00:14 | derWalter | mhhh... mh...
| |
00:16 | derWalter | @bertl u always said that the crowdfunding campaign starts when the EU project application is trough, so how did it go then?
| |
00:17 | Bertl | nah, never said that, the EU funding is completely independant and targets the AXIOM gamma
| |
00:18 | Bertl | and it is currently being processed :)
| |
00:23 | derWalter | when do you think you get the result?
| |
00:24 | Bertl | with the EU you never know, but we knew that it would take several months, up to a year
| |
00:25 | derWalter | woha... well... i know i guy in vienna, who raised 2,5 millions per year for his assosiation
| |
00:26 | derWalter | he nearly applied for the head of the wiki foundation, but didnt do it in the end, cause wiki was to screwed up back than (and i guess still is :P)
| |
00:28 | derWalter | we where planing "a thing" together some years back in time, but i ve never finished the concept, as it became to large and i wasnt ready for it back than...
| |
00:29 | derWalter | say if the eu is opting out but the beta crowd funding suceeds, is there roadmap to get to axiom gamma and vice versa?
| |
00:29 | derWalter | or do you need both, to get going?
| |
00:31 | Bertl | well, without AXIOM Beta, there will be little development around the AXIOM camera, so the Gamma might still be doable with the EU grant, but naturally at lower quality
| |
00:31 | Bertl | the AXIOM Beta itself is completely independant from the Gamma of course
| |
00:50 | derWalter | but without eu money no gamma?
| |
00:51 | Bertl | well, there will be an AXIOM Gamma sooner or later, but of course, the timeframe and the quality depends on the available resources
| |
00:51 | derWalter | okay, so even if the crowdfunding and the eu funding fails, you are still going for the gamma?
| |
00:51 | Bertl | yes, but it will take some time of course
| |
00:52 | derWalter | i am asking this, cause i read that you said that if the crowdfunding fails you dont know if there will be a gamma
| |
00:52 | derWalter | (somewhere in the chat logs from yesterday or so)
| |
00:53 | Bertl | it might not be like the Gamma we planned
| |
00:53 | derWalter | i am always thinking fundraising money to buy a house on the countryside and get all the developers there, to live cheap and healthy, save a lot of money and time for development :D
| |
00:54 | derWalter | i am thinking about that for around 15 years by now...
| |
00:54 | Bertl | sounds good but probably won't work for most developers, as they have families and regular work which actually pays their bills, etc
| |
00:55 | Bertl | (where developers here refer to open source and free software developers)
| |
00:55 | derWalter | i always wanted to start out with a cellar in a internetcafe style, but different in the way that you can rent 4-6m² boxes, with a desk and a bench to sleep at, the restroom, showroom, kitchen and livingroom are shared spaces
| |
00:56 | derWalter | well, the bills would be cut down quite a bit, by moving into a shared house on the countryside
| |
00:56 | derWalter | right now i am experimenting with the work which needs to be done to get most of the food i need over a year from a garden
| |
00:57 | Bertl | yeah, but do you want to leave your family and friends and live in 4-6m² boxes?
| |
00:57 | derWalter | na, that where dreams in my youth, when that was enough room :D
| |
00:57 | derWalter | when the virtual world was basically my whole live
| |
00:58 | derWalter | now that i am getting older, nature becomes more and more important to me
| |
00:58 | derWalter | and community
| |
00:58 | derWalter | quite the opposite as you can see :D
| |
00:59 | derWalter | btw
| |
00:59 | derWalter | i am thinking of doing a batterypack prototype
| |
01:00 | derWalter | do you know where to go to build one, or in other words, do you have good connections to the tu-workshops, metalab and/or angewandte?
| |
01:01 | derWalter | and is the socket connection layout for the modules of the beta done yet?
| |
01:09 | Bertl | no special connections in this regard, but you can certainly contact the metalab folks or the team members from 'angewandte'
| |
01:09 | Bertl | we have a preliminary connector layout for the shields, but it is not fixed yet
| |
01:10 | Bertl | http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/AXIOM/BETA/io_shield_l.png
| |
01:10 | Bertl | http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/AXIOM/BETA/io_shield_r.png
| |
01:11 | derWalter | how to identify the people from the angewandte?
| |
01:12 | derWalter | what cad program do you use for your layouts and renderings?
| |
01:15 | Bertl | currently we are using Eagle but we plan to switch to KiCad
| |
01:15 | Bertl | for renderings you have to talk with sebastian, I've no idea what was used
| |
01:22 | derWalter | okay :)
| |
01:24 | derWalter | well, i guess thats enough information for me now :)
| |
01:24 | derWalter | as i ve to get up as early as seven? ... i ll go to bed now ^^ cya in a few days bb
| |
01:24 | Bertl | cya
| |
01:28 | derWalter | left the channel | |
01:39 | Bertl | off to bed as well ... have a good one everyone!
