| 00:08 | hozer | left the channel |
| 00:13 | hozer | joined the channel |
| 00:57 | Bertl | off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
|
| 00:57 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
|
| 02:38 | troy_s | joined the channel |
| 05:35 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
|
| 05:35 | Bertl | morning folks!
|
| 05:37 | cbohnens | changed nick to: cbohnens|away
|
| 06:20 | intracube | joined the channel |
| 06:26 | Bertl | off for now ... bbl
|
| 06:26 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_oO
|
| 06:51 | intracube | left the channel |
| 06:57 | Guest78145 | left the channel |
| 07:21 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 07:27 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 07:30 | tezburma | joined the channel |
| 07:39 | intracube | joined the channel |
| 08:43 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 09:08 | John_K | hey all
|
| 09:08 | Bertl_oO | hey John_K!
|
| 09:08 | John_K | I'm getting ready to assemble a few Beta boards this week
|
| 09:09 | John_K | running into some issues figuring out what components to order though, none of the resistors on the Main Board have values, etc....
|
| 09:09 | Bertl_oO | yeah, that's because not all of them are fixed yet
|
| 09:10 | Bertl_oO | let me know which value you are missing, I should be able to tell you
|
| 09:10 | John_K | all R's on Main Board
|
| 09:10 | Bertl_oO | the pullups around the i2c mux are 4k7
|
| 09:10 | Bertl_oO | the pullups for the pic are 10k
|
| 09:11 | John_K | also curious which height specifier was used for the JX1, 1,3,4 seem to be options (61083-10*400LF)
|
| 09:11 | Bertl_oO | and the termination resistors are currently unpopulated
|
| 09:11 | Bertl_oO | for the LVDS pairs you probably want 100R (those are the 0201 ones)
|
| 09:12 | Bertl_oO | anything missing?
|
| 09:12 | John_K | matching what you said to R #'s
|
| 09:13 | John_K | there are some 0402's between the PCIE connectors
|
| 09:13 | John_K | guessing those are the i2c mux
|
| 09:13 | Bertl_oO | yep, precisely
|
| 09:14 | John_K | is pull down for PIC also 10k?
|
| 09:14 | Bertl_oO | that would be the termination
|
| 09:15 | Bertl_oO | i.e. probably 50R later, but for now leave unpopulated
|
| 09:17 | John_K | what about resistors near T1/T2?
|
| 09:17 | John_K | and resistor for the buzzer
|
| 09:17 | Bertl_oO | ah, yes, we didn't fix them yet, but the usual protection should do
|
| 09:18 | Bertl_oO | for the buzzer we used 15R for now
|
| 09:20 | Bertl_oO | but I have to admit, we haven't tested the buzzer yet :)
|
| 09:20 | John_K | hehehe that's fine, I'm considering omitting it
|
| 09:21 | John_K | but may include it just to play with later on
|
| 09:21 | Bertl_oO | yeah, that's what we did
|
| 09:22 | John_K | is the 2-pin header for an external speaker?
|
| 09:22 | John_K | or status LED or something
|
| 09:23 | John_K | it's the other MOSFET circuit besides the speaker
|
| 09:30 | Bertl_oO | that one is for fan control
|
| 09:30 | John_K | aha
|
| 09:30 | Bertl_oO | i.e. to control a fan usually attached to the microzed FPGA heatsink
|
| 09:31 | John_K | that makes sense
|
| 09:31 | John_K | does the uZed burn that much power with the current design? or just being forward looking?
|
| 09:35 | John_K | ok one last question for the main board, what height connectors were used for PB-SW/PB-SE the DF12 components and uZed mating connectors (61083-10*400LF)
|
| 09:35 | cbohnens|away | changed nick to: cbohnens
|
| 09:38 | Bertl_oO | some kind of cooling is required, otherwise the FPGA will overheat
|
| 09:39 | Bertl_oO | the DF12 are only available up to 5mm and the 61083 are available in 4-8mm IIRC
|
| 09:39 | Bertl_oO | so we did choose the 5mm variant, but 4mm should be possible as well
|
| 09:39 | Bertl_oO | (5mm stacking height)
|
| 09:40 | John_K | ok, 5mm variant for each?
|
| 09:40 | Bertl_oO | yes, they have to have the same height
|
| 09:40 | Bertl_oO | (DF12 and 61083 that is)
|
| 09:40 | John_K | makes sense
|
| 09:41 | Bertl_oO | I'm currently in a train to munich, and the connection is a little flakey
|
| 09:42 | John_K | it's ok - it meshes well with me filling out these BOMs for order :)
|
| 09:42 | Bertl_oO | where are you ordering?
