| 01:57 | aombk | left the channel |
| 02:06 | aombk | joined the channel |
| 06:25 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
|
| 06:40 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
|
| 06:49 | illwieckz | left the channel |
| 06:53 | illwieckz | joined the channel |
| 08:04 | Bertl_oO | changed nick to: Bertl_zZ
|
| 08:29 | sebix | joined the channel |
| 09:00 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 12:38 | se6astian | dear community: I need your feedback regarding screw color on the AXIOM Beta compact enclosure
|
| 12:39 | se6astian | please look at https://cloud.gerade.org/index.php/apps/gallery/s/EqJsZdy8SH8c9f9#20190701_121406_HDR.jpg
|
| 12:39 | se6astian | do you think the aluminium parts match better with the slightly blueish screws eg. on the left
|
| 12:40 | se6astian | or the slightly more brownish/greyish one in the middle?
|
| 13:10 | sraj | joined the channel |
| 13:34 | RexOrCine|away | changed nick to: RexOrCine
|
| 13:46 | sraj | left the channel |
| 13:53 | illwieckz | left the channel |
| 14:05 | Nira|away | changed nick to: Nira
|
| 14:05 | illwieckz | joined the channel |
| 14:47 | Bertl_zZ | changed nick to: Bertl
|
| 14:47 | Bertl | morning folks!
|
| 14:50 | Nira | changed nick to: Nira|away
|
| 14:55 | se6astian | left the channel |
| 14:55 | se6astian | joined the channel |
| 14:55 | se6astian | left the channel |
| 14:55 | se6astian | joined the channel |
| 14:56 | Nira|away | changed nick to: Nira
|
| 14:56 | se6astian | left the channel |
| 14:56 | Nira | left the channel |
| 14:56 | RexOrCine | left the channel |
| 14:56 | philippej | left the channel |
| 14:56 | BAndiT1983|away | left the channel |
| 15:05 | apurvanandan[m] | Hi Bertl
|
| 15:06 | Nira|away | joined the channel |
| 15:06 | RexOrCine|away | joined the channel |
| 15:06 | philippej|away | joined the channel |
| 15:06 | philippej|away | changed nick to: philippej
|
| 15:06 | BAndiT1983|away | joined the channel |
| 15:06 | se6astian|away | joined the channel |
| 15:06 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
|
| 15:06 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 15:07 | RexOrCine|away | changed nick to: RexOrCine
|
| 15:07 | apurvanandan[m] | Is there some way we can use the DDR x4 8:1 of MachXO2 to make 10:1 gearing?
|
| 15:08 | Bertl | 10*4 = 40 = 5*8
|
| 15:08 | Bertl | so collecting 5 8bit values will give you 4 10bit values
|
| 15:11 | apurvanandan[m] | Ahh okay, so a SIPO will do?
|
| 15:12 | Bertl | well, you won't be able to 'shift' the bits at that speed
|
| 15:12 | Bertl | (otherwise you wouldn't need a deserializing element :)
|
| 15:13 | illwieckz | left the channel |
| 15:13 | Bertl | but you can 'select' the appropiate parts from a two byte history
|
| 15:14 | Bertl | 00000000|11111111|22222222|33333333|44444444
|
| 15:14 | Bertl | AAAAAAAA AABBBBBB BBBBCCCC CCCCCCDD DDDDDDDD
|
| 15:17 | aSobhy | Bertl: when we meet today ?
|
| 15:18 | aSobhy | we will*
|
| 15:19 | illwieckz | joined the channel |
| 15:19 | Nira|away | changed nick to: Nira
|
| 15:24 | illwieckz | left the channel |
| 15:24 | illwieckz | joined the channel |
| 15:25 | Bertl | aSobhy: the usual time, 19:00 CEST unless you have a problem with that, then we can adjust it
|
| 15:27 | aSobhy | I'm fine with that :)
|
| 15:29 | apurvanandan[m] | Bertl: I didn't get that how to do that addressing by making a LUT Ram?
