02:34 | dimaursu16 | left the channel | |
02:49 | jucar | joined the channel | |
03:39 | RexOrCine | left the channel | |
03:55 | jucar | left the channel | |
04:17 | Bertl | off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
| |
04:17 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
| |
06:25 | IldarValiev | joined the channel | |
06:35 | IldarValiev | left the channel | |
06:47 | ItsMeLenny | joined the channel | |
07:01 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
| |
07:02 | IldarValiev | joined the channel | |
07:10 | IldarValiev | left the channel | |
07:13 | anuditverma | joined the channel | |
07:17 | anuditverma | left the channel | |
08:36 | Spirit532 | left the channel | |
08:39 | Elbehery | joined the channel | |
08:46 | dimaursu16 | joined the channel | |
08:50 | IldarValiev | joined the channel | |
09:04 | IldarValiev | left the channel | |
09:52 | IldarValiev | joined the channel | |
09:54 | ildar123 | joined the channel | |
09:54 | IldarValiev | left the channel | |
09:55 | ildar123 | left the channel | |
10:10 | Elbehery_ | joined the channel | |
10:12 | Elbehery | left the channel | |
10:30 | arpu | left the channel | |
10:44 | arpu | joined the channel | |
11:02 | LordVan | joined the channel | |
11:10 | ItsMeLenny | left the channel | |
11:31 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
| |
11:32 | Bertl | morning folks!
| |
11:45 | Elbehery_ | hello !
| |
11:45 | Bertl | hey, how's going?
| |
11:46 | Elbehery_ | all good :)
| |
11:52 | usmankhan | joined the channel | |
11:52 | usmankhan | left the channel | |
11:53 | usmankhan | joined the channel | |
11:55 | usmankhan | good morning!
| |
11:55 | Bertl | morning usmankhan!
| |
11:57 | usmankhan | Bertl, where can I get the exact specifications of sensors and battery supply? I am looking to design a PID controller accordingly
| |
12:00 | Bertl | sensor is non trivial, as we support several sensors with different power requirements, here is a list of potential sensors with links:
| |
12:00 | Bertl | https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/Image_Sensor_Table
| |
12:01 | Bertl | on the input side, we currently max out at 2x 5V/3A, where one rail directly supplies the MicroZed and the other is used for everything else
| |
12:02 | Bertl | I think it is somewhat safe to assume that the maximum amperage for any DC/DC is about 2A (probably 1.5A is more than enough) and will typically be around 500mA or less
| |
12:02 | usmankhan | Ok
| |
12:03 | Bertl | the voltage range per regulated rail can be assumed between 1.0 (typically 1.5 is fine) and 4.0 (typically 3.6 max)
| |
12:04 | Bertl | from the eight regulated rails, typically two supply the interface board (currently unused) and six supply the sensor
| |
12:04 | Bertl | from those six rails, two can carry slightly more power than the others (because they have more connections)
| |
12:06 | Bertl | the routing fabrics and other electronics usually consume a maximum of 100mA from the 5V supply rail, so the totla for all the regulated rails can be assumed to be around 2.5A @ 5V (to keep a safety margin to the 3A max)
| |
12:06 | Bertl | *total
| |
12:08 | usmankhan | alright
| |
12:17 | Bertl | maybe add that information to the lab task when you find the time
| |
12:19 | usmankhan | Sure
| |
12:31 | Bertl | thanks, appreciated!
| |
12:52 | intracube_afk | changed nick to: intracube
| |
13:01 | usmankhan | left the channel | |
13:04 | usmankhan | joined the channel | |
13:04 | niculescu_vlad | joined the channel | |
13:04 | Bertl | welcome niculescu_vlad!
| |
13:13 | niculescu_vlad | Hi!
| |
13:14 | niculescu_vlad | Mr. Bertl, as I told you in the PM, I am interested to work on the fan controller and switching converter
| |
13:14 | Bertl | niculescu_vlad meet usmankhan, usmankhan meet niculescu_vlad!
| |
13:15 | niculescu_vlad | What I want to ask first: is the fan controller a project for summer of code, or just a test task to be accepted in the SOC?
| |
13:15 | Bertl | really depends on the complexity
| |
13:16 | Bertl | there are a number of related tasks and the fan controller can become quite complex
| |
13:16 | Bertl | first, T731 is required to actually reach the PWM I2C inside the routing fabric (FPGA)
| |
13:17 | niculescu_vlad | you mean the I2C block described in FPGA
| |
13:18 | Bertl | correct
| |
13:18 | Bertl | then the various temperature sensors are located on different busses which kind of requires interaction with the control daemon T723
| |
13:19 | Bertl | (actually T757, but T723 is the connection)
| |
13:20 | Bertl | so it can become rather complex to integrate all the parts to have a closed loop system which actually regulates the fan according to all the gathered data
| |
13:21 | niculescu_vlad | but is the gathered data related only with temperature?
| |
13:22 | niculescu_vlad | In other words, just the temperature sensors will provide the input data in the controller?
| |
13:22 | Bertl | all sensors could potentially contribute to the regulator
| |
13:22 | Bertl | for example the power measurements and the current sensor state can be used to predict behaviour
| |
13:23 | niculescu_vlad | so, there are not only temperature sensors. That was my question
| |
13:23 | niculescu_vlad | Is there a list with all the sensors?
