15:23 | aombk | left the channel | |
15:23 | aombk | joined the channel | |
16:20 | polyrhythm | anuejn: this weekend I set aside some time and did what you suggested, first trying to use my base DCP file (and giving up after just weird errors) and then using the included one
| |
16:21 | polyrhythm | the result is that the images are still garbled crap
| |
16:21 | polyrhythm | i made a pull request on gpu_node_refactor so you can see
| |
16:21 | polyrhythm | if you try to uncomment the line on my config, you'll see the bizarre error i get on my very straightofrward dng dcp file
| |
16:21 | polyrhythm | if you try to use it as-is, you should generate "correct" but garbled DNGs
| |
16:22 | polyrhythm | since it's painful to go back and forth on this, I would consider this "good to go" for me once you can confirm to generate a working, clean DNG from a pass-through DCP config such as the one I commented out
| |
16:22 | polyrhythm | then I can start my stuff
| |
16:23 | polyrhythm | you can confirm if the DNG works by opening it in a few different applications and seeing how it looks:
| |
16:23 | polyrhythm | - adobe dng converter
| |
16:23 | polyrhythm | - photoshop
| |
16:23 | polyrhythm | - darktable (in the darkroom editor, not the file browser)
| |
16:23 | se6astian | thanks for the update polyrhythm!
| |
16:24 | polyrhythm | no problemo
|