|
| 15:31 | Bertl | as you can see from the example above, you always need two bytes from the input to form a 10bit word
|
| 15:31 | Bertl | so you simply keep each byte for two cycles
|
| 15:32 | Bertl | and combine those (the last two bytes) into a 10bit word
|
| 15:32 | Bertl | there will be 4 clock cycles which generate a 10bit word
|
| 15:32 | Bertl | and one clock cycle where nothing is generated only a byte is acquired
|
| 15:33 | Bertl | you need an 8bit register for that and a mux which can select the correct bits for the 10bit word
|
| 16:00 | apurvanandan[m] | Fairly clear, will ask if I get stuck
|
| 16:14 | Bertl | great!
|
| 16:15 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 16:32 | dev__ | joined the channel |
| 16:44 | RexOrCine | Is someone using the GSoC Beta?
|
| 16:45 | illwieckz | left the channel |
| 16:47 | aSobhy | RexOrCine: nope :)
|
| 16:47 | RexOrCine | Have you just been using it?
|
| 16:48 | RexOrCine | (a few minutes ago)
|
| 16:48 | aSobhy | I didn't used it for wile
|
| 16:48 | aSobhy | while (2 weeks )
|
| 16:50 | RexOrCine | Thanks. The reason I ask is because the fan makes a noise occasionally, so ideally it should be replaced. I wonder if now might be an opportune time for me to do that. Bertl?
|
| 16:50 | RexOrCine | (it's one of the early fans and the camera has been running for a very long time (24/7 for years)
|
| 16:51 | RexOrCine | Two years possibly longer.
|
| 16:52 | Bertl | RexOrCine: aSobhy is mostly using the Partial Beta
|
| 16:53 | RexOrCine | Yes, that's the one with the issue.
|
| 16:53 | RexOrCine | There it goes again. I'm not really bothered but Dan likes absolute silence here.
|
| 16:53 | Bertl | I really doubt that, as I did assemble it a few weeks ago, so the fan cannot be that old there :)
|
| 16:54 | RexOrCine | Aye I suspected it had been done.
|
| 16:54 | RexOrCine | Is it ok to disconnect it and replace it? We have a suitable fan here.
|
| 16:54 | Bertl | but feel free to install a new fan
|
| 16:54 | RexOrCine | 104
|
| 16:55 | Bertl | just make sure it is actually turning :)
|
| 16:59 | dev__ | left the channel |
| 16:59 | RexOrCine | Phwar. It's even worse.
|
| 17:00 | Bertl | well, I suggest to buy a 'silent' fan then
|
| 17:01 | dev__ | joined the channel |
| 17:02 | Bertl | Noctua for example has quite nice ones, but only 40mm so you need an adapter, which shouldn't be a big problem for the Partial
|
| 17:11 | illwieckz | joined the channel |
| 17:19 | RexOrCine | Reconnected. Replacement fan was worse. Fixed with vegetable oil. Lashings of vegetable oil.
|
| 17:23 | RexOrCine | Maybe we should watch how long that lasts and think about Noctua if it fails again.
|
| 17:24 | RexOrCine | To be fair it's pretty silent anyways, with lashings of oil.
|
| 17:24 | Dev | joined the channel |
| 17:24 | Dev | changed nick to: Guest50548
|
| 17:26 | Guest50548 | left the channel |
| 17:27 | dev__ | left the channel |
| 17:50 | RexOrCine | Oh, we don't need them now, but as it happens there are four fans in your outbox here.
|
| 17:52 | RexOrCine | changed nick to: RexOrCine|away
|
| 17:52 | Bertl | most likely the oil will eat the bearing ...
|
| 17:53 | Bertl | so make sure to check in the following days that the fan is still running :)
|
| 18:06 | apurvanandan[m] | Meeting?
|
| 18:06 | aSobhy | +1
|
| 18:07 | Bertl | yup
|
| 18:08 | Bertl | so first some feedback regarding the first evaluation
|
| 18:09 | Bertl | while the quality of the code was okay, it wasn't great and the documenation in general was lacking a lot
|
| 18:10 | Bertl | we let that slide for the first evaluation but we won't on the second, so please make sure to improve on that
|
| 18:10 | apurvanandan[m] | Ok, definitely!