| |
13:24 | Bertl | correct @ not only temp sensors
| |
13:24 | Bertl | btw, I suggest you use a real IRC client instead of the web interface, as the web interface becomes annoying very fast ... there are a number of available clients for all platforms
| |
13:24 | niculescu_vlad | ok
| |
13:24 | Bertl | regarding sensors, that also depends on some tasks
| |
13:25 | Bertl | currently we have several different temperature sensors in different places
| |
13:25 | niculescu_vlad | what is the purpose of this controller?
| |
13:25 | Bertl | the PWM fan controller?
| |
13:25 | niculescu_vlad | for what does it regulate the temperature?
| |
13:25 | Bertl | ah, good question!
| |
13:25 | niculescu_vlad | for a camera circuit?
| |
13:25 | Bertl | for the entire camera, but the fan is placed on the MicroZed
| |
13:26 | Bertl | let me find a picture to illustrate
| |
13:26 | niculescu_vlad | ok
| |
13:27 | Bertl | https://www.apertus.org/sites/default/files/ibc.jpg
| |
13:27 | Bertl | here you basically see the current status, where the fan is simply mounted on the heatsink of the microzed
| |
13:28 | Bertl | in the version with enclosure, the fan is planned on the top of the enclosure, basically above the PCB stack
| |
13:28 | Bertl | https://www.apertus.org/sites/default/files/AXIOM-Beta-Simple-Enclosure-Explosion01.jpg
| |
13:28 | niculescu_vlad | Great. So, it is a protection circuit. For this application, I guess over charge and over voltage circuits will be included.
| |
13:29 | Bertl | the main source of heat is the ZYNQ on the MicroZed and currently the power board, which will hopefully get less heat intensive with the switching regulator :)
| |
13:30 | Bertl | but the cooling requirements are diverse, e.g. the Zynq is happy at 90°C while the Image Sensor should stay near room temperature
| |
13:31 | niculescu_vlad | oh! So that is why you need a high yield switching regulator! To reduce the heat.
| |
13:31 | Bertl | there are also state dependent requirements, for example if you are shooting (capturing video) you want to keep the fan as quiet as possible while still preventing the system from overheating
| |
13:32 | Bertl | OTOH, if you are not recording, the fan can speed up to prepare the system for the next shoot
| |
13:32 | Bertl | yes, the heat is one reason for the switching regulator ... we are currently burning half the power on LDOs :)
| |
13:32 | niculescu_vlad | I dealt with power management applications with microcontrollers, but the algorithm is the same
| |
13:33 | niculescu_vlad | Yes. I guess you also want to keep the cooler at a constant speed. A future signal processing will easier cancel the noise if it is constant
| |
13:34 | niculescu_vlad | The adapive filters can do a quite good job with this
| |
13:34 | Bertl | so as you can see, the fan controller really ranges from 'easy' to 'hard' here
| |
13:35 | niculescu_vlad | Yes. Indeed, some research will be required at first
| |
13:35 | Bertl | Elbehery_ meet niculescu_vlad, niculescu_vlad meet Elbehery_!
| |
13:36 | Bertl | usmankhan is also working on the switcher and Elbehery_ is working on the FAN control ... so please coordinate and cooperate there ...
| |
13:37 | niculescu_vlad | Ok.
| |
13:38 | Bertl | do not hesitate to ask if something is unclear, I will try to answer as best as I can. When I'm away or asleep, I will read up when I come back and reply ASAP
| |
13:38 | niculescu_vlad | ok. Thank you very much. I will get in touch with them
| |
13:39 | Bertl | also, think outside the box, i.e. if you have a great idea how to improve this or that, do not hesitate, we even have a task for that (T727 :)
| |
13:40 | niculescu_vlad | ok. That's great
| |
13:44 | AndroUser | joined the channel | |
13:45 | niculescu_vlad | left the channel | |
13:45 | AndroUser | changed nick to: niculescu_vlad
| |
13:45 | Elbehery_ | hey niculescu_vlad, i am also working on the fan controller, at the moment i am trying to build very simple prototypes for both the slave and the pwm interface
| |
13:47 | niculescu_vlad | Ok. But are we supposed to start coding before the start of gsoc?
| |
13:48 | Elbehery_ | no but i am trying to have a very simple model that can be enhanced, re-designed in order to understand more about the design parameters
| |
13:48 | Bertl | it is always good to have something before the actual GSoC start, especially for the selection
| |
13:48 | usmankhan | I am working on the switching regulator project, and figuring out the small signal model of buck converter so that we can determine PID controller parameters. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions and I will do my best to answer what I have learned so far :)
| |
13:49 | dimaursu16 | left the channel | |
13:51 | niculescu_vlad | Sure. This is good. I can design the pid controller for the fan
| |
13:51 | Bertl | also note that as this is a FOSS/OH project, besides the GSoC participation, fame and honor awaits you :)
| |
13:51 | niculescu_vlad | And also try to implement a variant of pwm generator
| |
13:52 | niculescu_vlad | Elbehery, what pwm resolution do you want to achieve?
| |
13:52 | Elbehery_ | so far the i2c slave was implemented with an 8-bit pwm interface, but bertl mentioned that these might not be enough
| |
13:54 | Elbehery_ | an initial design is posted here "https://github.com/ELBe7ery/i2c_draft_gsoc"
| |
13:54 | niculescu_vlad | But i guess the fun is not controlled via i2c. Just raw pwm
| |
13:54 | niculescu_vlad | Like any dc motor
| |
13:54 | Elbehery_ | well, the reading are sent to the pwm via the i2c bus [as far as i understood from bertl]
| |
13:55 | niculescu_vlad | The i2c is required just to read the temperature sensors. Isn t it?