| |
01:39 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
| |
02:25 | intracube | left the channel | |
04:33 | Morethink | joined the channel | |
04:34 | Morethink | left the channel | |
05:42 | aombk | oh cern ohl i see
| |
05:43 | aombk | you should shoot a test video in there near an accelerator, right?
| |
07:13 | Meinereiner | joined the channel | |
07:51 | sb0_ | joined the channel | |
07:58 | dakorl | joined the channel | |
08:24 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
| |
08:24 | Bertl | morning folks!
| |
08:24 | Bertl | aombk: we did :)
| |
08:25 | Bertl | but it was desy (EHSM) not cern
| |
08:32 | dakorl | Hi Bertl, will there be a RTC in the Beta?
| |
08:39 | sb0_ | left the channel | |
08:42 | Bertl | yes
| |
09:07 | darthrake | left the channel | |
09:07 | darthrake | joined the channel | |
09:26 | dakorl | I didn't find a RTC on the picozed, so which chip will you use? It would be good for timelapse to rtcwake the system to save power...
| |
09:39 | Bertl | it is part of the PIC32
| |
09:40 | Bertl | http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/60001191C.pdf
| |
12:10 | Meinereiner | Good Morning! If you are still interested in the 3D LUT module I wrote you can read about it in parts of my bachelors thesis here:
| |
12:10 | Meinereiner | https://www.filesplat.com/?p=d&id=A88MJzMzz2tsCYAu
| |
12:13 | Meinereiner | That includes implementation details and results for simulation, fitting, timing and so on. I also included the highest level VHDL Entity so you can see the interface. The rest of the sources and testbenches I can share once I'm done with the thesis.
| |
12:23 | Bertl | excellent! I'll work my way through it. thanks!
| |
12:26 | Bertl | as you are quite familiar with the topic, I have an interesting question to pose
| |
12:28 | Bertl | wouldn't it be possible to combine 3D LUTs with matrix operations in such a way that you basically define the matrix coefficients via an initial LUT?
| |
12:29 | Bertl | what I mean is, that what you call LUTbits actually produce the coefficients for a 'normal' matrix color space conversion which is applied to the full pixel information?
| |
12:40 | Meinereiner | I'm still actually fairly new to the subject so I can't speak from authority. I imagine one problem with that setup would be the interpolation, since you would have to do at least 9 interpolations per lookup for all 3x3 matrix coefficients instead of three right?
| |
12:45 | dakorl | left the channel | |
12:45 | Bertl | I'm more thinking of dropping the interpolation part and instead getting the coefficients from the lookup table directly and then simply applying them to the input data
| |
12:52 | Meinereiner | I imagine that would produce unacceptable discontinuities at the edges where a new set of coefficients starts.
| |
12:52 | Bertl | how does the interpolation approach avoid that atm?
| |
12:53 | Bertl | i.e. is the interpolation smooth over different LUT entries?
| |
12:55 | Bertl | trilinear suggests otherwise :)
| |
12:55 | Meinereiner | Well, with interpolation such as trilinear interpolation yo do get quatiation errors, especially when the pixel is furthest away from the eight nearest LUT support points.
| |
12:57 | Meinereiner | And the boundaries are not smooth, you'd need a higher order interpolator for that., which has a drastic increase in resource usage.
| |
12:58 | Meinereiner | But they are continuous.
| |
13:00 | Bertl | yes, they are continuous, but not smooth, and you could probably make sure that the matrix coefficients also create a contiuous result, no?
| |
13:01 | Bertl | but I'm just thinking out loud here, I haven't made any tests or simulations yet
| |
13:02 | Bertl | and certainly the traditional 3D-LUT has a bunch of advantages starting with ease of use
| |
13:02 | Meinereiner | Yeah, I think so but you'd have to include an offset.
| |
13:06 | Bertl | yes, sorry, the offset is required atm as well
| |
13:08 | Meinereiner | I did look into cubic interpolation out of curiousity but that requires 64 LUT data words per lookup which results in a bandwidth of over 1 terabit/second as well as hundreds of hardware multiplicators for that throughput. If you have a large dedicated FPGA for that it's probably doable, but I imagine you want to do other things in the camera as well :D
| |
13:10 | Bertl | right :)
| |
13:11 | Bertl | okay, thanks for the chat, I won't keep you from finishing your thesis, but I hope you are still interested in our project when you're done with it.
| |
13:12 | Bertl | for the adaptation to the xilinx environment, I do not see a real problem from what I've seen in the pdf
| |
13:12 | Meinereiner | Sure, no problem. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate.
| |
13:13 | Bertl | great! thanks!
| |
13:17 | anton | joined the channel | |
13:18 | Seku | left the channel | |
13:23 | Seku | joined the channel | |
13:52 | anton | Hi, Bertl
| |
13:52 | anton | have you seen info on Samsung XP941?