|
| 18:11 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 18:11 | aSobhy | yes you are right :/
|
| 18:11 | Bertl | also looking at your proposals, you are somewhat behind, but that is expected
|
| 18:12 | Bertl | the main task now is to prioritize the important aspects
|
| 18:13 | Bertl | I haven't seen any successful FPGA to FPGA communication yet and everything around synchronization and alignment is still 'very' vague
|
| 18:14 | Bertl | so let's focus on that for now
|
| 18:15 | Bertl | regarding code quality and documentation, I suggest to check eachothers code and try to understand it ... if that fails, let the other know so that it can be improved
|
| 18:15 | Bertl | make sure that everything checked in can also be built by a third person
|
| 18:16 | Bertl | (not just a day before - or even worse a day after the evaluation :)
|
| 18:18 | Bertl | so on topic: data transfer, serialization and deserialization
|
| 18:18 | Bertl | as you both figured out by now, with two different FPGAs invovled, you seldom have the same structures or elements/units to work with ...
|
| 18:19 | Spirit532 | left the channel |
| 18:19 | Spirit532 | joined the channel |
| 18:19 | Bertl | any comments on how to address that? anything you figured out yet?
|
| 18:20 | apurvanandan[m] | Let me tell what I have figured out
|
| 18:22 | Bertl | go ahead
|
| 18:22 | apurvanandan[m] | https://ibb.co/k0QWcnF
|
| 18:23 | apurvanandan[m] | This is the architecture used for DDR x4 8:1 gearing
|
| 18:24 | apurvanandan[m] | Here DLLDELC is controlled delay element
|
| 18:25 | apurvanandan[m] | It is controlled by DSQSDLLC by the DQSDEL signal
|
| 18:26 | apurvanandan[m] | Using it we shift the edge to edge clock by 90 degree for centered clock
|
| 18:26 | apurvanandan[m] | ECLKSYNCA is inserted to minimize the skews at the edges of fpga
|
| 18:26 | apurvanandan[m] | As the DDR circuitry is on bottom of the fpga
|
| 18:28 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
|
| 18:28 | apurvanandan[m] | CLKDIVC generates the clock which we gonna use for sampling deserailized data
|
| 18:28 | apurvanandan[m] | DELAYE is the fixed delay element on the data bus
|
| 18:28 | apurvanandan[m] | DELAYE can be repalced by DELAYD for incorporating dynamic delays
|
| 18:29 | Bertl | aSobhy: everything clear now?
|
| 18:29 | apurvanandan[m] | ANd yes IDDR4XB is the final DDR x4 gearing primitive which does what its name says
|
| 18:31 | aSobhy | he has a clk received at his module so we will have some difference in common
|
| 18:31 | Bertl | what I meant was: did you understand the design and the challenges it solves?
|
| 18:32 | apurvanandan[m] | DDRX4rx_sync is the vhdl code generated by the IPexpress of Lattice Diamond. It gives greater control over the gearwork like the rx_start signal , rstn input signal for 'proper' reset of the gearwork ie it setups the gearwork in good condition
|
| 18:33 | aSobhy | not all of them !
|
| 18:34 | apurvanandan[m] | IDDRX4B takes input ALIGNWD. On pulsing ALIGNWD, it shifts by a bit ie 90 degree. It does work of bitslip.
|
| 18:34 | Bertl | good, because I would be very surprised if everything was clear from that
|
| 18:35 | apurvanandan[m] | Yes aSobhy ask doubts
|
| 18:37 | aSobhy | how can you find the fixed delay?