| |
13:55 | Bertl | correct, the relevant schematic is here: http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/AXIOM/BETA/axiom_beta_main_board_v0.36_r1.2.schematic.pdf
| |
13:55 | Bertl | the I2C is mainly to interface the PWM controller to the rest of the system
| |
13:56 | Bertl | it has to be located in the east routing fabric (MachXO2)
| |
13:56 | niculescu_vlad | I will try a draft for the pwm generator for the cooler. It needs good resolution to allow the command in small steps
| |
13:56 | Bertl | which has only a very special connection to the Zynq
| |
13:56 | Elbehery_ | [temp. sensors]-> [software] -> I2C valid PWM values -> [PWM interface] -> fan
| |
13:56 | niculescu_vlad | Yes.
| |
13:57 | Bertl | (see T731 for details on that)
| |
13:57 | niculescu_vlad | [temp. sensors]-> I2C -> software->valid PWM values -> [PWM interface] -> fan
| |
13:57 | niculescu_vlad | I would say that
| |
13:58 | Bertl | not all temp sensors are on I2C though :)
| |
13:58 | niculescu_vlad | Ok. Are there analog sensors?
| |
13:58 | Bertl | the sensors will hopefully be soon handled by the control daemon
| |
13:59 | Bertl | no analog sensors at the moment
| |
13:59 | Bertl | the Zynq provides an on-die temp sensor which is converted by the Zynq internal ADC and can be read from userspace
| |
14:00 | Bertl | the image sensor has a temp sensor as well, but that one requires calibration
| |
14:00 | Bertl | (details can be found in the sensor datasheet)
| |
14:01 | usmankhan | left the channel | |
14:02 | Bertl | note that small changes to the PWM circuitry are also an option for the next main board version, but we still need to handle the current interface as well (first page of the schematic I linked)
| |
14:05 | LordVan | left the channel | |
14:05 | niculescu_vlad | Ok. I have classes now but i will do a deep investigation after
| |
14:07 | Bertl | great! have fun!
| |
14:15 | Elbehery_ | how much should be the fan PWM frequency be? i am trying to identify the motor attached in the image above but can't identify it.
| |
14:16 | RL | left the channel | |
14:16 | RexO | joined the channel | |
14:19 | niculescu_vlad | Usually it is about khz
| |
14:20 | Elbehery_ | 20~25k?
| |
14:22 | Bertl | the fan we are currently using is a Fonsoning FSY31S05M
| |
14:23 | Bertl | 5V 120mA DC Brushless Fan
| |
14:26 | Bertl | we will probably use a slightly larger fan for the enclosure (40mm or maybe even 50mm)
| |
14:28 | Bertl | off for now ... bbl
| |
14:28 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_oO
| |
14:30 | jucar | joined the channel | |
14:31 | ArrunM | joined the channel | |
14:33 | ArrunM | Hello bertl, question about designing bidirectional protocol
| |
14:37 | ArrunM | i am considering about a header with port and protocol used ,no of packets etc and a second header which is protocol specific and that only used by the application receiving or sending the data again with spi ,i2c.... then data
| |
14:39 | ArrunM | every data stripped from their protocol is saved and then a packet is created
| |
14:41 | ArrunM | do my initial start only includes the part of creating packet from that data and sending it across and back modified?
| |
14:41 | ArrunM | should i need to design protocol specific header now!!
| |
14:43 | ArrunM | i will send a packet design and project flow as soon as possible !!
| |
14:44 | Bertl_oO | hello ArrunM!
| |
14:45 | Bertl_oO | keep in mind, the connection is a serial transfer over a single LVDS pair, so the protocol should be simple and efficient
| |
14:46 | Bertl_oO | also note that we probably want CRC or ECC to ensure that the transmitted information is correct
| |
14:48 | ArrunM | constructing a packet diagram, little information about no. of ports and how much size should be allocated to data part of the packet
| |
14:49 | ArrunM | ecc or crc will be taken care of
| |
14:51 | ArrunM | as i dont know what to do when error occurs , left it as is and note or make it transfer that packet again?
| |
14:53 | Bertl_oO | in both cases (CRC and ECC) an error counter should be incremented, in the ECC case, if correction is possible, account it differently
| |
14:54 | Bertl_oO | packets with uncorrectable errors can be dropped/ignored
| |
14:55 | Bertl_oO | in case of the real-time wire updates the retransmission should be automatic (i.e. the next slot will update the values anyway)
| |
14:55 | Bertl_oO | in case of bidirectional protocols like I2C, SPI, etc a retransmission is desireable
| |
14:56 | Bertl_oO | but at least the error case needs to be handled gracefully
| |
14:56 | Bertl_oO | please add information and details to the lab task where appropriate
| |
15:03 | ArrunM | ok!!
| |
15:04 | usmankhan | joined the channel | |
15:06 | jucar | left the channel | |
15:14 | Spirit532 | joined the channel | |
15:24 | IldarValiev | joined the channel | |
15:26 | BAndiT1983 | joined the channel | |
15:26 | BAndiT1983 | hey Bertl_oO
| |
15:27 | ArrunM | left the channel | |
15:28 | ArrunM | joined the channel | |
15:30 | BAndiT1983 | left the channel | |
15:31 | IldarValiev | left the channel | |
15:45 | dimaursu16 | joined the channel | |
15:45 | dimaursu16 | left the channel | |
15:45 | dimaursu16 | joined the channel | |
15:50 | RexOrCine | joined the channel | |
15:51 | MichaelH | joined the channel | |
16:02 | niculescu_vlad | Which are the communication protocols of the sensors?
