new (maybe only minor additions, nothing major)
| |
17:30 | se6ast1an | so a lot of considerations and discussions have started about what an AXIOM Micro R2.1 could be exactly
| |
17:31 | se6ast1an | the goal is to make it very affordable so reaching a certain production volume is vital
| |
17:32 | se6ast1an | but who could be interested in it
| |
17:32 | Bertl | how about a crowdfunding campaign with a given target volume?
| |
17:32 | se6ast1an | yes that would indeed be one approach
| |
17:33 | Bertl | (once the price estimate and design has been fixed)
| |
17:33 | aombk2 | joined the channel | |
17:33 | se6ast1an | anuejn / vup also said they do not want to fund development
| |
17:33 | aombk | left the channel | |
17:33 | se6ast1an | rather develop until its ready for production and then funding the production and fulfil right away
| |
17:33 | Bertl | yes, that's what I meant
| |
17:34 | se6ast1an | yes, so currently a lot of discussion is ongoing what a Micro R2.1 could cater to users
| |
17:34 | se6ast1an | a better webcam
| |
17:35 | se6ast1an | for recording lectures or streaming conferences
| |
17:35 | se6ast1an | FOSDEM was very interested in this
| |
17:35 | se6ast1an | of course it should also be a development platform (Zynq + Image acquisition)
| |
17:35 | se6ast1an | but maybe it can be more than that already
| |
17:36 | se6ast1an | that a raspberry pi camera cannot do ( which we will never be able to compete with from the price anyway)
| |
17:36 | xthenode | joined the channel | |
17:37 | se6ast1an | thats it from my side
| |
17:37 | se6ast1an | Bertl: the finishing moves?
| |
17:37 | Bertl | sure, thanks!
| |
17:38 | Bertl | I spent most of the time looking at the schematics and board designs for the panel this week
| |
17:38 | xthenode | hello from xthenode aka medusade...
| |
17:38 | Bertl | over and over again, to make sure that we do not have overlooked any other issues there
| |
17:39 | Bertl | in this process, I did a board rendering (2.1D), which required to update our scripts to imagemagick v7
| |
17:40 | Bertl | which took surprisingly long because of a subtle imagemagick bug which looked like some interfaces had changed but instead they were just buggy
| |
17:41 | Bertl | the board renderings can be seen here (not the latest though): http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/AXIOM/BETA/PANEL/axiom_beta_mixed_panel.top.png http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/AXIOM/BETA/PANEL/axiom_beta_mixed_panel.bottom.png
| |
17:42 | se6ast1an | tripple checking is surely tedious work, but its much appreciated and I hope we can place a new order very soon
| |
17:42 | Bertl | I also finished the TE0714 carrier board which we plan to use for testing our impedance/loss test strips on the edge of the panel
| |
17:42 | Bertl | so we should be able to order that together with the panels
| |
17:43 | se6ast1an | most excellent!
| |
17:43 | Bertl | I further did some more testing with the 'new' power board and found a tricky issue with the CSO power supply there
| |
17:44 | Bertl | which basically has been haunting us since the early power board designs and can, under certain circumstances, lead to 5V on the 3.3V power rails for the CSO modules
| |
17:45 | Bertl | so we got that fixed as well now and so far it looks really good (fingers crossed)
| |
17:45 | Bertl | I think, if nothing unexpected pops up, we should be ready in the second half of this week
| |
17:46 | se6ast1an | perfect
| |
17:46 | Bertl | as usual, any additional reviews are more than welcome!
| |
17:46 | se6ast1an | did you also look at the impedance isolated gerber layers to highlight the LVDS layers?
| |
17:47 | Bertl | i.e. do not hesitate to look through the files and report any findings and/or ask if there are any potential issues
| |
17:48 | Bertl | I had a quick look and we adjusted all the net classes to match the LVDS traces, so as discussed with BAndiT1983, it should be fairly straigt forward to pick those by class directly from the board files
| |
17:49 | Bertl | my suggestion would be to create a 'new' board file which only contains traces ('wires') from the LVDS class and simply generate gerbers for that as well
| |
17:49 | Bertl | those can then be used/combined with the 'normal' board gerbers to locate/highlight the relevant traces
| |
17:49 | se6ast1an | we already have everything ready
| |
17:49 | se6ast1an | https://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema/pcb-paneliser/tree/master/output_impedance_filtered/output_stage1
| |
17:49 | Bertl | perfect then
| |
17:50 | Bertl | finally I also found some time to update kicad to the latest development release
| |
17:50 | se6ast1an | I was more intereted if we need to update the results, but I assume the LVDS traces didnt change anywhere
| |
17:50 | Bertl | we should not assume anything and always do a full build
| |
17:50 | se6ast1an | and if you had look at the results and if they match your expectations
| |
17:50 | Bertl | not yet
| |
17:50 | se6ast1an | ok
| |
17:51 | Bertl | kicad now can do round trace segments (they are called fillet tracks)
| |
17:51 | Bertl | also the UI is much more flexible and can be configured to work with easily
| |
17:52 | Bertl | there are still some minor issues, especially with the trace rounding but I'm optimistic that this will be resolved in the near future
| |
17:52 | Bertl | let's hope that it will be useable in the upcoming 6.x release
| |
17:53 | Bertl | that's it from my side for today.