|
| 18:40 | apurvanandan[m] | There are four modes: BYPASS, USER DEFINED, FIXED and DYNAMIC. In fixed mode the Lattice software computes the optimum delay ( don't know how) and sets that. In FIXED mode we need to find the delay ( don't know exactly how)
|
| 18:41 | Bertl | the timing constraints and the 'wiring' gives the desired delays
|
| 18:41 | apurvanandan[m] | I meant In user defined mode we need to find
|
| 18:41 | Bertl | let's say you tell the tools that the data is synchronous to the clock, then it can calculate the required delays
|
| 18:42 | Bertl | assuming that you have a 'fixed' offset (data to clock) you can either adjust the constraints or set it manually in a delay
|
| 18:44 | Bertl | aSobhy: note that you can also use a common clock as we discussed before
|
| 18:44 | Nira | changed nick to: Nira|away
|
| 18:45 | Bertl | note that you have to get the timing constraints right for such a setup and as mentioned before, at a certain speed, you won't be able to get it right for all cases
|
| 18:46 | Bertl | i.e. you will need to have some kind of dynamic adjustment to compensate for temperature, clock variation, silicon, etc
|
| 18:47 | Bertl | what seems to have caused some confusion in the last weeks is that there are no '10:1 deserializers' in the MachXO2
|
| 18:48 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
|
| 18:48 | Bertl | but it is quite common that you do not have the perfect word length for your design
|
| 18:48 | sebix | left the channel |
| 18:48 | Bertl | there are several approaches to this:
|
| 18:49 | Bertl | - find a common denominator between the two FPGAs
|
| 18:49 | Bertl | (this will usually be a 4:1 or maybe 8:1 setup)
|
| 18:50 | Bertl | - find the smallest multiple of both capabilities
|
| 18:50 | Bertl | and the desired word length
|
| 18:51 | Bertl | (e.g. you want 6 bit, use 3x4 bit and a gearwork)
|
| 18:52 | Bertl | - use a code which matches the available capabilities
|
| 18:52 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|
| 18:53 | Bertl | obviously the last one will usually result in inefficient bandwidth usage
|
| 18:54 | Bertl | also a word on PRNG and their use for testing
|
| 18:54 | Bertl | (as this seems to have caused some confusion and unnecessary work as well)
|
| 18:55 | apurvanandan[m] | Bertl can you elaborate a little on third one
|
| 18:55 | aSobhy | sorry I didn't catch last one. what is meant by word ?
|
| 18:55 | aSobhy | code**
|
| 18:55 | Bertl | let's say you have mechanisms for 4:1 gearing
|
| 18:56 | Bertl | and you want to transfer data with 8 bits
|
| 18:56 | Bertl | the obvious way to transfer them is in two packets (code = identity)
|
| 18:56 | Bertl | s/packets/words/
|
| 18:57 | Bertl | let's say you want to improve on that by using a more advanced coding scheme
|
| 18:57 | Bertl | 8b10b is not an option here without gearwork to remap the bits
|
| 18:58 | Bertl | but you could use an 8b12b code instead
|
| 18:58 | Bertl | and transfer 3 words instead of 2
|
| 18:58 | apurvanandan[m] | Ahh,you mean to change encoding scheme
|
| 18:59 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 18:59 | se6astian | left the channel |
| 18:59 | se6astian|away | joined the channel |
| 19:00 | Bertl | if done properly, you can benefit from the longer codewords (better CRC, possibly ECC, lower frequencies, etc)
|
| 19:00 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 19:00 | se6astian | left the channel |
| 19:00 | RexOrCine|away | left the channel |
| 19:00 | Nira|away | left the channel |
| 19:00 | philippej | left the channel |
| 19:00 | BAndiT1983 | left the channel |
| 19:01 | apurvanandan[m] | ahh yes
|
| 19:01 | apurvanandan[m] | I have one more doubt, bit slip needs to be different for each lanes in the architecture shown right?
|
| 19:01 | se6astian|away | joined the channel |
| 19:01 | se6astian|away | changed nick to: se6astian
|
| 19:01 | BAndiT1983|away | joined the channel |
| 19:01 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
|
| 19:01 | philippej|away | joined the channel |
| 19:01 | Nira|away | joined the channel |
| 19:01 | RexOrCine|away | joined the channel |
| 19:01 | philippej|away | changed nick to: philippej
|
| 19:02 | aSobhy | but the 2 extra bits needs to be generating to make the work balanced also ?