| |
16:02 | niculescu_vlad | Excluding the i2c
| |
16:08 | se6astian | 32 lvds channels plus clock IIRC
| |
16:08 | se6astian | for raw image data
| |
16:09 | se6astian | not sure if you mean this by "communication" as well
| |
16:09 | niculescu_vlad | I mean just the sensors
| |
16:09 | niculescu_vlad | That dri e
| |
16:09 | niculescu_vlad | That drive the fan coltroller algorithn
| |
16:10 | niculescu_vlad | Sorry for spelling. I am mobile
| |
16:14 | se6astian | ah sorry
| |
16:14 | se6astian | then Bertl_oO will be able to help you
| |
16:14 | Elbehery_ | as far as i know, the only way to set the pwm fan signal would be via the control algorithm which is written in C/python that will send the proper speed via the i2c bus
| |
16:15 | illwieckz | left the channel | |
16:18 | niculescu_vlad | I don't think the fan speed is sent via I2C. The cooler is a simlle dc motor. You can adjust its speed by modifying the parameters of the pwm
| |
16:20 | niculescu_vlad | I was asking just about the communication between sensors and processing unit
| |
16:20 | niculescu_vlad | Other protocols like spi or uart
| |
16:20 | niculescu_vlad | I want to start implementing the verilog modules. That is why I was asking
| |
16:22 | sagnikbasu | joined the channel | |
16:27 | illwieckz | joined the channel | |
16:27 | illwieckz | left the channel | |
16:27 | illwieckz | joined the channel | |
16:27 | ArrunM | left the channel | |
16:27 | Elbehery_ | i think bertl mentioned this earlier i quote "<Bertl_oO> the sensors exist throughout the AXIOM Beta, on different busses and readable via different mechanisms" but i am not currently aware of more details
| |
16:28 | g33kyaditya_away | left the channel | |
16:31 | ArrunM_ | joined the channel | |
16:32 | aombk3 | joined the channel | |
16:36 | g33kyaditya | joined the channel | |
16:36 | aombk2 | left the channel | |
16:37 | simonrepp | joined the channel | |
16:46 | se6astian | meeting starting in 14 minutes
| |
16:55 | Bertl_oO | changed nick to: Bertl
| |
16:57 | slikdigit | joined the channel | |
16:57 | tyrone | joined the channel | |
16:58 | davidak | joined the channel | |
16:58 | davidak | good evening
| |
17:00 | se6astian | hello!
| |
17:00 | simonrepp | o/
| |
17:00 | rexbron | left the channel | |
17:01 | se6astian | right so welcome to another IRC meeting
| |
17:01 | se6astian | minutes are now stored in our wiki
| |
17:02 | se6astian | if you scroll down on the frontpage
| |
17:02 | se6astian | in the yellow box
| |
17:02 | se6astian | https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/IRC_Meeting_Notes
| |
17:02 | rexbron | joined the channel | |
17:02 | se6astian | simonrepp: will also create the ones for today
| |
17:02 | se6astian | as always please send me a PM now if you have a topic to report about in the meeting
| |
17:03 | Alvis_ | joined the channel | |
17:03 | Alvis_ | Hi
| |
17:03 | Bertl | Hey Alvis_!
| |
17:03 | Alvis_ | I'm Alvis from University of Waterloo
| |
17:04 | Alvis_ | I'm interested in working with apertus in GSoC this summer
| |
17:04 | Bertl | welcome to our channel! we are currently having a meeting, so please be a little patient
| |
17:04 | Alvis_ | I have a background in C/C++ and GPU programming
| |
17:04 | Alvis_ | Oh
| |
17:04 | Alvis_ | No problem at all!
| |
17:04 | Alvis_ | OpenCine: Raw Image Debayering Methods looks like an interesting task to me
| |
17:04 | Bertl | just hang around, it will be over in an hour or less
| |
17:04 | Alvis_ | sure!
| |
17:05 | Alvis_ | I'll leave some messages here first is that ok?
| |
17:05 | Bertl | after the meeting, yes
| |
17:05 | Bertl | the meeting happens here on this channel :)
| |
17:05 | Alvis_ | Ohhh
| |
17:05 | simonrepp | Alvis_: do write them down in your text editor, you can paste them later :)
| |
17:05 | Alvis_ | I'll wait after that then
| |
17:05 | Alvis_ | Ya, thanks!