| |
17:53 | se6ast1an | great, many thanks, anyone else with topics/questions?
| |
17:53 | se6ast1an | xthenode: you just wrote us an email, would you like to discuss it here?
| |
17:54 | se6ast1an | you wrote "I'm interested in working with the camera sensor using the now totally cool raspberry pi for the purpose of ultra large image capture of fine art."
| |
17:54 | xthenode | sure
| |
17:54 | se6ast1an | I am not sure we can assist much on the raspberry pi front though
| |
17:54 | se6ast1an | you also wrote "I'm also interested in wide spectrum image capture for color analysis of images sensed by the camera."
| |
17:54 | se6ast1an | please elaborate
| |
17:55 | xthenode | I'v got a whole build env on the pi 4..
| |
17:55 | xthenode | work with the raw image data...
| |
17:57 | xthenode | ive done work with your raw samples and dng files
| |
17:58 | xthenode | the idea would be to hook into the sensor controller to get the raw data...
| |
17:59 | metaldent | joined the channel | |
18:00 | xthenode | the pi would be used for the portable version, but the development would be one on a pc
| |
18:00 | xthenode | done
| |
18:00 | xthenode | done on pc
| |
18:05 | xthenode | left the channel | |
18:07 | se6ast1an | right, meeting concluded
| |
18:07 | se6ast1an | we can continue with xthenode if he returns...
| |
18:08 | metaldent | hi, actually me and bluez also wanted to share some updates ':D
| |
18:12 | se6ast1an | ah great, please do
| |
18:12 | se6ast1an | has there been a daylight change btw?
| |
18:13 | metaldent | we had texted in the channel before but i think matrix is having some issues
| |
18:13 | se6ast1an | ah right
| |
18:14 | metaldent | small updates from me: i read up about some security methods to ensure proper authentication for the webUI and also discussed with BAndiT
| |
18:14 | Bertl | yeah, at the moment it's probably a good idea to stick to IRC
| |
18:15 | metaldent | i also tried to build the webUI but am having some trouble there as some dependencies are outdated and were showing errors while compiling
| |
18:16 | metaldent | that's it from me!
| |
18:17 | vup | metaldent: which webui are you talking about?
| |
18:17 | metaldent | bluez is having trouble with his computer so shall i share on his behalf?
| |
18:17 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
| |
18:17 | metaldent | vup: the one you and anuejn had built
| |
18:17 | vup | I see
| |
18:18 | se6ast1an | sure, please share bluez report
| |
18:18 | metaldent | from bluez:
| |
18:18 | metaldent | "Spent some time with the ip integrator and also vivado in general. Its all quite new to me. But i couldn't give much time because of some delayed exams that were held last week... But i will be able to give full time from this week!"
| |
18:18 | vup | maybe we can talk about the compilation problems later, as we can build it in the CI
| |
18:19 | metaldent | vup: yes please! i had a doubt in the build instruction too
| |
18:21 | metaldent | that's it from both of us! thank you!
| |
18:21 | se6ast1an | many thanks for the updates!
| |
18:21 | se6ast1an | did everything with the university letters work out?
| |
18:22 | metaldent | yes yes, we have submitted them
| |
18:23 | se6ast1an | great
| |
18:26 | vup | ok if the meeting is concluded, metaldent what problems do you have with the webui?
| |
18:28 | se6ast1an | Meeting concluded!
| |
18:30 | metaldent | vup: the doubt i have is after doing `yarn watch` what's the meaning of the step "Then open a browser and see the webui :). " ?
| |
18:30 | vup | it opens a http server on port 3000 as mentioned in the paragraph before that
| |
18:31 | vup | so navigate to localhost:3000 in your browser and the webui should be visible
| |
18:32 | metaldent | ah okay, this was it then! there was one more web file generated and i inspected that but it was blank so i thought i'm doing something wrong ':D
| |
18:33 | vup | :)
| |
18:33 | vup | did you get nctrl running yet?
| |
18:34 | metaldent | wouldn't it require the IP (or some other info) of the camera?
| |
18:35 | vup | nctrl?
| |
18:35 | vup | or the webui?
| |
18:35 | vup | (the answer is no to both)
| |
18:35 | xthenode | joined the channel | |
18:36 | metaldent | okay, i was under the impression that to control one's camera you need to have the IP of it
| |
18:36 | vup | no, the webui and nctrl will be running on the camera
| |
18:37 | vup | and just uses a nodejs backend to run stuff on the camera
| |
18:38 | Bertl | well, you kind of need to have the IP for that though :)
| |
18:38 | xthenode | so rest.json api...