|
| 09:43 | Bertl_oO | I probably asked that last time, but I don't remember :)
|
| 09:43 | John_K | I'm in California, so trying Digikey for most
|
| 09:43 | John_K | I've got the CMV12000 and BGA sockets already
|
| 09:43 | Bertl_oO | ah, okay, please be so kind and add the part numbers to the wiki or send them to se6astian
|
| 09:44 | John_K | of course, I've been going off the Google Docs and modifying a copy for now
|
| 09:44 | John_K | is there any harm in fully populating the power board?
|
| 09:46 | John_K | or should I just DNP components as shown on the v0.18 photo on the wiki? (for me v0.22 board)
|
| 09:54 | Bertl_oO | no harm in adding additional regulators, they will consume a little more power but that's it
|
| 10:01 | John_K | what values are the Trim Resistors for the regulators?
|
| 10:01 | John_K | 10k? 100k?
|
| 10:04 | matray1 | joined the channel |
| 10:14 | se6astian | 100k
|
| 10:14 | se6astian | for best range 18k to gnd
|
| 10:14 | se6astian | 10k trim
|
| 10:15 | se6astian | output 43k
|
| 10:15 | se6astian | which gives a range of 1.389V to 3.667V
|
| 10:15 | se6astian | greetings from herbert :)
|
| 10:15 | se6astian | his laptop keeps disconnecting from the train wifi
|
| 10:15 | se6astian | we are getting close to salzburg
|
| 10:15 | John_K | I figured as much
|
| 10:15 | John_K | nice
|
| 10:16 | John_K | I'm slightly confused as to your first four lines
|
| 10:16 | John_K | the trim pots should all be 100k?
|
| 10:17 | tezburma | left the channel |
| 10:19 | Bertl_oO | we figured that the voltage range for most sensors will be between 1.5 and 3.5V
|
| 10:19 | John_K | makes sense
|
| 10:19 | Bertl_oO | so the most generic option is to have 18k/100k/43k
|
| 10:19 | Bertl_oO | for the CMV12k (if you consider that sensor only) you can also go for
|
| 10:20 | John_K | I'm going to be playing with both CMV12k and CMV20k only
|
| 10:20 | Bertl_oO | 20k/100k/62k
|
| 10:20 | Bertl_oO | which will give you 1.681V - 3.731V
|
| 10:20 | John_K | for NW/NN/NE respectively?
|
| 10:22 | John_K | (might be an idea to drive these with a DAC from a small uC in the future instead of using trim pots)
|
| 10:24 | Bertl_oO | check with the datasheet, the internal reference is 0.41V IIRC so you can do the math to figure out the ranges
|
| 10:24 | Bertl_oO | in the future we will completely rework the power board and add a management unit
|
| 10:25 | John_K | yeah that makes sense
|
| 10:26 | Bertl_oO | especially as the sensor frontend is planned to be "plug and play" i.e. the power board adjusts the voltages for the sensor accordingly
|
| 10:26 | Bertl_oO | (this is for example required when rotating or swapping out the sensor)
|
| 10:28 | John_K | absolutely. I started making an interface board for the CMV20K but am going to have to change the size of the sensor board as the sensor covers the current mounting holes
|
| 10:30 | tezburma | joined the channel |
| 10:31 | Bertl_oO | shouldn't be a problem (the mounting holes)
|
| 10:32 | Bertl_oO | i.e. there should be enough space below the sensor for a screw head, and the sensor itself will use different holes to attach it to a lens mount
|
| 10:32 | John_K | was considering eliminating the dummy interface board and fabbing a larger PCB that matches with the main board
|
| 10:33 | Bertl_oO | that would be possible but would also break the modularity
|
| 10:33 | John_K | probably, yeah. I need to figure out what kind of a socket I can use for the CMV20k as well
|
| 10:33 | John_K | true
|
| 10:34 | John_K | What other types of things have been imagined to replace the dummy board?
|
| 10:34 | Bertl_oO | we investigated the socket 1 for the cmv20k
|
| 10:35 | Bertl_oO | the dummy board will be replaced by a smart FPGA board to connect all the 80 LVDS lanes available on the sensor interface
|
| 10:35 | John_K | the purpose made socket (by that company I can't remember)?
|
| 10:36 | Bertl_oO | nah, the intel zif socket, but I'm sure andon is selling a socket for the cmv20k as well
|
| 10:36 | John_K | ah
|
| 10:36 | Bertl_oO | but the cmv20k should not be very problematic because of the large pitch
|
| 10:40 | Bertl_oO | i.e. I'm sure there are several socket solutions available
|
| 10:40 | John_K | right
|
| 10:42 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 10:47 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 10:47 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 11:07 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 12:13 | cbohnens | changed nick to: cbohnens|away
|
| 13:16 | Bertl_oO | off for a nap ... bbl
|
| 13:16 | Bertl_oO | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
|
| 13:57 | matray1 | left the channel |
| 15:20 | danieeeel | left the channel |
| 15:22 | LordVan | joined the channel |
| 15:28 | danieeeel | joined the channel |
| 16:54 | irieger | Hey folks. Has anyone seen some strange data coming from the sensor when taking the same image/exposure another time? I have taken a shot 2 hours ago which had a max raw value of 4092 so used the 12 bit up to the top. Now I have the same setup, same exposure of the lights (checked double with light-meter), same aperture, same sensor registers for everything and the image maxes out at code value 3199
|
| 16:56 | se6astian | hi irieger
|
| 16:56 | irieger | drives me nuts currently. I'm just trying to tune the sensor output to have a bit more dynamic range ...