|
| 19:02 | aSobhy | word**
|
| 19:02 | apurvanandan[m] | ie the ALIGNWD
|
| 19:02 | Bertl | DC balance is a nice feature, but not too relevant in your case as all the connections between FPGAs are DC coupled
|
| 19:03 | Bertl | so even if your code is way off regarding DC balance, it will work just fine
|
| 19:03 | Bertl | and yes, any word alignment needs to be done individually
|
| 19:04 | Bertl | but you can make some assumptions if you know the sender and the transmission line
|
| 19:04 | Bertl | i.e. if the sender is synchronous and the transmission line doesn't differ more than a bit is long, you can assume that you will get the data with at most 1 bit difference between the lanes
|
| 19:05 | Bertl | back to PRNG
|
| 19:06 | Bertl | for every LFSR of N bits, there is at least one 'optimal' polynomial which has 2^N-1 states till it loops
|
| 19:07 | Bertl | this also means that the generated bits, and that means _all_ of them, can be used for testing as they will go trough all possible values except for one
|
| 19:07 | apurvanandan[m] | If we aren't doing click recovery, connections are DC coupled , then why need 8b10b
|
| 19:07 | Bertl | depending on the LFSR type, this will be either 0 or 2^(N-1)
|
| 19:08 | Bertl | never said we need 8b10b, but you need some coding to verify what you are receiving
|
| 19:09 | Bertl | if you use 'identity' as coding, all values you get are 'valid' regardless of any synchronization or data corruption issues
|
| 19:10 | Bertl | (i.e. you will never know :)
|
| 19:11 | apurvanandan[m] | Oh, okay ie just for control codes
|
| 19:11 | Bertl | also encodings like TMDS (an 8b10b encoding) allow you to use the available bandwidth more efficient (i.e. transfer more data more reliably)
|
| 19:11 | Bertl | *efficiently
|
| 19:11 | Kjetil | use 7b11b ( ;P)
|
| 19:12 | apurvanandan[m] | XD
|
| 19:13 | Bertl | Kjetil: I'd prefer something with 13 or 17 bits :)
|
| 19:13 | apurvanandan[m] | Will again see less overhead encoding
|
| 19:14 | Kjetil | Bertl: 17b13b - Guaranteed 24% dataloss with every symbol
|
| 19:14 | Bertl | apurvanandan[m], aSobhy: so as this seems to be an issue here, let's focus on encodings, CRC and ECC for this week
|
| 19:15 | aSobhy | we should team again apurvanandan[m] :D
|
| 19:15 | Bertl | do that and please investigate the options, find suitable codings for our purpose within the hardware capabilities
|
| 19:15 | Bertl | make a list and document the pros and cons
|
| 19:16 | Bertl | also make a rough plan how to design the gearworks around them
|
| 19:16 | Bertl | let's try to have something till end of the week/week end
|
| 19:17 | apurvanandan[m] | Ok great
|
| 19:18 | aSobhy | OK
|
| 19:18 | aSobhy | I have one question
|
| 19:19 | Bertl | sure, go ahead
|
| 19:20 | aSobhy | for the clock recovery as I didn't test it yet I generated pll that has a reference clock I set it 100MHZ for now,
|
| 19:20 | aSobhy | and it has an input I set it to the income data (LVDS_in)
|
| 19:21 | aSobhy | and the output will be the recovered clock
|
| 19:21 | aSobhy | am I right or I should reference it with a clock from the MachXO2 ?
|
| 19:21 | Bertl | well, that is something you can do if you have a PLL suitable for clock recovery and the proper coding
|
| 19:22 | Bertl | I'm not aware that the MachXO2 PLL can do clock recovery, so most likely this will just result in a PLL which doesn't lock
|
| 19:25 | aSobhy | Ok, what can you advice me to do ?
|
| 19:25 | Bertl | personally I wouldn't spend much time on clock recovery with the MachXO2
|
| 19:26 | Bertl | you can have a smart logic which detects the inevitable drift caused by having different clocks
|
| 19:26 | Bertl | and compensates for it by dynamically adjusting the clock phase
|
| 19:27 | Bertl | or you can simply go for a common clock and derive your clocks from that (via PLL)
|
| 19:29 | aSobhy | OK I'll go with common clock
|
| 19:30 | apurvanandan[m] | Bertl: Please discuss about PRNG now
|
| 19:30 | Bertl | well, I kind of did already :)
|
| 19:31 | apurvanandan[m] | Ok ^^'
|
| 19:31 | Bertl | but to summarize: you need N bits of test data, get an LFSR with N bits size, find an 'optimal' polynomial and it will generate 2^N-1 values for you
|
| 19:31 | Bertl | you can use the 'degenerate' code (the 'forbidden state') for synchronization
|
| 19:31 | Bertl | as it won't be generated by the LFSR
|
| 19:32 | Bertl | you can simply XOR the output with a pattern you'd like to use for synchronization
|
| 19:32 | Bertl | note that 'xor-ing' the output is different from 'seeding' the LFSR
|
| 19:33 | Bertl | but both will result in a pseudo random sequence
|
| 19:36 | apurvanandan[m] | Ok great
|
| 19:40 | Bertl | good, then have fun with encodings :)
|
| 19:40 | apurvanandan[m] | Next week same time?
