| 02:07 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
|
| 02:11 | rton | left the channel |
| 02:28 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
|
| 07:12 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl_oO
|
| 07:43 | niemand | joined the channel |
| 08:22 | seku_ | joined the channel |
| 08:45 | pusle | left the channel |
| 09:32 | LordVan | joined the channel |
| 09:56 | pusle | joined the channel |
| 10:02 | futarisIRCcloud | left the channel |
| 10:02 | rton | joined the channel |
| 10:17 | supragya | joined the channel |
| 10:37 | supragya | left the channel |
| 10:52 | supragya | joined the channel |
| 10:59 | supragya | left the channel |
| 11:21 | supragya | joined the channel |
| 11:31 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 11:36 | supragya | left the channel |
| 12:08 | supragya | joined the channel |
| 12:10 | supragya | Hi! Bertl
|
| 12:10 | supragya | and/or Bandit!
|
| 12:11 | supragya | Had some success with T872, needed to get feedback
|
| 12:19 | futarisIRCcloud | joined the channel |
| 12:28 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 12:34 | supragya | left the channel |
| 12:50 | supragya | joined the channel |
| 13:12 | seku_ | left the channel |
| 13:23 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
|
| 13:24 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
|
| 13:24 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
|
| 13:39 | supragya | Hi Bandit!
|
| 13:39 | supragya | are you available?
|
| 13:41 | LordVan | left the channel |
| 13:55 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
|
| 14:00 | Bertl_oO | supragya: what's up?
|
| 14:01 | supragya | Hi Bertl
|
| 14:01 | supragya | I have solved T872
|
| 14:02 | supragya | need feedback
|
| 14:02 | Bertl_oO | okay, where can I look at your code?
|
| 14:02 | supragya | how can i put the git link?
|
| 14:02 | supragya | not on IRC i guess
|
| 14:02 | supragya | it has logs
|
| 14:02 | supragya | ?
|
| 14:02 | Bertl_oO | however you like, IRC, e-Mail, private msg
|
| 14:03 | supragya | i sent a PM
|
| 14:25 | supragya | hi Bertl, regarding test cases and debayering...
|
| 14:25 | Bertl_oO | yup?
|
| 14:26 | supragya | can you sugeest a test case
|
| 14:26 | supragya | different RAW12 images?
|
| 14:26 | Bertl_oO | it should be easy to find some raw12 images online
|
| 14:27 | Bertl_oO | check that they are in fact raw12 and not badly named raw16 images and use them for a test
|
| 14:27 | supragya | i will use "http://files.apertus.org/AXIOM-Beta/snapshots/"
|
| 14:27 | Bertl_oO | another approach would be synthetic images with 'known' values/patterns
|
| 14:27 | supragya | fractals?
|
| 14:27 | Bertl_oO | doesn't need to be that complicated, but why not
|
| 14:28 | Bertl_oO | for example horizontal and vertical gray bars would be a good start to see if something is wrong
|
| 14:28 | supragya | mathematic... or test images from suite?
|
| 14:29 | Bertl_oO | whatever rows your boat
|
| 14:29 | supragya | does image quality of final image after interpolation matter?
|
| 14:29 | supragya | (i guess you will say, yes)
|
| 14:30 | supragya | debayering to be more precise
|
| 14:30 | Bertl_oO | I'd say the quality is not the main focus, as long as the 'debayering' is correct
|
| 14:30 | Bertl_oO | now a good question here is 'what is correct?'
|
| 14:31 | supragya | yes. But letme get to a milestone where i can talk about this more
|
| 14:32 | supragya | What else other than qualification challenge matters in proposal?
|
| 14:32 | Bertl_oO | as debaying is mainly 'guessing values' there is no clear right or wrong, but there are some test cases which can intuitively separate right from wrong
|
| 14:32 | supragya | "but there are some test cases which can intuitively separate right from wrong" - can you elaborate?
|
| 14:33 | Bertl_oO | like for example if an image is presented in only one color channel (e.g. red) then you'd expect the output for green and blue to be zero
|
| 14:33 | supragya | " as debaying is mainly 'guessing values' there is no clear right or wrong" - i was thinking just this
|
| 14:33 | supragya | "like for example if an image is presented in only one color channel (e.g. red) then you'd expect the output for green and blue to be zero" - trivial but why not for test case
|
| 14:33 | Bertl_oO | you'd also expect the 'red' separation to be identical to the input image (at least at the sampled points)
|
| 14:35 | supragya | will look into these testings. TY
|
| 14:35 | Bertl_oO | for the student selection, the qualification task(s) are mandatory, but we will also consider previous contributions (e.g. wiki or similar) as well as the way the student 'functions' in the community (IRC, e-Mail, etc)
|
| 14:36 | supragya | okay
|
| 14:36 | Bertl_oO | and of course the proposal itself will be a factor as well
|
| 14:36 | supragya | yes, regarding the proposal, how should i go about it
|
| 14:36 | supragya | If I have selected a topic to work upon?
|
| 14:37 | supragya | or to put a proposal forth on
|
| 14:37 | Bertl_oO | first, IIRC, google has a number of 'existing' student proposals from previous GSoC events
|
| 14:38 | Bertl_oO | then, think about it like presenting a CV ...