| |
17:06 | se6astian | ok Bertl please go ahead with your updates
| |
17:06 | Bertl | okay, a number of things happened on my side since last time
| |
17:07 | Bertl | first, after the planned 4K HDMI module contribution didn't happen as expected, I started looking into it
| |
17:07 | OscaR | joined the channel | |
17:07 | Bertl | this resulted in a decision to go with the Artix FPGAs for this plugin (featuring 4 MGTs with up to 6.6GBit/s
| |
17:07 | Bertl | )
| |
17:08 | Bertl | we also decided to use the Trenz Artix modules for prototyping and thus I developed a carrier board for testing
| |
17:08 | Bertl | we will also be able to use those boards for other stuff, like testing SFP and fiber optic connections
| |
17:09 | se6astian | 4k hdmi fpga stuff noted here as well: https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/4K_HDMI_Plugin_Module
| |
17:09 | Bertl | unfortunately I spent most of the remaining time with updates on 'old stuff' and reworking AXIOM Beta PCBs
| |
17:10 | Bertl | we recently discovered, that our 3x mDP (mini display port) module is incorrectly wired
| |
17:11 | Bertl | i.e. I somehow assumed that the pinout on the mini DP connector would be the same as on the DP connector, and nobody figured that out :/
| |
17:11 | Bertl | so there is an updated version available now, which not only has the correct pinout but also is suited for mDP to HDMI adapters
| |
17:12 | Bertl | and then, as you probably experienced first hand, the GSoC 'students' are showing up, which I consider a very good sign
| |
17:13 | Bertl | that's basically all from my side, hope I haven't forgotten anything
| |
17:13 | se6astian | great thanks
| |
17:13 | se6astian | simonrepp: you are next in line
| |
17:13 | illwieckz | left the channel | |
17:14 | illwieckz | joined the channel | |
17:14 | simonrepp | real quick info mostly for the vienna apertus people: i'll be hosting a 2-3 days live art booth at the linuxwochen.at, and I requested the booth be placed next to AXIOM :)
| |
17:14 | se6astian | excellent :D
| |
17:14 | Bertl | \o/
| |
17:14 | simonrepp | = i'll be doing full days of live blender/inkscape/krita working, and maybe we can do some collab for apertus stuff if we have ideas :D
| |
17:15 | simonrepp | that's all from me ;)
| |
17:15 | se6astian | sounds great, thanks
| |
17:15 | davidak | very nice
| |
17:15 | se6astian | anyone else who wants to report anything please pm me now while I provide updates
| |
17:16 | se6astian | 1. we currently have filmmaker/dop http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6877423/ here in vienna
| |
17:16 | se6astian | he arrived today and will get a beta lent for his next project to be shot in paris
| |
17:17 | davidak | do you know if it will be his main camera?
| |
17:17 | davidak | or just to play around
| |
17:17 | se6astian | his main and only camera :)
| |
17:18 | davidak | wow, great
| |
17:18 | se6astian | another film project in parts shot with the axiom beta has premiere tomorrow: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5902750
| |
17:18 | se6astian | on our side I have been editing together small clips with beta sample footage for TT 12.3
| |
17:18 | se6astian | still a couple more to go and max will do the rest of the team talk editing
| |
17:19 | davidak | we should feature such things on the (new) website, if we are allowed
| |
17:19 | se6astian | definitely
| |
17:19 | se6astian | next topic: we are in the process of applying to https://prototypefund.de/
| |
17:19 | se6astian | to fund a few fpga development related tasks in collaboration with timvideos.us
| |
17:20 | se6astian | to pay a german fpga developer to work on tasks with overlap
| |
17:20 | se6astian | 4k HDMI for example
| |
17:20 | se6astian | or SDI HDL, etc.
| |
17:21 | se6astian | and I have been working on visual concepts how a next interation of the Beta married with the Gamma could look like
| |
17:21 | se6astian | its for the far future
| |
17:21 | se6astian | nothing to share yet publically
| |
17:21 | se6astian | but its progressing well
| |
17:21 | davidak | can we already see it?
| |
17:21 | se6astian | privately yes :)
| |
17:21 | davidak | k
| |
17:21 | se6astian | thats it from my side, no progress with the new website yet unfortunately again
| |
17:22 | se6astian | no drupal theme developer progress so far
| |
17:22 | se6astian | our hackmd installation notes.apertus.org can be officially considered dead as several people now tried to get it to run and all failed
| |
17:22 | davidak | very sad
| |
17:23 | Bertl | we can try again after a server update (which is planned anyway)
| |
17:23 | Alvis_ | left the channel | |
17:23 | se6astian | right
| |
17:23 | davidak | would it be an option to install docker?
| |
17:23 | Bertl | nope
| |
17:24 | se6astian | new axiom print flyers design is also progressing: https://lab.apertus.org/M11/36/
| |
17:24 | Bertl | davidak: server is already virtualized and thus docker won't work
| |
17:24 | davidak | Bertl: docker is containerization ;)
| |
17:24 | se6astian | also still work in progress is the search for a logo series for beta/gamma/remote, etc.
| |
17:24 | se6astian | https://lab.apertus.org/T741
| |
17:24 | se6astian | and the related font for it: https://lab.apertus.org/T744
| |
17:24 | Bertl | davidak: I know :)
| |
17:25 | se6astian | thats it from my side for today
| |
17:25 | simonrepp | ]
| |
17:25 | se6astian | and as I got no new pms
| |
17:25 | se6astian | that should also be it for the meeting agenda
| |
17:25 | se6astian | last point: next meeting
| |
17:26 | se6astian | 27.03 19 :00 ?
| |
17:26 | se6astian | in two weeks
| |
17:26 | davidak | ok for me
| |
17:26 | Bertl | sounds good to me as well
| |
17:27 | simonrepp | fine with me!
| |
17:28 | se6astian | then its official
| |
17:28 | se6astian | I will send the invitations again
| |
17:28 | davidak | thanks
| |
17:28 | Bertl | thanks!
| |
17:29 | se6astian | thanks to you as well, and I have to leave for another appointment in the city center with said DOP who is now in vienna
| |
17:29 | Bertl | have fun!
| |
17:31 | simonrepp | here are the notes for everyone who wasn't paying attention :D https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/IRC_Team_Meeting_2017-03-13
| |
17:32 | OscaR | :D Thanks!
| |
17:32 | Alvis | joined the channel | |
17:33 | Bertl | wb Alvis! meeting is over, you can paste your questions now :)
| |
17:34 | Alvis | Hi, I'm Alvis from University of Waterloo
| |
17:34 | Alvis | I'm interested in working with apertus in GSoC this summer
| |
17:34 | Alvis | I have a background in C/C++ and GPU programming
| |
17:34 | Alvis | OpenCine: Raw Image Debayering Methods looks like an interesting task to me
| |
17:34 | Alvis | I would like to learn more about the technical specifics and anything about preparation/application I should be aware of
| |
17:34 | Alvis | Thank you!
