|  | 03:15 | Spirit532 |  left the channel | 
|  | 03:18 | Spirit532 |  joined the channel | 
|  | 03:20 | Bertl_oO |     vup: yes, what's the plan there?
 | 
|  | 04:05 | Spirit532 |  left the channel | 
|  | 04:09 | Spirit532 |  joined the channel | 
|  | 05:00 | comradekingu |  left the channel | 
|  | 05:01 | comradekingu |  joined the channel | 
|  | 05:09 | Bertl_oO |     off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
 | 
|  | 05:09 | Bertl_oO |  changed nick to:     Bertl_zZ
 | 
|  | 05:23 | Spirit532 |  left the channel | 
|  | 05:27 | Spirit532 |  joined the channel | 
|  | 06:25 | BAndiT1983|away |  changed nick to:     BAndiT1983
 | 
|  | 07:04 | megora_ |  left the channel | 
|  | 08:02 | namibj |  left the channel | 
|  | 08:41 | Dest123 |  joined the channel | 
|  | 08:42 | Dest123 |  left the channel | 
|  | 08:43 | Dest123 |  joined the channel | 
|  | 09:03 | WalterZimmermann |  left the channel | 
|  | 09:03 | WalterZimmerman4 |  joined the channel | 
|  | 09:12 | omar31 |  joined the channel | 
|  | 11:06 | Bertl_zZ |  changed nick to:     Bertl
 | 
|  | 11:06 | Bertl |     morning folks!
 | 
|  | 11:50 | Dest123 |  left the channel | 
|  | 12:22 | vup |     Bertl: well we want to test up to which frequencies we can reliably use a connector
 | 
|  | 12:31 | Bertl |     thought so, but what's the plan here?
 | 
|  | 12:32 | Bertl |     some kind of loopback module?
 | 
|  | 12:32 | Bertl |     or a test board which uses the connector in question or something completely different?
 | 
|  | 13:46 | vup |     Bertl: well we are starting with the 100mil headers that are already present on the current micro, using a wire bridge to loopback one pin to another
 | 
|  | 13:54 | Bertl |     wire bridge?
 | 
|  | 13:54 | Bertl |     you mean a cable?
 | 
|  | 13:59 | vup |     yeah
 | 
|  | 13:59 | Bertl |     it will be tricky to match the 50/100Ohm there
 | 
|  | 14:00 | vup |     well the connector itself also doesn't match 50/100Ohm, so keeping the cable short shouldn't make it much worse i would think
 | 
|  | 14:00 | Bertl |     really depends on the impedance changes
 | 
|  | 14:01 | vup |     yeah, this isn't really meant as a decisive test for it not working
 | 
|  | 14:02 | vup |     but if it works with that setup, it should definitely work with a more proper setup
 | 
|  | 14:02 | Bertl |     hard to tell, could work by accident as well
 | 
|  | 14:02 | vup |     how so?
 | 
|  | 14:02 | Bertl |     what exactly is the goal of the test?
 | 
|  | 14:03 | vup |     well mainly figuring out if we can just use 100mil headers for the sensor connection
 | 
|  | 14:04 | Bertl |     okay, so the connection goes  'main PCB' - 100mil header - 'sensor PCB'
 | 
|  | 14:04 | vup |     yes
 | 
|  | 14:04 | Bertl |     and the data transfer is typically in the other direction, yes?
 | 
|  | 14:04 | vup |     for most sensor I would imagine so
 | 
|  | 14:05 | vup |     the cmv12k has a high speed clock input, right?
 | 
|  | 14:05 | Bertl |     okay, so the best setup would be to create a dummy senor PCB which consists of a properly routed 'loop' from I/Os of one side of the connector to the other
 | 
|  | 14:05 | Bertl |     e.g. if you have 8 LVDS pairs for sensor connection
 | 
|  | 14:06 | Bertl |     create loops between the outer most down to the innermost
 | 
|  | 14:06 | Bertl |     all properly routed on the dummy sensor board
 | 
|  | 14:07 | Bertl |     this way you know when the loopback test works at a given frequency, the sensor will be fine and in safe range
 | 
|  | 14:07 | Bertl |     (because you traverse the connector twice for every loop)
 | 
|  | 14:07 | vup |     yes that sounds like a good setup
 | 
|  | 14:08 | vup |     the hope was we can forgo the need of the dummy sensor board if it works with the current setup
 | 
|  | 14:08 | Bertl |     well, you can test that as well, but I wouldn't draw too many conclusions from that
 | 
|  | 14:10 | Bertl |     capacitance and inductance might just cancel each outher out at the freqeuncy you test with
 | 
|  | 14:10 | vup |     hmm yeah maybe
 | 
|  | 14:11 | vup |     I was planning on doing a frequency sweep anyways (roughly 250MHz DDR -> 500MHz DDR)
 | 
|  | 14:11 | Bertl |     okay, that will definitely get better results
 | 
|  | 14:13 | vup |     using that I think we should be able to rule out most accidents
 | 
|  | 14:13 | Bertl |     could work
 | 
|  | 14:13 | vup |     but i guess we will just have to see how the results look like and then decide if we want to test it with a dummy sensor board or not
 | 
|  | 14:13 | Bertl |     definitely let me know how it goes :)
 | 
|  | 14:13 | vup |     yes, will do
 | 
|  | 14:33 | BAndiT1983 |  changed nick to:     BAndiT1983|away
 | 
|  | 16:00 | Bertl |     off for now ... bbl
 | 
|  | 16:00 | Bertl |  changed nick to:     Bertl_oO
 | 
|  | 16:06 | WalterZimmerman4 |  left the channel | 
|  | 16:22 | kunalghosh[m] |  left the channel | 
|  | 17:20 | megora |  joined the channel | 
|  | 18:29 | BAndiT1983|away |  changed nick to:     BAndiT1983
 | 
|  | 18:55 | Bertl_oO |  changed nick to:     Bertl
 | 
|  | 21:34 | futarisIRCcloud |  joined the channel | 
|  | 22:01 | omar31 |  left the channel | 
|  | 22:08 | BAndiT1983 |  changed nick to:     BAndiT1983|away
 | 
|  | 22:51 | megora |  left the channel | 
|  | 23:43 | futarisIRCcloud |  left the channel |