|
| 19:40 | aSobhy | are we done today !
|
| 19:40 | Bertl | and let me know if you encounter unexpected issues
|
| 19:41 | Bertl | yes, we are done for today, and yes, next week, same time, but let's try to get something done till end of week as mentioned before
|
| 19:41 | apurvanandan[m] | Definitely!
|
| 19:42 | aSobhy | sure :)
|
| 19:42 | apurvanandan[m] | Can we use oscilloscope for measuring fixed delays?
|
| 19:42 | apurvanandan[m] | In my current setup
|
| 19:43 | Bertl | if you pull that off for 1Gbit data rates, sure, why not :)
|
| 19:45 | apurvanandan[m] | Ok, one more thing the upper limit clock speed for DDR gearing is 378 Mhz in MachXO2
|
| 19:46 | apurvanandan[m] | We will definitely need more. But that is a later issue I guess
|
| 19:46 | aSobhy | but that mean 378*2
|
| 19:47 | apurvanandan[m] | I need atleast 800 if I used 8b/10b
|
| 19:48 | apurvanandan[m] | Lets search for other encoding scheme for DC coupled systems
|
| 19:48 | Bertl | that's why you want to sample with two phase related clocks
|
| 19:48 | Bertl | (as done in the x4 and 7:1 examples)
|
| 19:50 | apurvanandan[m] | You mean two clock lanes?
|
| 19:50 | Bertl | no, you generate two clocks (with the PLL) with a fixed clock relation of 90deg
|
| 19:51 | Bertl | then you can sample at 4 times the clock rate
|
| 19:52 | Bertl | once again, check the Lattice high speed interfaces with MachXO2 for details (linked on the task description)
|
| 19:52 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
|
| 19:52 | apurvanandan[m] | Actually I have read that completely
|
| 19:52 | Bertl | you can also achieve a similar effect with an delay element
|
| 19:53 | apurvanandan[m] | My doubt is at the end the ddr primitive needs to be clocked at 400 MHz edge clock right?
|
| 19:54 | Bertl | why?
|
| 19:54 | Bertl | what bandwidth do you plan to run?
|
| 19:55 | apurvanandan[m] | Each lanes at 400 MHz DDR
|
| 19:55 | Bertl | so 800Mbit, yes?
|
| 19:56 | apurvanandan[m] | =800 Mbps
|
| 19:56 | apurvanandan[m] | Yes
|
| 19:56 | Bertl | with x4, this means 200MHz clock
|
| 19:56 | apurvanandan[m] | Ok I think I missed something.
|
| 19:57 | apurvanandan[m] | The clock is edge aligned with each bit from OSERDES right?
|
| 19:58 | Bertl | that really depends on how you generate it
|
| 19:58 | Bertl | for example, if you have a 1:10 serializer
|
| 19:59 | Bertl | then it is good practice to generate the clock from a pattern like 0000011111
|
| 19:59 | Bertl | (via the same serializer setup you use for data)
|
| 19:59 | apurvanandan[m] | Ohh, I used 1010101010 actually
|
| 19:59 | Bertl | well, that's unnecessarily high
|
| 20:00 | apurvanandan[m] | It is clear now Thanks :)
|
| 20:00 | Bertl | i.e. it will create a high frequency clock which has all the problems you don't need
|
| 20:01 | Bertl | you typically transfer the clock at moderate frequency and use the PLL to regenerate the high speed clocks
|
| 20:01 | apurvanandan[m] | Ok I got it
|
| 20:13 | Spirit532 | left the channel |
| 20:14 | Spirit532 | joined the channel |
| 20:55 | BAndiT1983|away | changed nick to: BAndiT1983
|
| 21:49 | BAndiT1983 | changed nick to: BAndiT1983|away
|
| 22:59 | Y_G | joined the channel |
| 23:04 | se6astian | off to bed
|
| 23:04 | se6astian | good night
|
| 23:04 | se6astian | changed nick to: se6astian|away
|