| |
17:34 | OscaR | @Sebastian, just got a reply from Cmosis. I'm sending you a mail right now.
| |
17:35 | Bertl | Alvis: BAndiT1983|away is the person you want to talk to
| |
17:35 | simonrepp | left the channel | |
17:35 | Alvis | oh ok thanks Bertl
| |
17:35 | Bertl | he should be around soon
| |
17:36 | Bertl | it is probably a good idea to check out the OpenCine repository to get a feeling for the existing codebase
| |
17:38 | Alvis | Great
| |
17:38 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
| |
17:38 | OscaR | left the channel | |
17:42 | aombk | joined the channel | |
17:43 | aombk3 | left the channel | |
17:44 | ArrunM_ | bertl i just pm you packet diag on https://lab.apertus.org/
| |
17:45 | ArrunM_ | should I paste it here?
| |
17:46 | Bertl | here is fine, if the paste is longer, use a pastebin
| |
17:47 | Bertl | you can also add it to the lab and just paste the url or task ID here
| |
17:49 | Bertl | off for now ... bbl
| |
17:49 | Bertl | changed nick to: Bertl_oO
| |
17:50 | ArrunM_ | https://ibb.co/d0PxDv
| |
17:51 | ArrunM_ | Anything else that should be considered ? width of the packet is kept small to avoid choking realtime data
| |
17:52 | ArrunM_ | Protocol data use data specific to application, ie reconstructing i2c or any protocol and the last byte store data to be transmitted!!
| |
17:55 | tyrone | left the channel | |
18:01 | Alvis | left the channel | |
18:02 | Bertl_oO | ArrunM_: note that with a serial connection, we do not necessarily have to limit ourselves to 8bit blocks
| |
18:03 | Bertl_oO | e.g. we could do 10 or 12bit chunks with 2-4 bits CRC/ECC per chunk
| |
18:03 | Bertl_oO | and assemble that to larger blocks
| |
18:03 | Bertl_oO | (just giving an example here)
| |
18:06 | ArrunM_ | as these packets are quite compact and fixed width, transmission like i2c uses 8 bit blocks
| |
18:07 | ArrunM_ | if say 10 then extras gets wasted
| |
18:07 | Bertl_oO | they would be used for CRC/ECC
| |
18:08 | tyrone | joined the channel | |
18:08 | Bertl_oO | but as I said, that was just an example, the 8 bit words are fine as well
| |
18:15 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
| |
18:16 | MichaelH | left the channel | |
18:22 | sagnikbasu | Bertl_o0:Hi. So I was wondering for the bidirectional packet communication project, do we need to create a packet for handshaking (RTS/CTS) purpose ?
| |
18:23 | niemand | joined the channel | |
18:23 | niemand | left the channel | |
18:23 | niemand | joined the channel | |
18:26 | sagnikbasu_ | joined the channel | |
18:28 | Bertl_oO | the LVDS connection can be assumed 'permanent' after initial synchronization (and maybe training for higher speeds)
| |
18:29 | Bertl_oO | i.e. there is no need for request to send or clear to send messages
| |
18:29 | sagnikbasu | left the channel | |
18:38 | niemand | left the channel | |
18:38 | niemand | joined the channel | |
18:38 | usmankhan | left the channel | |
18:43 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
| |
18:49 | ArrunM_ | left the channel | |
19:07 | sagnikbasu_ | left the channel | |
19:09 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
| |
19:14 | Alvis | joined the channel | |
19:16 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
| |
19:17 | davidak | left the channel | |
19:18 | Vlad_ | joined the channel | |
19:21 | tyrone | left the channel | |
19:26 | tyrone | joined the channel | |
19:32 | Vlad_ | left the channel | |
19:32 | niculescu_vlad | left the channel | |
19:41 | BAndiT1983 | joined the channel | |
19:42 | Vlad_ | joined the channel | |
19:42 | BAndiT1983 | hi Alvis, you had a question about OpenCine?
| |
19:46 | niculescu_vlad | joined the channel | |
19:54 | BAndiT1983 | left the channel | |
20:16 | Vlad__ | joined the channel | |
20:19 | Vlad_ | left the channel | |
20:24 | slikdigit | left the channel | |
20:25 | Alvis | left the channel | |
20:26 | Alvis | joined the channel | |
20:28 | slikdigit | joined the channel | |
20:30 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
| |
20:32 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
| |
20:43 | Alvis | BAndiT1983|away, yea
| |
20:43 | Alvis | I'm interested in OpenCine: Raw Image Debayering Methods
| |
20:43 | Alvis | Can I have more details about the task?
| |
20:44 | slikdigit | left the channel | |
20:45 | BAndiT1983 | joined the channel | |
20:45 | BAndiT1983 | just saw that you replied, but i was off
| |
20:45 | BAndiT1983 | Alvis: what parts are you interested in?
| |
20:46 | Alvis | BAndiT1983, oh it was just a minute ago haha
| |
20:46 | Alvis | The task is about porting the code to OpenCL/GPU right?