| |
13:52 | anton | it's 22 * 80mm
| |
13:52 | anton | PCI-e x4
| |
13:52 | anton | 512Gb version is 349 GBP now
| |
13:52 | anton | Anand measured 600MB/sec sequential write on PIC-e 2.0
| |
13:53 | anton | 30fps ras is about 480MB/sec if I'm not mistaken
| |
13:53 | anton | raw
| |
13:53 | Bertl | yeah, but 600MB/s is a waste of PCIe 2.0 x4 :)
| |
13:53 | Bertl | a single SATA 6G SSD can do 550MB/s
| |
13:54 | Bertl | and that means we could in theory handle 4 of them
| |
13:55 | anton | True
| |
13:55 | anton | I guess I was thinking of a "quick and dirty" internal storage for the initial release of the Beta
| |
13:55 | Bertl | and 4096x3072 at 12bit, 30FPS is about 540MByte/s
| |
13:55 | Bertl | there is nothing quick and dirty with PCIe 2.0
| |
13:56 | Bertl | if you write an open PCIe 2.0 stack on the next weekend, we take care of the required hardware interfaces :)
| |
13:58 | anton | fat chance with 0 experience :)
| |
13:59 | anton | but just to play a mental game - you're talking about smth in PL not in Linux kernal right?
| |
14:00 | anton | XP941 is taking AHCI commands over PCIe somehow
| |
14:08 | anton | 7015 somehow supports PCIe, XP941 is a PCIe device, being naive I thought it should be fairly straightforward to bring them together
| |
14:10 | Bertl | trust me, it isn't
| |
14:10 | Bertl | and yes, we are talking FPGA code here, not ARM/kernel
| |
14:12 | Bertl | but we might be able to utilize an open core or extend one
| |
14:17 | anton | out of interest what kind of "IDE" are you using for your FPGA work?
| |
14:27 | Meinereiner | left the channel | |
15:03 | jucar | left the channel | |
15:04 | jucar | joined the channel | |
15:11 | intracube | joined the channel | |
15:30 | tyrone_ | joined the channel | |
15:31 | jucar1 | joined the channel | |
15:33 | tyrone_ | Bertl: i have read the irc log and i have seen the talk about pci express. the zynq hasn't got a integrated pcie core? is it done as a soft implementation?
| |
15:36 | Bertl | it is partially hardened but the protocol is done as soft core
| |
15:38 | jucar | left the channel | |
15:38 | Bertl | anton: we are using vivado on the commandline atm, in combination with a bunch of FOSS tools
| |
15:39 | tyrone_ | ufff it's a logiccore ip :-( i didn't know that.....
| |
15:39 | tyrone_ | thanks for clarify bertl...
| |
15:41 | Bertl | no problem.
| |
15:59 | aombk | you could ask a pilot what to do when reaching stall speeds
| |
16:27 | FergusL | hahaha
| |
16:39 | Tobe | joined the channel | |
16:41 | Tobe | Hi I just have a little question, the 350 price is for the camera without the sensor and shipped. Or do I have to pay the extra 2300 when the camera is shipped (with the sensor)? Thanks for your response.
| |
16:48 | mikea | joined the channel | |
16:50 | mikea | left the channel | |
16:53 | _TiN_ | joined the channel | |
17:01 | philippej | joined the channel | |
17:12 | philippej | Tobe, the 350 euros will be used for developement. Then you'll be able to order the complete camera for 2300 € (at cost). Only people who funded development will be able to order the camera at cost.
| |
17:18 | Tobe | left the channel | |
17:52 | ctag | left the channel | |
17:58 | philippej | left the channel | |
18:03 | ctag | joined the channel | |
18:54 | tobe | joined the channel | |
18:54 | tobe | left the channel | |
19:15 | aombk | actually, the thumbnail/screenshot of the youtube campaign video is tux/open source over a danger sign. just noticed it. maybe thats not the best thumbnail, i dont know
| |
19:29 | beezel | joined the channel | |
19:34 | intracube | left the channel | |
19:39 | beezel | left the channel | |
19:40 | vic_ | joined the channel | |
19:40 | vic_ | hi
| |
19:40 | aombk | hi
| |
20:51 | vic_ | left the channel | |
21:08 | intracube | joined the channel | |
21:12 | aombk | left the channel | |
21:15 | aombk | joined the channel | |
21:58 | derWalter | joined the channel | |
22:18 | anton | left the channel | |
22:22 | intracube_ | joined the channel | |
22:22 | jucar1 | left the channel | |
22:23 | intracube | left the channel | |
22:23 | jucar | joined the channel | |
22:33 | Seku | left the channel | |
22:36 | derWalter | left the channel | |
23:25 | alesage | joined the channel | |
23:25 | alesage | left the channel | |
23:25 | alesage | joined the channel | |
23:25 | aombk_ | joined the channel | |
23:29 | aombk | left the channel | |
23:30 | aombk_ | changed nick to: aombk
|