| 02:34 | jn_ | left the channel |
| 02:34 | jn | joined the channel |
| 02:34 | jn | left the channel |
| 02:34 | jn | joined the channel |
| 09:07 | se6astian | cool anuejn! checking right away
|
| 09:21 | se6astian | nicely done anuejn
|
| 09:21 | se6astian | can confirm the new DNGs in different software
|
| 09:21 | se6astian | Adobe Photoshop - works
|
| 09:21 | se6astian | Adobe Lightroom - works
|
| 09:21 | se6astian | RawDigger - works
|
| 09:21 | se6astian | Rawtherapee - works
|
| 09:21 | se6astian | Darktable - works
|
| 09:21 | se6astian | Davinci Resolve - works
|
| 11:18 | Bertl | yay!
|
| 17:46 | se6astian | anuejn: the colorchecker contains a mm scale with black/white lines so even though it might not be optimal as a thigher line pair pattern is recommended the resolution reduction might be evaluated with the different exposure times you collected with the colorchecker
|
| 17:47 | se6astian | half exposure time = 1 stop EV
|
| 17:51 | se6astian | of course the averaging greatly affects the noise levels
|
| 18:03 | anuejn | Yeah I think this dataset is not really suited to evaluate that
|
| 18:03 | anuejn | but it seems like it would not be too hard to do
|