| |
20:47 | niemand | left the channel | |
20:47 | BAndiT1983 | i'm checking the logs periodically, this week i will be just sporadically available, as i have to cure a bit
| |
20:48 | BAndiT1983 | task include multiple things, it's about implementing algorithms on cpu first, accelerate them with threads and afterwards or in parallel port them to OCL and/or GPU shader
| |
20:48 | BAndiT1983 | *includes
| |
20:49 | BAndiT1983 | there was a discussion about further plan for OC and we want to target a frame server, so we can provide raw data to applications which don't understand it in first place
| |
20:49 | BAndiT1983 | so debayering will be important there and especially fast processing
| |
20:50 | BAndiT1983 | we have SHOODAK algorithm which was created by a camera guy, who is interested in the project, so we wanted to finally implement it as his team of devs is not available at the moment
| |
20:50 | BAndiT1983 | have you checked OC already and tried to compile the code?
| |
20:52 | Alvis | uh not yet
| |
20:52 | Alvis | so this task is about both coding the algorithm and porting it to GPU?
| |
20:52 | BAndiT1983 | it should be the first step if you are still interested
| |
20:52 | Alvis | yup
| |
20:53 | BAndiT1983 | GPU is just an extension of the task, it's more important to implement the algorithm so it fits OC structure
| |
20:53 | Alvis | oic
| |
20:53 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
| |
20:53 | Alvis | wait he already has the algorithm so it's not a phd thesis project right?
| |
20:54 | BAndiT1983 | there are 3 levels: 1. implement algorithm, e.g. green edge directed debayer, 2. accelerate it on CPU through threads or OCL, 3. GPU implementation (possibly that it is already covered by OCL, but it has to be investigated also using shaders)
| |
20:54 | BAndiT1983 | he invented an algorithm, which we want to reimplement on faster base
| |
20:55 | BAndiT1983 | in fact there are 2 versions, but i have to ask him about details, haven't talked to him for a long time
| |
20:56 | BAndiT1983 | it was mentioned here -> https://www.apertus.org/what-is-debayering-article-october-2015
| |
21:03 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
| |
21:04 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
| |
21:05 | slikdigit | joined the channel | |
21:05 | RexO | left the channel | |
21:07 | Elbehery_ | Hello bertl, are you online ?
| |
21:07 | RexO | joined the channel | |
21:12 | Bertl_oO | kind of, _oO means I'm otherwise occupied .... i.e. I'm working on something away from the keyboard or similar
| |
21:12 | Bertl_oO | but depending on the stuff I work on, I'm checking IRC more or less often
| |
21:12 | BAndiT1983 | i thought you are constantly amazed by something ;)
| |
21:13 | BAndiT1983 | or irritated
| |
21:13 | Elbehery_ | Aha, okay i will post the top module that i have implemented so far
| |
21:13 | Elbehery_ | on the lab comments section
| |
21:13 | Bertl_oO | BAndiT1983: yeah, but you have to try harder :) the best explanation for _oO I've heard so far was 'Operation Octopus'
| |
21:13 | Elbehery_ | please let me know once you check it, i do have more questions
| |
21:18 | Vlad__ | left the channel | |
21:18 | BAndiT1983 | Bertl_oO: seen discussions about the protocol, checked the task and it said HDL or verilog, how is it done usually in FPGA?
| |
21:19 | Bertl_oO | I hope it says HDL (VHDL or Verilog) :)
| |
21:19 | Bertl_oO | both VHDL and Verilog are HDLs (Hardware Description Languages)
| |
21:19 | BAndiT1983 | i think it does say it, had just a glimpse today, had more to do with visiting my doctor
| |
21:20 | Bertl_oO | that is basically the way you 'program' for an FPGA
| |
21:20 | BAndiT1983 | i know :D i wanted general thing about implementation, what is used to build packets, is it done in memory?
| |
21:20 | BAndiT1983 | i'm not a really bloody beginner ;)
| |
21:20 | BAndiT1983 | just had no time to power up my spartan6 board
| |
21:21 | BAndiT1983 | currently i'm using google flatbuffers for the daemon and it is really slim and fast, so i was wondering how it could be done on FPGA
| |
21:21 | Bertl_oO | I see, well, you need some kind of 'memory' (explicit or implicit) to handle any state machine
| |
21:22 | BAndiT1983 | so you build it in sdram and step over the bytes to send it?
| |
21:22 | Bertl_oO | usually no :)
| |
21:23 | Bertl_oO | while memory as 'ram' is available inside an FPGA, it is usually scarce and comes in blocks around 16kb
| |
21:23 | Bertl_oO | so typically it's more FIFOs (shift registers, etc) holding the short data
| |
21:24 | Bertl_oO | if you have to accumulate a larger (or unknown) number of packets, then FIFOs implemented with dual port memory are more common
| |
21:26 | BAndiT1983 | does opencores provide something to start with or do you want it done from scratch?
| |
21:27 | Bertl_oO | really depends on the task, there is a lot of open IP out there, but usually it is geared to a specific task and adapting it often takes more time than writing it from scratch
| |
21:27 | BAndiT1983 | and another thing which occured to me, what about the wishbone bus? have you considered it?
| |
21:28 | Bertl_oO | Elbehery_: looks good (the TOP overview and code)
| |
21:28 | se6astian | off to bed
| |
21:28 | se6astian | good night
| |
21:29 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
| |
21:29 | BAndiT1983 | night
| |
21:29 | Elbehery_ | night :)
| |
21:29 | BAndiT1983 | where is master.sendData() used?