| |
18:38 | metaldent | wait, the webui will be running "on" the camera?
| |
18:38 | vup | yes
| |
18:39 | xthenode | ssh daemon?
| |
18:40 | vup | well there is a ssh daemon running on the camera aswell
| |
18:40 | vup | but that doesn't have anything to do with the webui
| |
18:40 | vup | Bertl: well it implicitly knows the IP, as its the IP you are accessing the website under
| |
18:40 | xthenode | then to get the ip "ifconfig"...
| |
18:41 | vup | or mDNS / DNS
| |
18:41 | xthenode | usb 2 serial terminal?
| |
18:41 | vup | the camera also has a serial terminal yes
| |
18:41 | xthenode | then easy as pi...
| |
18:41 | vup | but usually you will plug in a wifi stick and just connect to the wifi the camera creates
| |
18:42 | vup | That one even automatically redirects you to the webui as it pretends to be a captive portal
| |
18:42 | xthenode | cool
| |
18:42 | metaldent | is the "Connect via SSH" feature mentioned in the Home working?
| |
18:43 | xthenode | so the camera is a hot-spot?
| |
18:44 | xthenode | is nfs supported?
| |
18:44 | vup | metaldent: what feature? its just information on how to connect
| |
18:44 | vup | xthenode: yes if you plug in a wifi stick it acts as a hot-spot by default
| |
18:44 | xthenode | nice...
| |
18:45 | xthenode | NFS is for nfsmount
| |
18:45 | vup | xthenode: NFS is enabled, but I don't think we have tested it
| |
18:45 | vup | but I don't see why it shouldn't work
| |
18:45 | xthenode | we were using that on set top boxes...
| |
18:46 | xthenode | it allows building code directly to the target device...
| |
18:46 | vup | sure
| |
18:46 | xthenode | and gdb remote debugging...
| |
18:47 | vup | it might not be as performant but sshfs would a a easy alternative that definitely works
| |
18:47 | metaldent | nctrl is running i think..
| |
18:47 | Bertl | off for now ... bbl
| |
18:47 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_oO
| |
18:47 | vup | metaldent: if you set it up correctly you should be able to see stuff under register explorer then
| |
18:47 | xthenode | left the channel | |
18:48 | xthenode | joined the channel | |
18:55 | metaldent | okay, trying...
| |
18:57 | xthenode | gotta run so I'll respond about what I want do with email, and it can be cpoied here for others to see...
| |
18:58 | se6ast1an | sure
| |
18:58 | xthenode | left the channel | |
19:15 | metaldent | left the channel | |
19:53 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
| |
21:12 | aombk2 | left the channel | |
21:14 | aombk2 | joined the channel | |
21:16 | EmilJ | I wonder if a FOSS webcam would appeal to the same type of people who buy Talos POWER9 workstations
| |
21:16 | EmilJ | those have open source firmware
| |
21:21 | vup | maybe, there is still the closed source bootrom of the zynq...
| |
21:22 | anuejn | and the closed hardware zynq dev board ;)
| |
21:24 | vup | yeah
| |
21:25 | vup | maybe we will change that at some point in the future
| |
21:32 | EmilJ | oh right, ew
| |
21:33 | EmilJ | what would we need to make that real? A Lattice part with DDR and HDMI-capable serdes right?
| |
21:34 | EmilJ | To what degree are the ARM cores crucial for what the Micro is?
| |
21:35 | vup | well depends, a lattice part + DDR would probably be a downgrade compared to what one can do now with the micro
| |
21:35 | vup | so maybe just a custom zynq board
| |
21:36 | vup | the ARM cores give a lot more performance than any softcore will give
| |
21:36 | vup | so you can do a lot more there (like comfortably boot linux and run a bunch of software there)
| |
21:37 | EmilJ | I'd also like to point out that the 2.2um pixels sound pretty nice - the RPi HQ camera has half the per-pixel surface area
| |
21:37 | EmilJ | hmmm, now I'm curious how usable would be Zephyr on a soft-core
| |
21:41 | aombk2 | left the channel | |
21:42 | aombk2 | joined the channel | |
21:57 | aombk2 | left the channel | |
21:58 | aombk2 | joined the channel | |
22:41 | lexano | left the channel | |
22:43 | lexano | joined the channel | |
23:19 | aombk2 | left the channel | |
23:20 | aombk2 | joined the channel | |
23:27 | aombk2 | left the channel | |
23:29 | aombk2 | joined the channel | |
23:54 | aombk2 | left the channel | |
23:57 | Spirit532 | left the channel | |
23:57 | Spirit532 | joined the channel | |
23:58 | aombk | joined the channel |