|
| 14:38 | Bertl_oO | you get a chance to make a first impression and this will not just be based on the content but also on the form
|
| 14:40 | Bertl_oO | an short but on the point ASCII text proposal will easily trump a microsoft word document with a huge number of (useless) pages
|
| 14:40 | Bertl_oO | a LaTeX proposal with a nice layout will easily beat both
|
| 14:41 | Ljiong | joined the channel |
| 14:41 | Bertl_oO | note that this always depends on the number of students and slots we get, but last year we had to select 3 out of ~25 so it really comes down to details
|
| 14:42 | supragya | Thank you Bertl, I will get back, with new developments in the direction.
|
| 14:42 | supragya | also TY for the info.
|
| 14:43 | Bertl_oO | excellent! you're welcome and have fun!
|
| 14:43 | Ljiong | left the channel |
| 14:45 | supragya | left the channel |
| 16:15 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
|
| 16:15 | Maqs | left the channel |
| 16:17 | Maqs | joined the channel |
| 16:42 | seku | left the channel |
| 17:06 | max_bxl | joined the channel |
| 17:06 | max_bxl | hello everyone
|
| 17:20 | Bertl_oO | hey
|
| 18:10 | roger_ | joined the channel |
| 18:10 | roger_ | left the channel |
| 18:16 | davidak | left the channel |
| 18:30 | supragya | joined the channel |
| 18:30 | supragya | Hi, I am facing some axiom beta build issue, Error: ['xilinx-v2016.4.tar.gz' sha256sum does not match!!] when running [./guest-images/dev/microzed-image-1.3/build.sh].
|
| 18:30 | supragya | I have tried it multiple times, deleting the 'xilinx' file and redownloading it, still the same error.
|
| 18:31 | supragya | any pointers, please?
|
| 18:44 | BAndiT1983 | supragya, what are you trying to do?
|
| 18:47 | supragya | i am trying to solve, C++ challenge. While the main program is ready, I was trying to work on the optionals: making it run on beta-software and also debayering in another branch. However, during building the beta-software, the error occured
|
| 18:47 | supragya | Error: ['xilinx-v2016.4.tar.gz' sha256sum does not match!!] when running [./guest-images/dev/microzed-image-1.3/build.sh]
|
| 18:48 | supragya | when i run command as given in README of https://://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema/axiom-beta-qemu
|
| 18:48 | supragya | https://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema/axiom-beta-qemu
|
| 18:48 | supragya | The full report is as follows:
|
| 18:49 | supragya | [supragyaraj@supragya-pc axiom-beta-qemu]$ ./guest-images/dev/microzed-image-1.3/build.sh
|
| 18:49 | supragya | Creating build directory: /home/supragyaraj/PiNG12RAW/axiom/axiom-beta-qemu/guest-images/dev/microzed-image-1.3/buildRunning sources_auto_download
|
| 18:49 | supragya | Something went wrong?
|
| 18:49 | supragya | Possibly related to 'xilinx-v2016.4.tar.gz' sha256sum does not match!!
|
| 18:57 | BAndiT1983 | which script have you started?
|
| 18:58 | BAndiT1983 | if microzed one is not working, have you tried the one for beta-software
|
| 18:58 | supragya | ./guest-images/dev/microzed-image-1.3/build.sh (. being the root of axiom-beta-qemu)
|
| 18:59 | supragya | no, not the beta-software
|
| 19:00 | BAndiT1983 | then try it, don't have a fitting setup at the moment, so cannot try myself
|
| 19:08 | supragya | BandiT, the new error log here: (for beta-software): https://pastebin.com/a8yStfK8
|
| 19:14 | BAndiT1983 | is run_image executable? if not, then use chmod +x
|
| 19:15 | BAndiT1983 | there is also some error about boxes, which possibly hasn't create run_image
|
| 19:15 | BAndiT1983 | build_tools/outside/build_u_boot.sh: line 2: boxes: command not found
|
| 19:17 | BAndiT1983 | which linux are you using? try to install boxes package
|
| 19:17 | supragya | Manjaro (arch)
|
| 19:19 | BAndiT1983 | don't know if it was tested on that linux, i think it was mainly ubunut/debian
|
| 19:19 | supragya | the sh builder had it for Arch Linux, i guess.
|
| 19:20 | BAndiT1983 | you can edit the build script and disable boxes, as it's not installed in manjaro by default
|
| 19:20 | BAndiT1983 | can't find if there is a package for it
|
| 19:22 | BAndiT1983 | it's more of visual thing, so not really necessary, the package is available in AUR
|
| 19:29 | max_bxl | bye everyone
|
| 19:29 | max_bxl | left the channel |
| 19:31 | supragya | left the channel |
| 19:47 | supragya | joined the channel |
| 20:01 | supragya | I resolved package error, but then, C++ errors here: https://pastebin.com/HTpFfK8K
|
| 20:04 | supragya | i guess, it is certain wrong gcc/g++ version error, but I am not sure if it actually is the case.
|
| 20:06 | davidak | joined the channel |
| 20:28 | RexOrCine | left the channel |
| 20:28 | RexOrCine | joined the channel |
| 20:33 | supragya | left the channel |
| 20:44 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
|
| 20:52 | aombk2 | joined the channel |
| 20:54 | aombk3 | joined the channel |
| 20:55 | aombk | left the channel |
| 20:57 | aombk2 | left the channel |
| 22:50 | niemand | left the channel |