| |
21:29 | Elbehery_ | master is defined at the tb file
| |
21:29 | Elbehery_ | sendData is a task inside this module
| |
21:29 | Elbehery_ | sends the given data to the given address over the i2c bus
| |
21:30 | Bertl_oO | BAndiT1983: wishbone is a nice and FOSS/OH bus system, but it is more suited for soft cores communicating with peripherials
| |
21:30 | BAndiT1983 | we have a hardcore ARM ;) so it seems not suiting the task
| |
21:30 | Bertl_oO | of course, it also works nicely if you have pipelines of IP cores
| |
21:31 | Bertl_oO | one problem is that the hardened ARM has an AMBA (AXI 3) interface bus system, which is not compatible with wishbone
| |
21:31 | Bertl_oO | there is an ongoing project to build a FOOS/OH bridge system
| |
21:31 | BAndiT1983 | i've seen that AXI was mentioned in lab, but it seems that there are tons of different architectures also in FPGA world
| |
21:32 | BAndiT1983 | how is the protocol triggered between the FPGAs?
| |
21:34 | Bertl_oO | the idea is to have a steady flow of packet exchange between both FPGAs (i.e. slots for data) which is established at startup
| |
21:35 | BAndiT1983 | constantly? or has it some sort of interrupt to start new exchange?
| |
21:35 | Bertl_oO | when a remote device, e.g. an I2C slave attached to the MachXO2 is addressed on the Zynq I2C bus, then the query is relayed over the stream
| |
21:35 | Bertl_oO | replies get relayed back and will be returned accordingly
| |
21:36 | Bertl_oO | changes to the 'real-time' wires will be transported and thus updated on a regular basis
| |
21:36 | Bertl_oO | an interrupt would require some kind of 'interrupt line' which is not really available
| |
21:36 | BAndiT1983 | we get info about shields at start usually, right? does it have hot-plug?
| |
21:37 | BAndiT1983 | just thinking about enumerating sensors which are present in the system, e.g. load description, ask every sensor/actor if it exists, reply to user what succeeded or failed
| |
21:37 | Bertl_oO | shields are not hot-plug-able and do not contain any information, plug-ins on the other hand are hot-plugable and always contain an eeprom
| |
21:37 | BAndiT1983 | i've dropped a couple of steps, but you get the idea
| |
21:39 | BAndiT1983 | what if some shiled were exchanged, how do we get available actors on-board?
| |
21:39 | Bertl_oO | Elbehery_: so if you have questions, now is the time to ask, before I go to bed :)
| |
21:39 | BAndiT1983 | you and go to bed? at that time?
| |
21:42 | RexO | By "go to bed" he means take his socks off and slump onto a keyboard.
| |
21:43 | BAndiT1983 | :D
| |
21:43 | Elbehery_ | aha, okay , first thing i want to make sure about, does the big picture of the system i have posted on my github is correct ! i mean am i getting the whole big picture correctly ?
| |
21:43 | BAndiT1983 | Rex, don't make me laugh as coughing hurts a bit
| |
21:44 | RexO | Have you seen Altered States? Cos that's what happens when Herbert exhausts himself.
| |
21:45 | BAndiT1983 | haven't seen it, but the pictures are telling me it's crazy
| |
21:45 | RexO | https://youtu.be/67lYG7a4YOA
| |
21:45 | niculescu_vlad | left the channel | |
21:46 | BAndiT1983 | just watched it, man, the drugs were free in that time, i suppose
| |
21:46 | RexO | It's a tale of sensory deprivation and regression. A must watch really.
| |
21:48 | Bertl_oO | Elbehery_: it is correct, but not in all detail
| |
21:49 | Bertl_oO | the Software part is running on the Zynq (hardened arm cores) which sees a 'virtual' I2C bus
| |
21:49 | tyrone | left the channel | |
21:49 | Bertl_oO | (or to be precise, a number of busses)
| |
21:50 | Bertl_oO | this particular I2C bus is then transferred via the packet protocol to the MachXO2 (routing fabric east) where it attaches to the I2C PWM interface
| |
21:51 | Bertl_oO | but except for that, it is correct and complete
| |
21:51 | Elbehery_ | Aha, do you think the design should allow more numbers of bytes for the pwm resolution ?
| |
21:52 | Bertl_oO | I really don't know, it might be more than sufficient, only time will tell
| |
21:52 | BAndiT1983 | how big is the packet for PWM?
| |
21:53 | Bertl_oO | it might be enough to pulse the fan at a really low frequency as well, way below the typical 20-40kHz, but we have to test this
| |
21:53 | BAndiT1983 | is it a stepper motor, because of pulse?
| |
21:53 | Bertl_oO | nope, just a brushless fan
| |
21:53 | Elbehery_ | Aha, great
| |
21:54 | BAndiT1983 | so it's a classical straightening of the pulse then?
| |
21:54 | BAndiT1983 | forgot the engish word -> rectifying
| |
21:54 | BAndiT1983 | *english
| |
21:54 | Bertl_oO | no rectification at the moment, but maybe we will do that :)
| |
21:55 | BAndiT1983 | i thought it's important for normal pwm, at least i know it from atmel chips
| |
21:56 | Bertl_oO | the current circuit can be found in the schematic on page 1
| |
21:56 | Bertl_oO | as I mentioned before, nothing is set in stone, and we can easily adapt the circuitry to something different if we figure that it improves things
| |
21:57 | Bertl_oO | doesn't mean that we do not have to handle the existing circuitry as well
| |
22:08 | BAndiT1983 | will be interesting to see if the motor makes unwanted noises at low frequency
| |
22:09 | Alvis | left the channel | |
22:14 | BAndiT1983 | left the channel | |
22:30 | Elbehery_ | good night :) see you all tomorrow
| |
22:31 | Elbehery_ | left the channel | |
22:37 | Bertl_oO | so, socks are basically off :)
| |
22:38 | dimaursu16 | left the channel | |
22:46 | Alvis | joined the channel | |
22:52 | slikdigit | left the channel |