#apertus IRC Channel Logs

atleast thats a pleasant thought. I agree hexnuts is pretty, but if it could be done down to the pcb level i think phillips all over might be something to consider

torq might be something that ticks all boxen. with hex there is a difference between metric and imperial that some people arent aware of, which leads to possible stripping, not so with torx

Where can i upload transperent versions of the logos in https://axiom.apertus.org/index.php?site=donate they look bad when shown in iframe here https://apertus.org/sponsors

followed the irc logs the last weeks, and even if i agree with troy about need of a standard distance from cam base to the lens mount

So you want small and troy wants something bigger?

i like the size as hidden cam on dokumentations..

its a little bit hard to make the hidden argument, and bigger is not due to heft i imagine

to any real journalist it wont comrade, right now thats a quality you can not buy at this size..

what is the other option?

troy is right, for comfortable cinematic work, or ENG-Shoulder-Shootings, it can have a different form factor, but you will archive this easily with rig - troy talked a lot about the usability - thats true about measurements, but to me: not about size

*yes

I think the main issue is inbuilt rails, but cant you have those on the rig? Are they too far away from the sensor then?

dont let us build them in, there is no need for - just let us find the right distance for the base, then ill easily mount it on a railed rig

are they called rods?

till today while on investigative work, you almost allways loose picture quality if you have to shoot undercover - or rip off your budget (or go on gopro 4 fisheye - not allways a choice).. to bridge that with the beta would be a nice side benefit

i saw comrade, nice work you're doing

philippej created T150: Research ways to make connectors more robust and avoid pcb issues. http://lab.apertus.org/T150

PhilCee: i made https://www.apertus.org/home-wip too, if you have access you can see the latest revision, what do you think?

how about calling the hardware category projects, the put opencine at the bottom there

the home-wip? The images arent very high-fi yet, thats something to fix

irony is hard on irc ;)

it would be tragic if someone felt mis-represented, so i made my best effort from my point of view

we'll see, but i dont think so. as mentioned i had a review of the logs here, and it describes pretty exact what if read by all contributors here, i think.

damn, did'nt use my english for a while..

laters :)

welcome cfelton!

hello !

Bottom line is that the design of the camera housing has much more to do with ecosystem / participant than it does about the perception of existing on an island. In truth, a camera is actually a _small_ portion of shooting.

Not really a proposal. At all.

i think everyone is on the same page now

It's tricky stuff.

LOL

basically, enclosure and camera size

haha :-)

that, or we have too many tools

Yes.

:)

:-)

Phabricator is great for example, but now we have the wonderful lack of synchronicity with the Wiki

I wanted to push the use of phabricator built in wiki, but will people accept it ...

if we'd use the phabricator wiki, it would be synced to each project (and tasks, and people and mocks and files)

Oh.

That's interesting.

That's like Fxxx?

Is there a Wxxx?

W is for workboards

It's a way to organize tasks in a project. Here is an example : http://lab.apertus.org/project/board/4/

I guess, we just tried it lightly

The bundling is quite slick.

Makes zero sense to me.

Dunno.

Hard to know what is implemented / considered and what is crap thrown at wall from behind bars.

wishlist

Easier to spot.

actually they have those nice colored tags already

the "warmer" the color gets the higher the priority scale

lab updated to latest version, db updated as well. Let me know if anything is broken

posted indiegogo update about vouchers

night night

good night