|
| 16:56 | se6astian | very strange
|
| 16:56 | se6astian | did you reboot the camera already?
|
| 16:57 | irieger | was out in between. But checked the sensor register and except of the temp sensor of the sensor everything is the same. And temp register was only 1 bit less and in a second capture 1 bit more so should make much off a difference
|
| 17:00 | alexML | irieger: only the max value is different, or also the median?
|
| 17:00 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 17:00 | irieger | haven't checked that.
|
| 17:00 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 17:00 | irieger | wait a second.
|
| 17:01 | irieger | median for the img with max 4092 is 1302, for the other it is 1277
|
| 17:02 | alexML | median ratio is 1.02
|
| 17:03 | alexML | so, the exposure appears to have changed by 0.03 stops
|
| 17:04 | alexML | the peak is likely a specular highlight (just a guess, since I didn't see the raw files)
|
| 17:07 | irieger | damn. you are right. Should go to bed. This stuff makes me tired ;-)
|
| 17:08 | se6astian | :)
|
| 17:09 | irieger | It's quite difficult with all the stuff interacting when changing just one register having to tune everything else and just see what improved or got worse
|
| 17:10 | irieger | Could someone take apart a Blackmagic camera and record the SPI when they set the sensor up? ;-)
|
| 17:23 | se6astian | I thought you have a BM 4k? :D
|
| 17:24 | irieger | Jep. But I neither have the will to destroy it (the case seems not to be made to be opened), nor do I have the equipment and knowledge to meassure the serial interface ;-)
|
| 17:26 | irieger | alexML: Btw. it's more some wrongly coming pixel value than a specular highlight. I'm currently overexposing a exposure chart a few stops
|
| 17:30 | alexML | ah, quite likely, since this sensor doesn't clip sharply to white
|
| 17:32 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl_oO
|
| 17:59 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 18:58 | alexML | some progress on correcting pattern noise: http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=11787.msg158766#msg158766
|
| 18:59 | arpu_ | left the channel |
| 18:59 | arpu | joined the channel |
| 19:01 | danieeeel | what is the ISO on those? seems to be pretty noisy given that the illumination feels like enough
|
| 19:03 | alexML | no idea, they are from Ursa Mini, and there's nothing obvious in the exif
|
| 19:06 | alexML | read noise seems to be about 3 units
|
| 19:09 | alexML | in the original exif (16-bit DNG), white level is 27580, so in the 12-bit DNGs, it's 1724
|
| 19:09 | alexML | so, about 9 stops of DR
|
| 19:10 | slikdigit | joined the channel |
| 19:11 | alexML | probably somewhere around iso 1000, from my old calculations
|
| 19:11 | tezburma | left the channel |
| 19:44 | mgielda|away | left the channel |
| 19:44 | se6astian|away | left the channel |
| 19:44 | philippej | left the channel |
| 19:44 | philippej|away | joined the channel |
| 19:44 | se6astian|away | joined the channel |
| 19:44 | philippej|away | changed nick to: philippej
|
| 19:44 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 19:44 | mgielda|away | joined the channel |
| 19:44 | karol|away | left the channel |
| 19:45 | karol|away | joined the channel |
| 19:45 | Bertl_oO | left the channel |
| 19:45 | Bertl_oO | joined the channel |
| 20:08 | arpu | left the channel |
| 20:09 | arpu | joined the channel |
| 21:25 | Bertl_oO | off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
|
| 21:25 | Bertl_oO | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
|
| 21:33 | LordVan | left the channel |
| 21:33 | se6astian | off to bed too
|
| 21:33 | se6astian | good night :)
|
| 21:39 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 22:32 | aombk | left the channel |
| 22:34 | aombk | joined the channel |
| 22:34 | troy_s | alexML: What technique are you using to find the matrix off of those passports?
|
| 22:47 | alexML | troy_s: matching with an image from a Nikon camera
|
| 22:48 | alexML | (not quite exact, but better than random :P )
|
| 22:48 | troy_s | ?
|
| 22:48 | troy_s | Just using curves or?
|
| 22:48 | alexML | I've matched the hue from the square boxes
|
| 22:49 | alexML | https://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema/misc-tools-utilities/blob/master/color-calibration/match_hues.m
|
| 22:59 | danieeeel | left the channel |